Aeternos Astramora Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 that's one hell of a bandwagon there Bandwagon? Um, what sort of definition of "bandwagon" are you using? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homeboy Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Bandwagon? Um, what sort of definition of "bandwagon" are you using? how various people keep saying the same thing, all not members of the NSO alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baden-Württemberg Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 how various people keep saying the same thing, all not members of the NSO alliance. We keep saying the same thing because we have the same opinion. Now, I don't want to look like I am telling NSO what to do, but they were the ones announcing their huge Doctrine, and now it is more than normal that people want to see whether it is used or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 how various people keep saying the same thing, all not members of the NSO alliance. Ahhhhh... I thought you were saying NSO would bandwagon by attacking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 We keep saying the same thing because we have the same opinion. Now, I don't want to look like I am telling NSO what to do, but they were the ones announcing their huge Doctrine, and now it is more than normal that people want to see whether it is used or not. Does this mean we have to be mentioned in every single thread about a war? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 We keep saying the same thing because we have the same opinion. Now, I don't want to look like I am telling NSO what to do, but they were the ones announcing their huge Doctrine, and now it is more than normal that people want to see whether it is used or not. This isn't about us, though, and it's in the best interests of CG for it to remain that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homeboy Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Does this mean we have to be mentioned in every single thread about a war? It seems to me like it. It's like a fashion and NSO is in style this week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 It seems to me like it. It's like a fashion and NSO is in style this week. Sounds good to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Sounds good to me So, if your in fashion, does that mean I can wear you as a hat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Does this mean we have to be mentioned in every single thread about a war? Well, as you've said you reserve the right to enter any war you choose, then the possibility of you entering a war is on the table whenever a war occurs. Naturally, people may mention it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydro Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) We keep saying the same thing because we have the same opinion. Now, I don't want to look like I am telling NSO what to do, but they were the ones announcing their huge Doctrine, and now it is more than normal that people want to see whether it is used or not. The mechanisms by which our alliance are run are used at our discretion and ours alone. I see no advantage accrued to NSO or reason in jumping into a situation that doesn't involve us and, quite frankly, isn't our business. edit spelling Edited August 21, 2009 by Hydro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydro Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Well, as you've said you reserve the right to enter any war you choose, then the possibility of you entering a war is on the table whenever a war occurs. Naturally, people may mention it. If you read the Doctrine in its entirety, you'll also note that we are under no obligation to declare ourself for either side. Nice try though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeinousOne Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Well, as you've said you reserve the right to enter any war you choose, then the possibility of you entering a war is on the table whenever a war occurs. Naturally, people may mention it. Yes, well after the Popcorn War it seems people wont have just the NSO to point to in this regard now will they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) If you read the Doctrine in its entirety, you'll also note that we are under no obligation to declare ourself for either side. Nice try though. I'm not trying anything. If you read my post in its entirety without, say, looking to skew it in such a way as to give you something stupid to say about it, you may notice I never said you were obligated, and I specifically qualified my words to make it obvious that I wasn't saying that, and in fact saying the opposite. Let's go back to the post, shall we? "Well, as you've said you reserve the right to enter any war you choose, then the possibility of you entering a war is on the table whenever a war occurs. Naturally, people may mention it." Yes, well after the Popcorn War it seems people wont have just the NSO to point to in this regard now will they? No they won't. In fact, the more common it becomes the less likely people are going to think of the NSO specifically in these cases. Edited August 21, 2009 by Sal Paradise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeinousOne Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 No they won't. In fact, the more common it becomes the less likely people are going to think of the NSO specifically in these cases. Funny how it works that way isn't it? Popcorn War indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Blair Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Yeah there's no way I'm reading the entire thread. I'd just like to say that I hope I get to nuke the internet superheroes, and I hope all the allies they have who promised to defend them will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Goby Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Yeah there's no way I'm reading the entire thread.I'd just like to say that I hope I get to nuke the internet superheroes, and I hope all the allies they have who promised to defend them will. Aren't you just a doll? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 So, if your in fashion, does that mean I can wear you as a hat? My question was not answered Griff! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Well, as you've said you reserve the right to enter any war you choose, then the possibility of you entering a war is on the table whenever a war occurs. Naturally, people may mention it. Invicta agreed with the Moldavi Doctrine. Should we get brought up in every single war thread then too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King DrunkWino Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Invicta agreed with the Moldavi Doctrine. Should we get brought up in every single war thread then too? Would you like to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Would you like to? Go ahead, we could use a little attention whoring now and then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Go ahead, we could use a little attention whoring now and then. Now, now...lets not stoop to pinks level . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom Zak Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 wow, thats crap! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timeline Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I can understand IS attacking CG with out a valid CB or with no CB at all, dam we have had that in CN for as long as I can remember, one thing I have never got, more then likely never will, IF you are mad at what someone has done then take action. Friends over Infra comes to mind right now. I am not saying CG or IS is right, I am just saying if your unhappy do something about it, dont spam up the owf with nothing more then a LOOK AT ME TOPIC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Actually, I think anyone would take flak for raiding a recognized alliance with CMs and bombers. Granted, a lot of people (myself not the least among them) would get a lot of laughs out of IS being rolled, but that doesn't change the situation.-Bama It doesn't. There's nothing to this, really. CG has no treaties and they're paying the price for it. I hope they learn from this. -Marx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.