Hell Scream Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Hahaha. Very dis-honorable MHA. You should try upholding treaties next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George von Hamburg Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 The movement to destroy the PO has reached a level where this is not needed and will go in vain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaannndddyyy Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Have fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raider Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 )): Bandwagoners )): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceptyr Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Very fair. Good luck! o/ MHA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B Tard Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 tis fair, well played MHA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azrael Alexander Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Hahaha. Very dis-honorable MHA. You should try upholding treaties next time. we are for the 100th time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorum Posted April 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Hahaha. Very dis-honorable MHA. You should try upholding treaties next time. Do explain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boscher Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 what is this, a new kind of treaty? MDOAP light? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azrael Alexander Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 what is this, a new kind of treaty? MDOAP light? And MDoAP with an alliance that has conflicting treaties maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra25900 Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) Thanks for the clarification. Honorable but confused at the same time Edited April 22, 2009 by Supra25900 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorum Posted April 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 what is this, a new kind of treaty? MDOAP light? Any attacks resulting from NPO's DoW on Ordo Verde constitutes an aggressive war on the NPO's part. Anyone bandwagoning puts NPO in a defensive war, where we are obligated to defend them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 excellent decision. this wasn't supposed to be a bandwagon anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prometheius Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 This was needed because some alliances that aren't tied to OV through a treaty will DoW on NPO for past grievances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caustic Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 This was needed because some alliances that aren't tied to OV through a treaty will DoW on NPO for past grievances. which, one could argue, is well within their right to correct years of wrongs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WingEater Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 which, one could argue, is well within their right to correct years of wrongs Maybe in their rights, but MHA has a MDoAP and must defend NPO against an agressive attack...so.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 which, one could argue, is well within their right to correct years of wrongs but that isn't a CB... they lost the war. they should simply accept it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caustic Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 well lets hope it doesn't come to that... I'd hate to see MHA get rolled alongside them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xiphosis Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Expected nothing less. Good on you, MHA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) <snip>I'd tighten down that definition. I'd back off, if I were you. well lets hope it doesn't come to that... I'd hate to see MHA get rolled alongside them No one will be rolling our allies in the MHA. Period. Edited April 22, 2009 by Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sceptor o Sordidness Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 You are MHAwesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azrael Alexander Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 well lets hope it doesn't come to that... I'd hate to see MHA get rolled alongside them You gotta do what you gotta do unfortunatly. This war was hideously uneeded, but if it comes to that then we still have our MDoAP's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Taco Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 I'd back off, if I were you.No one will be rolling our allies in the MHA. Period. I appreciate the sentiment! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azrael Alexander Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) No one will be rolling our allies in the MHA. Period. The great irony would be if we are drawn in and you guys help us help us, help out NPO after all the "ZOMG gre are gonna kill pacifica" romours Edited April 22, 2009 by Shamshir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coursca Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Good policy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts