Doc Taco Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Well we knew it was coming and we tried to keep the peace as long as we could. I think that and not allowing ourselves enough time to disentangle ourselves... You mean 1 year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shurukian Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I dislike bandwagoners. Even though you're not fighting, good show MHA. At least you offered something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azrael Alexander Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 You mean 1 year? eh huh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syzygy Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 if both sides agree the pact can be amended any time. the 1-year-clause is for unilateral cancellation, not for mutual agreement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWConner Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Earlier, the MHA announced that we would not be fighting alongside the New Pacific Order. I would like to amend this announcement slightly to point our that the treaty is still active, and we will defend the NPO against anyone who seeks to bandwagon. At the request of Karma, those who are bandwagoning will be given one chance to back down. Those who fail to do so will find themselves in a state of war with the MHA. Thank you for your time, The MHA. EDIT for clarification: [17:41] <Count_Rupert[MHA]> Anyone attacking without treaty ties to the conflict. So does this mean that MHA will be asking DT to backdown from SSSW18? Oh, and HAI RUPERT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 So does this mean that MHA will be asking DT to backdown from SSSW18? The MHA isn't allied to SSW18, as far as I can tell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mathews Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) So does this mean that MHA will be asking DT to backdown from SSSW18? Oh, and HAI RUPERT! The MHA will only be Investigating those alliances that Bandwagon against the NPO, The MHA isn't allied to SSW18, as far as I can tell This is true Edited April 23, 2009 by John Mathews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcgrath Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 and who decides whos bandwagoning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mathews Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 The MHA triumvirate, (WCR, Sorum and Crushtania) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Brutus Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Honorable guys... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxghx0xstxx Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 I hope I don't get warned for saying this because I'm being very serious and not trying to get anyone's goat, either. Band wagon? It looks like NPO is going to be erased by this onslaught. Anyone trying to aid this endeavor should be encouraged, in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iamrecognized Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 (edited) We are not going to encourage people to attack our treaty partner with no justification. In case you don't know, we are still honoring this announcement and have stopped several attacks. Edit: Sorry, didn't notice it was a gravedig. Edited May 10, 2009 by Iamrecognized Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxghx0xstxx Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 Whoops, I forgot too. Either way. Also, fantastic that you're honoring the treaty, I guess. I hope that wasn't a sidelong threat or something because, as you may recall ( http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=54866 ) MOON was one of the first to declare. No band wagoners in our alliance, thank you very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iamrecognized Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 Not a threat at all, just a reminder to anyone who may think that they can jump in right now. Not directed at you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azrael Alexander Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 I hope I don't get warned for saying this because I'm being very serious and not trying to get anyone's goat, either. Band wagon? It looks like NPO is going to be erased by this onslaught.Anyone trying to aid this endeavor should be encouraged, in my opinion. Who are you to decide whether or not an alliance is allowed to exist? One thing you can be sure of is as long as we have the treaty we will make sure that does not happen. Also we have stopped a couple of people so if you wish to encourage people to test us please do. And they like IRON will understand why were only mostly harmless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanfed Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 have the rules for gravedig already been changed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Eye Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 I hope I don't get warned for saying this because I'm being very serious and not trying to get anyone's goat, either. Band wagon? It looks like NPO is going to be erased by this onslaught.Anyone trying to aid this endeavor should be encouraged, in my opinion. I'm afraid that gravedigs are still against the rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts