Chancellor Bismarck Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 In light of the recent attempt for a nuclear free world, I call this conference together in Confucius to ascertain a reasonable agreement for the non-proliferation and disarmament of nuclear weapons. The main agenda of this conference is to: -Ascertain a timeline for the disarmament of nuclear weapons; -Ascertain minimum defense requirements for the defense against nuclear weapons; -Ascertain different methods of strategic weapons instead of nuclear arsenals; -Ascertain a "No First Strike" agreement while nuclear weapons are being disarmed, and the feasability of such; -Determine the benefits of a nuclear free world against a nuclear world; -Other things that can be brought up by delegates at the Conference. I invite every nation in the world to this conference, and encourage all to participate. It is to be held in "Confucius' Peace". The Confuciust Armed Forces shall provide all necessary security arrangements, however, if you wish to have bodyguards, you may bring up to five. If you request a fighter escort into Confucianism, contact our Foreign Office. Delegation sizes are limited to ten, and you may bring your own methods of secure communication. Sincerely, President Pacifism, Confucianism OOC: You can RP your request to come, your landing, and your arrival at "Confucius' Peace", our foreign building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Promised Land will consider sending a representative. First we have to find someone who isn;t worn out from the rapid pace of the re-building effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chancellor Bismarck Posted February 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Promised Land will consider sending a representative. First we have to find someone who isn;t worn out from the rapid pace of the re-building effort. Confucianism understands, and hopes that you can find someone to attend the Conference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mergerberger II Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 There are more pressing matters right now, like full-scale nuclear warfare in Europe. We can't attend this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Rebel Virginia refuses to sign any such agreement. We shall protest this conference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chancellor Bismarck Posted February 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 There are more pressing matters right now, like full-scale nuclear warfare in Europe. We can't attend this. Confucianism understands, and wishes you the best in a swift resolution to nuclear war. Confucianism recognises the protest of Rebel Virginia, and respects your decision to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Saboria will send a representative, though we can at the moment not guarantee that we will sign a document. Currently, the world is too unstable, and too many idiots are lobbing nukes around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiserMelech Mikhail Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 We have already signed our own anti-nuclear weaponry document, but there is no harm in signing this one too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Rebel Virginia refuses to sign any such agreement. We shall protest this conference. We doubt you would be able to to do anything else when under overwhelming attack... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 We doubt you would be able to to do anything else when under overwhelming attack... We are not surprised to see Promised Land celebrating the misfortune of our citizens. Even after coming to your aid during your time of need, you still spit on us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 We are not surprised to see Promised Land celebrating the misfortune of our citizens. Even after coming to your aid during your time of need, you still spit on us. You assume to much. We weremerely commenting on your plight. We would offer aid, but we somehow doubt you would accept it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 (edited) While the Imperium recognizes the noble cause this represents, as well as the ideal model of humanity it exemplifies; we cannot honestly sign such a document and remain true to our own philosophical understandings. The world is a cruel and unjust place where the only real source of truth is the ability of one to impose their view upon another. Thus in order to shield ourselves, protect our allies, and prevent the exploitation of the inherent disadvantage this would place upon us, we must adhere to strict realism, and acknowledge the need for our own nuclear weapons by rejecting the premise this conference functions upon. However, we do wish you luck in your mission. Edited February 20, 2009 by iamthey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 The Queen in exile will attend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeSchaine Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Taeunas already refuses to build such weapons (because we refuse to be world ending lunatics like a few of the rest of you that shall remain nameless) but will send a represenative to offer any insight we can. We are also not surprised to see that Rebel Virginia is protesting this. We think that if someone was standing on a corner handing out free doses of common sense, they would protest that as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Saboria will send a representative, though we can at the moment not guarantee that we will sign a document. Currently, the world is too unstable, and too many idiots are lobbing nukes around. We shall echo Saboria's actions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 The representative from Promised Land, the massive black man known as Theodore Jameson, would be arriving by helicopter at the designated coordinates. As he stepped out of the craft, he looked around to see if there was anyone to greet him... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 You assume to much. We weremerely commenting on your plight. We would offer aid, but we somehow doubt you would accept it... Well then, you assume too much. Would you still offer us aid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Well then, you assume too much. Would you still offer us aid? ***Classified*** Of course, we will not interfere publicly, but we can officially send a ship as part of a "humanitarian effort." On it will be weapons and supplies for your military. It should be there within two days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vasili Markov Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Neo Olympia issues the following statement to the conference. -Ascertain a timeline for the disarmament of nuclear weapons;Disarmament is not a realistic option since many nuclear nations will not give up their arsenals, so moderation of their offensive use is the only realistic option. -Ascertain minimum defence requirements for the defence against nuclear weapons; A treaty with a joint agreement to declare war on the first person who uses a nuclear first strike. The sharing of the coverage area of SDI by all treaty members so that all nuclear weapons will be destroyed in the launch phase and eliminate the threat that they pose to neutral nations in any future conflict. -Ascertain different methods of strategic weapons instead of nuclear arsenals; The following methods while extremely destructive do not have the long term global consequences of nuclear weapons. 1 Fuel-Air explosives, These cause massive explosions that cause strategic level damage to cities. And most importantly these weapons have a contained area of effect and do not effect areas beyond the target as severely as a nuclear blast. 2 Exo Atmospheric Nuclear Blasts for EMP pulse effects, This will eliminate the fallout problem that the entire world suffers every time someone uses a nuke. 3 Use of coalitions of conventional forces to outnumber the rival, If you wish to invade someone it is a well known doctrine to have overwhelming forces overwhelm your rivals, This has several advantages over the use of nuclear weapons the greatest of which is that the invader gets land that is not poisoned and useless. I am sure that even the representative from Rebel Virginia will recognise that having more land and resources after a war is better than having less, and nuclear weapons destroy resources that could be put to use and render land uninhabitable. -Ascertain a "No First Strike" agreement while nuclear weapons are being disarmed, and the feasibility of such; Disarmament is not a realistic option since many nuclear nations will not give up their arsenals, But if several nations agree to jointly declare on anyone using a nuclear first strike then that will make the use of a first strike an act of suicide. -Determine the benefits of a nuclear free world against a nuclear world; Continued survival of the human race. A clean environment, This has benefits that are too numerous to mention. More usable living areas, nuclear glass deserts are not very usable for any nation. -Other things that can be brought up by delegates at the Conference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiserMelech Mikhail Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 (edited) The Marscurian delegate stands up, I wish to add a non-spread clause, so that no new nations shall gain nuclear weapons, whether they are for a deterent or actual use. We should also address nuclear power for peaceful electricity and transportation (subs, aircraft carriers) purposes. Edited February 21, 2009 by KaiserMelech Mikhail I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 "The statement from Neo Olympia has merit. What say you all to their remarks?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vasili Markov Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 The Marscurian delegate stands up,I wish to add a non-spread clause, so that no new nations shall gain nuclear weapons, whether they are for a deterent or actual use. We should also address nuclear power for peaceful electricity and transportation (subs, aircraft carriers) purposes. In the fullness of time we will obtain nuclear weapons for use as a deterrent, But I pledge on my oath to never to be the first to use these weapons in any war we might ever be involved in, any time in the future. We will only ever use them as a deterrent as per our previous proposal and we will not use them as an offensive weapon ever. And stopping new nations from obtaining them will make them easy targets for those nations that already have them. So I wish to propose a "no first strike" clause instead of a non-spread clause. Nuclear weapons damage everyone, not just their targets. So when one is used the person who uses them hurts not just their enemies, but their allies, neutral nations and most importantly themselves. So their use should be closely regulated by everyone since their use effects everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carter Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 The Republic of California looks forward to attending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chancellor Bismarck Posted February 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 The Confucianist Delegation looks on Neo Olympia's proposal with favor. We agree that, while it may not be feasible to disarm all nuclear weapons, we can moderate their use. A "No First Strike" policy is a good step forward, guaranteeing that nuclear weapons are used only for deterrence and defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imperator Azenquor Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Vaule will be sending a representative from the Diplomatic Corps to attend this conference. Mr. D. E. Plohmat will arrive shortly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.