Jump to content

NPO Maestro’s First Sing-Along Embargo Report


Sir Paul

Recommended Posts

Farrin sent a clear message by canceling NPOs treaty with IRON. Any foederati ally that refused to conform would be isolated and humiliated. Obviously NPO couldnt force anyone to stay, but they could apply political pressure (up until they couldn't anymore).

Im ready to move on and embrace Pacifica as part of the international community, but post war propaganda like this "embargo report" doesnt help.


That might all be true if indeed NPO cancelled on IRON.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farrin sent a clear message by canceling NPOs treaty with IRON. Any foederati ally that refused to conform would be isolated and humiliated. Obviously NPO couldnt force anyone to stay, but they could apply political pressure (up until they couldn't anymore).

Im ready to move on and embrace Pacifica as part of the international community, but post war propaganda like this "embargo report" doesnt help.

You're right, that treaty was canceled because IRON was fighting on their side but left the war because peace talks were taking too long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farrin sent a clear message by canceling NPOs treaty with IRON. Any foederati ally that refused to conform would be isolated and humiliated. Obviously NPO couldnt force anyone to stay, but they could apply political pressure (up until they couldn't anymore).

Im ready to move on and embrace Pacifica as part of the international community, but post war propaganda like this "embargo report" doesnt help.


You do realize that it was IRON who cancelled our alliance treaty, right?

What NPO cancelled was a NAP, at a point when IRON had just attacked our ally. Now, if you want to spin us acting in support of our allies as us "intimidating" them.... Edited by Letum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

My material is consistent. Pacifica is in a confused and reactionary state, and in desperate need of reform. I talked to Cortath a while back but I don't blame him for not wanting to fix Pacifica's mess twice.

I'm unclear what precisely you are attributing to me, but let me state for the record that I don't believe Pacifica has anything like the problems that I faced at my appointment as the Fourth Emperor of the New Pacific Order. I don't know what you're attributing to me, or why, or what conversation this was you mean to be referencing, but the substance is not that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...