Jump to content

The GM's Court


Centurius

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

From what I understand though, Centurius directly quoted her post in another thread.

 

This would make a red notification icon pop up in the 'Notifications' subfolder at the top of your forum interface. So there was an attempt to make contact.

 

In that same post he quoted her, he provided a direct link to his thread that he attacked her in.

Edited by TheShammySocialist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I understand though, Centurius directly quoted her post in another thread.

 

This would make a red notification icon pop up in the 'Notifications' subfolder at the top of your forum interface. So there was an attempt to make contact.

 

In that same post he quoted her, he provided a direct link to his thread that he attacked her in.

Only if such is enabled. I for my part don't get any notification at all if I get quoted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The destruction of all four bridges on the Faroe Islands were immediate and with the loss of life of only two civilians. With radar jammed, the Airborne divisions, which had paratrooped onto the islands, found little to not resistance among the sparsely settled rocky shores and even some excitement among local residents as the sun rose to see a new day and a new country raising its flag over the islands. The first objective of the Airborne troopers was to secure any and all military instillations which had not been destroyed in the initial missile strike. This mostly consisted of radar/early warning stations and a few small naval facilities which most likely housed some sort of coast guard.

I call this blatant RPing of Kankou's citizens and would like to request the GMs to clarify whether such actions are possible with a autoadvance even. As far as I know, an autoadvance allows for one side to advance their military forces and to partially RP enemy forces under the assumption that these behave in a manner of no initiative taken and more or less in self-defense. Reasonable casualties are to be RPed. In no instance however, I ever got the impression an autoadvance allowed a person to assume control of the other side's civilian population that was not directly partaking in the combat action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I concur with Mogar in this aspect.

 

The autoadvance was granted with the expressed interest of moving the roleplay along. This does not give wholesale nor blanket coverage to roleplaying Kankou's citizens at this point in the roleplay, we're still at a stage where she can respond. Whether this happens or not, does not matter in terms of this objection. Such claims of loyalty or roleplaying of citizens cannot be assumed until we've established her as officially inactive, or at a critical juncture, where Noord-Uniestaat has essentially been completely invested by invading forces. And even then, we still have a period of time in which a dispute can be accorded, until she is formally inactive.

 

As such, the objection stands, and I suggest editing the highlighted parts provided by Evangeline, out of the in-question roleplay.

Edited by TheShammySocialist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I call this blatant RPing of Kankou's citizens and would like to request the GMs to clarify whether such actions are possible with a autoadvance even. As far as I know, an autoadvance allows for one side to advance their military forces and to partially RP enemy forces under the assumption that these behave in a manner of no initiative taken and more or less in self-defense. Reasonable casualties are to be RPed. In no instance however, I ever got the impression an autoadvance allowed a person to assume control of the other side's civilian population that was not directly partaking in the combat action.

 

The wording with my statement is perfectly fine. I was not declaring they were happy of my presence, but merely excited (I think it is safe to assume they noticed they tens of thousands of soldiers landing in their back yards). Here is a link to the definition of "Excitement" from Oxford Dictionary: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/excitement

 

Here are two examples of how "excitement" can be used in a sentence referring to the link I provided above:

 

"Her cheeks were flushed with excitement." This does not definitely mean positive excitement, but it is a close enough example.

"The excitement of seeing a live leopard." This is neutral or even fearful excitement.

Conclusion: Excitement can be positive, negative, or more of a physical reaction.

 

 

I was implying neutral excitement. It's not up to me to decide if they are happy or angry - yet. That's up to Kankou. But it's virtually impossible for the civilians not to notice I am there and I assume they have the intelligence acknowledge that Icelandic troops are out of the ordinary. 

 

Also... The court or the plaintiffs used to contact individuals who were accused of doing wrong; is that service eating up too much of the budget? 

Edited by PresidentDavid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...