Epiphanus

Burn 'em down Umbrella.

I guess Polar thinks this will save them allies? Maybe it will work. I'll be disappointed in CnG if it does, however. :\

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. I wanted to do this

Good luck to our allies in Argent, good luck to the friends in RIA too. I'm sure you guys will keep this classy.

Never liked NATO anyway, hope they burn for a while.

[quote name='ilselu1' date='05 February 2010 - 09:23 AM' timestamp='1265383407' post='2161505'] Bork Bork. Borkdy Borkdy Bork. [/quote] English only plox. This is a bit sad.

Any new users is a good thing. But, they probably won't do well from an NS standpoint, starting at zero... but they could, you never know.

Down with Texas. (Sorry admin) Also, Boomer Sooner.

I'm not saying these terms are harsh, but making everyone give up 50 tech, and decom improvements is a bit... meh. I'd prefer white peace but you guys are in charge.

TOP ended up fighting STA anyway... I bet you guys wish it had been a couple months ago, now.

Well wish you would have chosen someone other than valhalla to attack o/ Valhalla DT (still love you though) >_> Secret treaties.

[quote name='AlmightyGrub' date='02 February 2010 - 11:52 PM' timestamp='1265176334' post='2155492'] Ah, tick tock time? Welcome the fun, why should you miss out [/quote] See you out there big guy <3

Congrats Longbowe!

This was kronos' idea from that last blue ball escapade.... Sad to say we didn't get to use it But props to you for following all treaties.

Thanks admin, glad to know it's all safe and snug.

It does feel like some sort of noob boards.. . I can't stand to look at it.

I doubt they put much behind the optional aggression clauses in those treaties. Seeing as MK is allied to polar.

You still have to take into account the choice of the attack. If this were MK, or TOP, or GOD rather than \m/, the situation would have had a much different outcome. NpO chose to exercise it's course of action because they had a firm grasp on the situation and the repercussions to Polaris as an alliance, and the nations of polaris. If they also would have attacked PC, then the can that contains the worms would have been opened for this to move beyond their control. Thus why they are choosing to force PC to attack them and be the "aggressors" when in fact they are still the aggressors regardless of who attacks first. Might makes right.

His actions are. I guess he thought MK more likely to "do something about it" back.

But CNARF WAS about stopping tech raiders.

Members of RoK might be asking themselves the same question...

I feel like I should just throw this back at you with, no u. You disputing the fact of the connection is laughable.

Indeed, I wonder how many people know that NpO was nearly at this point a few months ago with Athens and FoB. They followed through this time because they hope they can keep it to them beating down \m/ and PC. Hopefully they will be disappointed.

The analysis is fine, as is the analogy. One group attacks tech raiders, another group attacks tech raiders. Analogy simplified.

Heh, if that's how you want to connect it, then what you say is true. I was connecting their actions to another set of actions. Thank you for in a way proving my point.