Jump to content

TBRaiders

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    926

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by TBRaiders

  1. TBRaiders
    The only rogues I see are the nations declaring wars on established alliances, such as DBDC and MQ, without a DoW. You and others can call them rogues, but we disagree and additional discourse will not change our stance on that position. We can agree to disagree, but we will choose to do so with more than words alone.
  2. TBRaiders
    It hurts my belly to read your posts. That can't be normal.
  3. TBRaiders
    Hurling threats since 2013.
  4. TBRaiders
    Hime, good post but a couple things: 1) Currently on the DBDC AA five of the top ten nations are from MK. To suggest our top MQ nations would have folded without inflicting serious damage is inaccurate. 2) We expected resistance and some opportunistic sniping from the sidelines. Whether we got more or less would be debatable depending on who you asked. For me, it was about what I expected. For others, much less. Rooman, you are delusional. I would say more, but I don't think we are living in the same reality so it doesn't matter.
  5. TBRaiders
    Rooman, you were a 311K NS nation at the beginning of this, somewhere ranked in the top 15 of all nations. if you are going to continue to cry about being "down-declared" (this isn't TE man, nobody cares) at least quit posting about beating on nations you "down'declared" on who were 100K NS below you. MK forum is open for anyone to join now that the alliance has disbanded. All CN related posts have been archived and are available for viewing. You can see the discussion, the vote, the targets...and if that thread isn't available yet I am sure we can get someone to make it available. Two to three weeks was the plan. Whether you choose to believe it or not, doesn't change the fact it is the truth. There are some nations who just don't care anymore and will continue to reside on the MQ AA and hit whoever they want until they are destroyed or deleted.
  6. TBRaiders
    I forgot about Pedro 1 and II, but I haven't forgotten the good times I had in GPA when I first came to this world. MQ doesn't have any formal leaders but you can consider me an official source and can query me on IRC if you have any questions. Is that how you interpreted my post? TDO and GOP alone have taken almost 3.5 million NS damage while MQ never hit 3 million total NS and I posted where 2.1 million of it went to two different AA's. Regardless, the bigger point was there was never a serious threat that a handful of nations were going to wipe neutrality from this planet. I am not going to belabor that point again. Soft neutrality doesn't excuse owf ignorance, ie IC posting, role-playing, rhetoric. I was inclined to reach out to Theo and see if he wanted to talk about us ending hostilities which I am assuming would give you guys an out, but if you want to continue this a bit longer to crush this "jihad" for good. we are okay with it. Also, as an FYI: 1) 163K NS doesn't equal 200K NS. 2) War details damage isn't always the same as accurate NS damage. When you don't lose defensive GA while winning your offensive GA it offsets that nuke damage nicely. I'm not saying you haven't caused great damage with those nukes, especially in those initial wars, but your personal damage taken to damage dealt ratio will not be in your favor when this does end.
  7. TBRaiders
    MQ was a planned two week thing from the start by a group of members; a last "whatever" for the active guys to fight together one more time before the majority of nations remaining on that AA delete or find new homes. None of the members who even put it together are still on the AA. About 500K of that lost MQ NS has applied to TOP and 1.3 million of that NS has found itself on the DBDC AA. Looking over the nations remaining on MQ I see maybe a couple more that might not delete. There was no real war vs neutrality planned and GOP, while doing an honorable thing defending a perceived threat, was never in any danger of being attacked by this temporary grouping. Regardless, I appreciate the extra wars and have enjoyed my chats with the two active guys I am fighting from your AA. Quality guys.
  8. TBRaiders
    I'm not sure if you are poking fun at yourself or somehow serious, because this is exactly what you did. If I really cared, I could go to my old computer and dig up the screen shots of your PM's where you apologized to me for your poor performance and saying you'd do better the next round when you could down declare down on new targets. You know oya and me were doing equal damage and you were not our only war, but you can pretend otherwise for your audience of idiots. You and I both know what really happened and neither of us needs to recheck that scoreboard.
  9. TBRaiders
    You resorted to name calling and talking about e-peen. I lose and you win. Give yourself a pat on the back, o mighty owf champion.
  10. TBRaiders
    The difference is those guys who do turtle don't come on here talking tough. It is a valid tactic depending on your enemy and current situation and I don't have a problem with people doing it but don't go around talking crap. Also, I just like to remind chairmanhal that he started turtling 4 days into a global war. 4 days...
  11. TBRaiders
    Funny, but don't rewrite history. You had 7K more infra than me when I declared and you were a below average fighter. I just fought 3 nations with 8K, 10K, and 13k more infra than me and two of them had more tech. You run your mouth a lot and most of it sounds like a lot of crying to me.
  12. TBRaiders
    Who is supposed to be impressed by that. Certainly not anyone who has fought you before and had to watch you launch CMs from the turtle position.
  13. TBRaiders
    You'd be surprised then...
  14. TBRaiders
    I wonder how long before people try to bait them into making another stupid decision.
  15. TBRaiders
    DBDC is also composed of MQ (ex-MK) members. One AA is as good as another when you are fighting the same war. ...and we all know it is nothing more than role-playing/rhetoric.
  16. TBRaiders
    lol to those who think upper tier MK nations are the ones leaving. Plenty of people in MK are departing this world but the majority of our upper tier guys still enjoy collecting casualties and will find a new home.
  17. TBRaiders
    It is quite the opposite of neutral. Where were all these drum beaters when GPA was getting attacked so long ago? That's right, they were attacked by such an overwhelming force people buried their heads in the sand. Best of luck GOP. I am very fond of our protectorate MQ so I imagine we will get to know each other better over the next couple months.
  18. TBRaiders
    Always a pleasure fighting two of the more active and skilled alliances in the game. Einer, you are a top-notch opponent, I want to say best of luck the rest of the round but you don't need any luck. Congrats on the casualty trophy. It is yours to win.
  19. TBRaiders
    Death to Citadel o/ NAO
  20. TBRaiders
    First time I've read this thread. Great DoW. #occupythesun I was in a small AA last round (Hades) that was raided a couple times by SUN. Was given the run around by leadership when I asked nicely if they could stop raiding us. We had 10 members and they "changed" their policy to 11. Not the first round trying to be in a micro and being raided by SUN. Good show SO.
  21. TBRaiders
    Clash, Hades had no nukes when you hit us. i am going to link the thread and start reposting/quoting stats from that thread if you keep this up. Every nation that hit us was a down declare. Had TPC not hit NS, you were certainly in our crosshairs for payback last round, but the payback was delayed. Inst, I posted stats above. There was nobody we were going to hit where down declare wasn't cried. Sure we could have added another couple alliances and got the total NS up there, but the nuke advantage and ANS was going to be there regardless and had we added another 50 nations our smaller nations would all be getting rolled. We certainly should have went to war sooner and it is a lesson learned.
  22. TBRaiders
    I was in Hades last round Clash. I wasn't going to go down that road, but you want to attempt to rewrite history that is just a few pages back. You hit both of our AA's last round at day 24, Five days after our wars officially ended while it was your first war of the round. You keep spouting about ANS, but the nations you attacked us with had a higher ANS. Pretty easy to lower your ANS when you carry a dozen crap nations below 2K ns. This is simply payback, but we gave you more time and we added a capable ally for you instead of tossing in a micro without nukes for fluff NS. You guys should totally try to get a coalition together behind our backs to roll us...oh wait...
  23. TBRaiders
    I'm waiting for the call, the hand on the chest, I'm ready for the fight, and fate The sound of iron shots is stuck in my head, The thunder of the drums dictates, The rhythm of the falls, the number of deaths, The rising of the hordes ahead, From the dawn of time to the end of days, I will have to run, away, I want to feel the pain and the bitter taste Of the blood on my lips, again Citadel has been in peace for way too many days. We are tired of hugging our infra, and want to change our hippy songs for songs of war, and death. We have a debt with The Warriors, for the two wars they declared on us the last round, without an offensive war from us against them. We owe one war to OP too, so here we are. Before Citadelians start warring each other out of boredom, Citadel declares war on The Warriors and Ordo Paradoxia. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The above is what our leader Dark Zone Elite was scheduled to post for our DoW. Sorry it is late, but he had to finish attacks and then deal with another issue so I am posting on his behalf. Below is the data I gathered when I made target lists and my thoughts. We have declared war on the 57 nations in OP and Warriors at 2K NS and above. The stats were taken at 1800 game time today from copying down the nation data on the alliance pages. We have more top heavy nations and it was unavoidable at this point that no matter who we declared on it was going to be a down declare due to our nuke count. We talked about possibly having our nations who are fighting non-nuke capable opponents not using nukes, but we were reminded of Paul's words from just over a week ago and the general crap behavior from Warriors (weasels who like to call others weasels). We will leave it up to individual fire teams whether they want to use one or more nukes on their opponents. I imagine the kind of spy ops warriors like to use against us can play into those types of decisions.
  24. TBRaiders
    Man you are such a cry baby. Were you bottle fed?
  25. TBRaiders
    Solid war, TPC. You guys should both have a lot of fun.
×
×
  • Create New...