Crymson

Welcome, tovarischi.

I truly thought this day would come. All props to our Polar buddies.

Irrational ranting is a common symptom of Pink Elephant Syndrome. I'd like to point you toward some applicable resources for your condition. Some very helpful information can be found [url=http://www.webmd.com/alzheimers/tc/dementia-treatment-overview]here[/url]. That aside, I obviously do care about Cybernations, else I'd not participate at all. That is, however, worlds apart from being concerned about the inane dialogue of berbers and others like him.

You appear to be suffering from an advanced case of Pink Elephant Syndrome. Seek help from your nearest imaginary health professional at once!

You appear to have developed the odd impression that people actually place importance upon your opinions. Is this phenomenon limited to you, or has the remainder of your alliance become similarly deluded?

Yikes! That is an abomination, though I suspect every IO has the NPO equivalent. Only $80 for the privilege of wearing the Pacifican star over your junk: Pacifica prevails! This is a very common means of self-consolation. Rarely does it have any basis in reality.

I wonder if they still sell merchandise.

Is this the best that NPO's propaganda division can muster?

I'll be very sad for anyone who is still playing Cybernations in six months.

I don't think you could possibly have worded this any more poorly.

Any TOP member below the rank of member should not post in this thread.

It's not interesting at all, as Cheeky never was in TOP. He was briefly pending on our AA while he considered application. At no point was he under our protection; FARK was made directly aware of this. We have several nations still at war who are applicants to the alliance and so are currently pending on our AA (they will not be allowed to join until they attain peace and are cleared by TDO). They are likewise not under our protection, and TDO & company have likewise been made aware of this. Also, the idea that $27m for a nation of his size constitutes "full pockets" is more than a bit silly, as is the notion of a theretofore uninvolved nation using an AA "for cover" from which to declare.

Explain, please. Again, please explain. As TDO & company are not attacking MQ nations that are at peace and remain so, those nations would not need our protection. Furthermore, you apparently missed the segment in which I said that all applicants must be at peace anyway, and that all are cleared with the necessary alliances before being allowed to embark officially upon the application process. Regardless of circumstances, no nation wishing to join TOP receives the protection afforded an applicant until they've fulfilled the conditions necessary to become an applicant. The issue of reparations is one that would be handled between TDO and the individual nations in question. As can, once again, be verified by the alliances concerned, we have made no efforts to negotiate on the behalf of the applicants; each nation is responsible for securing peace on its own. That said, TDO has voiced no interest in asking for reparations from anybody. Nor, indeed, have GOP, CCC, TTE, or NATO (I am unaware of the policies of TPF and FARK on this issue). If you have issue with their handling of this war that they are involved in but you are not, then I suggest that you take this up with them rather than me. See above. I can't speak to that. If it does indeed come to pass, it could be the result of several factors---namely deletions, departures to join the war, and departures to join other alliances---all of which are vastly more likely than the theory that you are advancing.

It's clear at this point that you've completely ignored what I posted. I guess it's just slander after all.

Since there appears to be significant confusion over the issue, I'll clarify in as detailed a matter as possible. Our protection of the MK AA after its disbandment was exceedingly standard. It is absolutely usual for close allies of a disbanded alliance to protect the latter's alliance affiliation for some period afterward. Often this period is an extended one. Sometimes the protection is indefinite. Whatever the case, the purpose is to protect those nations that desire to remain on the AA while they decide their future course of action. We have not extended our protection to any nation that went to war with TDO or anyone else, as those nations willingly chose to go rogue. If you want confirmation of this, feel free to ask any of the alliances involved. We have had some queries as to if this or that ex-MK nation at war with TDO/whoever else is under our protection. The answer has always been "no." Indeed, we have not stepped into protect any ex-MK nation at all, period, including those who have habitated peacefully on the AA since the disbandment; to their credit, TDO and its co-combatants have not attacked any of the latter. To my knowledge, not a single one of the nations that went rogue on TDO has attempted to claim TOP protection in the process. If I am incorrect and they have done so, then they did so wrongly and have earned our enmity for abusing our gesture made in good faith. Several ex-MK nations that had gone rogue on TDO have applied to join TOP. Their applications have been put on hold while we have contacted TDO and its co-combatants to establish a procedure by which these nations can individually negotiate an exit from the war. Each nation is being individually cleared before being considered for admission. If you don't believe me, then feel free to corroborate my claim with those alliances. As per our admissions process, each applicant is being considered individually, on his own merits, and in accordance with procedure; we have never bent our admissions standards to admit applicants as a group or en masse, nor will we ever do so. Anybody who has ever been in TOP can verify this. Contrary to the claim that conspiracy theorists are circulating, TOP did not have substantial foreknowledge of MK's impending disbandment. We were informed four hours before the event. The rest of MK's allies were likewise blindsided; GOONS, for example, received 20 minutes' notice. While we are flattered at your belief in our facility and cleverness, there was no intricate plot at play, and indeed the net effect of MK's departure was that we lost one of our closest allies. This was not an advantageous event for us. If anyone has any further questions to ask or details to bring up, please do so. Should you instead choose to point fingers and wave about flimsy accusations, then you will prove that your mission is simply one of slander rather than one of justice.

In my honest opinion, you're both morons. If global stability is what you're looking for, you probably shouldn't be playing Cybernations.

Shouldn't you be working on those TPS reports? I'll get you another copy of that memo.

Four pages in more than 24 hours. Cybernations is in a truly sorry state.

Uh oh! Guess what day it is? Guess what day it is!

We enjoy you when you're friendly, but we learned years ago to tune you out when you're unfriendly. You'd be best off spending your time on other pursuits.

That is an isolated attack on Hot55.

Agreed. Say what you will about MK, but they were many times more successful in this game than your alliance is likely to ever be.

I can't be bothered to do it either. He knows I have no time for him anyway.

This is weak, even for you.

Cause no trouble.