[The Greatest News Of All Time]

edmonton is still gonna be terrible

[GOD post war synopsis]

I have numbers. All numbers.

First lets take a look at total damage from all alliances on the GATO front (GATO, GOD, RIA, TTK, CRAP)

CRAP

Nation Strength-- 201,484

Score-- 0.72

Infrastructure-- 47,049

Technology-- 8,729

TTK

Nation Strength-- 620,565

Score-- 2.21

Infrastructure-- 124,247

Technology-- 22,369

RIA

Nation Strength-- 1,038,663

Score-- 3.67

Infrastructure-- 223,791

Technology-- 35,804

GOD

Nation Strength-- 427,412

Score-- 1.51

Infrastructure-- 109,801

Technology-- 11,508

GATO

Nation Strength-- 2,247,476

Score-- 8.07

Infrastructure-- 421,962

Technology-- 79,351

So for a better viewing of these numbers and total damage done, i will combine all the people against GATO, so we can see how much damage they dealt compared to received

GATO | OTHER SIDE

Nation Strength-- 2,247,476 | 2,288,124

Score-- 8.07 | 8.11

Infrastructure-- 421,962 | 504,888

Technology-- 79,351 | 78,410

Now, from that stat is can be seen that GATO did *Slightly* more damage combined to all the alliances combined, than GATO took. That is, until we bring up multiple fronts (GOD vs. UPN and RIA vs. IAA, SLCB, Exodus)

Now for the next set of stats. War slot stats.

(Note: these are not nearly as accurate as previous stats as I was not able to collect them daily, but got them every other day)

RIA: 57% of total wars were with GATO

110 / 148 defensive (GATO / Total)

65 / 154 offensive (GATO / Total)

175 / 302 total (GATO / Total)

GOD: 44% of total wars were with GATO

19 / 29 defensive (GATO / Total)

58 / 146 offensive (GATO / Total)

77 / 175 total (GATO / Total)

[Don't Turtle]

turtling a a valid tactic. There is no point in losing max 24 million dollars a day in GAs (that's if you have full slots, lose all attacking and defending GAs) when you can just sit there, lob nukes, and not lose the money

[Disbandment, moralism and some leader]

Sorry guys, I don't know what you're talking about

http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?searchstring=Declaring_Alliance%2CReceiving_Alliance&search=Global%20Order%20of%20Darkness&anyallexact=exact

I don't see any wars

[Forced Disbandment Hurr Hurr Durr]

I never understood the carlos accord jokes, but I figured if wickedj was saying them, they were bound to be stupid

[Disbandment, moralism and some leader]

Lol, twist it anyway you want, you know as well as I do that there is no reasoning with Xiph about giving UPN white peace.

The GATO and FHU peace agreements are normal yes, but they do not in any way cancel out what Xiph is trying to pull on UPN.

Kinda hard to give an alliance white peace when we aren't even at war

[Disbandment, moralism and some leader]

Its clear we differ in opinion here, I think a no re-entry clause is something that secures your allies and yourselves, because it prevents an alliance from hopping in and out of war when it suits them. The alliance which signs the clause isn't hurt in any way (economically, military or any other way.

Anyways, I was writing this blog because someone is trying to play some sort of evil overlord-admin here, which is very wrong.

I mean, you obviously hate what GOD is doing in this war. We are so terrible because we have given out white peace to our only targets this war. GATO received white peace with no clause dealing with re-entry after about 1-2 weeks of war, and Flying Hellfish United rexeived white peace with a no re-entry clause.

We are so immoral compared to your view of CN, it's just disgusting.

[Disbandment, moralism and some leader]

Ah no re-entry clause might be a term, but it's nothing compared to ruining someones economy, destroying improvements and wonders or forcing a community to dissolve because of some dickhead's ego.

A term is a term and being someone who is against terms, you should also be against no re-entry clauses.

[Disbandment, moralism and some leader]

lawlz at CptGodzilla trying to deflect. while "no re-entry clause" is a term, it is still basically white peace since no other actual terms are being enforced. it is far more of a white peace than if you asked for reps, decoms, or any such. a no re-entry clause is almost usually expected as a standard clause nowadays. particularly if the war is still ongoing.

also, i agree with most here in that going for disbandment should be barred from CN. those asking it should get shunned to ensure they do not have the capability of demanding it.

as for staying in the war, if all alliances left GOD on the battlefield alone, pretty sure that GOD could not force a disbandment of UPN on their own particularly if UPN's allies stay in to continue to fight. at some point, just being an ally of an alliance asking for disbandment is not enough. ya'll should have the balls to leave them on the battlefield to stand up for your own morals especially if GOD does not respect their own allies or friends enough to listen.

So if you are ever on the winning side of a war, you don't plan on enforcing a no re-entry clause?

that's good to know.

[Disbandment, moralism and some leader]

you do know a "no re-entry cluause" is actually a term, so you aren't actually against terms.

[So, Nordreich]

For every action there is a reaction. When they originally said that they didnt realise SF were going to extort DT under threat of eternal war. I wouldnt expect a member of VE to understand. When an alliance acts like an asshat it has far reaching consequences

refusing to pay reps does not equal eternal war

[Green Muffins Up to No Good]

Well in all honest, the only reason HavoK was in the is because someone gave him a heads up on what was happening.

[Standards for Leadership in This Era of Cybernations]

This was a nice read.

Overall your statements make a lot of sense.

Perhaps you should write the book on "Being an Alliance Leader for D.U.M.M.I.E.S."

Cheers,

R.

I think the whole point of this was saying, If you need a book on "Being an alliance leader for DUMMIES" then you shouldn't be an alliance leader at all.

Either that or I just read too much into it.