Jump to content

Hydro

Members
  • Posts

    1,186
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hydro

  1. If you want a war, go declare on someone. Stop expecting people to do your dirty work and whining when they don't. Eeesh.
  2. So you're trying to insult someone by airing private corrispondence over a public forum and then making insinuations about their honor? Irony much...
  3. The thing that I really wonder about, is when was the last time you and/or your alliance was contacted by mhawk to conduct operations against Athens? I might've missed it and if I did, I apologize, but the thread has been going a little too fast for me. Thanks.
  4. Congradulations. This kind of steady growth is impressive, especially considering that it's so consistent.
  5. Competition actually. Again, stabbing people in the back is more your fortay.
  6. Because you're the benchmark for good policies? I suppose I'm not giving you credit though; if we're ever in the market for stabbing our friends in the back, we'll be sure to consult you first. Apparently, you're something of an expert.
  7. What's wrong with black holes? Without them we wouldn't have galaxies. Only a truly wonderful person would make black holes. Thanks love.
  8. I was just questioning his criteria for success. \m/ doesn't need even a single treaty to be successful. So long as you can establish an effective, working community then in my opinion you've succeded. As it stands, I think it's too early to criticize this new \m/, as many here seem all too wiling to do. The world simply doesn't know enough about \m/ to make any sort of intelligent critique on your alliance. In that spirit, I wish you good luck and look forward to seeing what this new \m/ will accomplish for itself.
  9. Hmmm...Not sure if I got this right, but these two statements seem to be in pretty stark contrast. I fail to see how integrating into the treaty web is something that should be lauded as even remotely successful You don't need intra-alliance treaties to be part of a successful alliance: consider FAN. If anything, I'd be say that the more connected an alliance is to the treaty web, the weaker they actuallly become (With few exceptions).
  10. OOC:You need to learn to distinguish between different verbs. Demand and request: different verbs. Don't worry though, learning a new language can be a difficult task and we all go at different speeds. Good luck!
  11. The inside man was found last night and was introduced to the boot.
  12. You've expressed this opinion for a long time now. It means as much as it did then as it does now. To ensure there's no misunderstanding, Youwish does not have the powers to offer a treaty. He was being facetious. [OOC] I feel compelled to say how distasteful I find this. If you have an issue with us, then post about it in an IC manner. Don't go onto 4chan, make some crappy posts while pretending to be one of us then screenshot it and claim it was us.[OOC]
  13. More to the point, how is it possible that this topic actually got worse from the OP?
  14. Hydro

    Buying tech

    Can't say I'm liking this Whiteman. I really don't like my tech traders to be deleted before I can get my tech. edit: still 2 slots open
  15. CCC with GATO a close second, NpO with STA a close second and Vox. I also saw people were voting for ODN. Very funny
  16. That's precisely why I think your nation is a joke. At 200 days you shouldn't have as much crap as you have because you're not going to have a warchest. There are nations with half your NS that I'd rather go into combat with because they wouldn't get bill-locked within the first week. The reason I don't have an SDI is because I've tried to get my nation battle ready, unlike you (There's also been a few wars that have knocked my nation around but that's beside the point). That means building up a warchest, at bare minimum, so that I'm not a liability to my alliance. Were you in even a half-assed alliance, you'd be ordered to stop all spending and build up a warchest, so that you don't lose it all within the first 2 weeks.
  17. No dispute here. I just found his nation development to be particularly annoying.
  18. What you are seeking is the Moldavi Doctrine, which was established to disseminate this paradigm. edit: You're in no position to be making these kinds of insults. Return when your nation has some spies, a SDI, a warchest and is part of a relevant alliance.
  19. These forums need shark week again
×
×
  • Create New...