Jump to content

Voodoo Nova

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,725

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Blog Comments posted by Voodoo Nova

  3. wickedj

    Posted

    Jesus christ, wickedj, just shut the $%&@ up already.
    Prove him wrong then.

    Given a choice between proving wickedj wrong and ignoring our allies, I know which choice I would make every time.

    Put another way: $%&@ off and die. If you want to see our balls, come over here.

    (As a note - we've actually never had Legion fight a war in defense of us. We once fought a war in defense of Legion.)

    It seems a chord has been struck and you're singing to the tune.

  9. Penkala

    Posted

    Yes... war can cause them a lot of damage so they're cowering to avoid it. That's literally my point. What are you arguing against it for?

    And please pay attention this time: They Said They Would Be Going Down But Would FIGHT For A Long Time To BLOODY Us. Instead They Went To Peace Mode. The Reason They Shouldn't Is Because By Doing So, They Don't Live Up To What They Said They Would Do.

    I've said it multiple times already and people keep asking "why SHOULDN'T they go to peace mode?". The answer is: because they said they'd go down fighting. Now they're going down hiding.

    I fail to see the issue. They realized their mistake, a random member stated that, etc. Any reason could have changed their mindset and what is wrong with that?

  10. Penkala

    Posted

    Yes. That tends to happen when you enter 6v1 fights for over a month, including against several nations with nukes. :unsure: I mean I could have declared maybe one war at a time, or fought for a round of wars and then run to peace mode like IRON... I'd have saved more infra that way...

    You must have forgotten IRON is also in a war in which they are greatly outnumbered, (yes, they started it. No, I don't care what you think, they are currently the outnumbered ones) that could cause them a lot of damage if they haphazardly sent nations to war. How does one minimize damage for their alliance? Hitting peace mode to ensure long term survivability of the alliance's economy.

    Also, if IRON nations had the opportunity to reach peace mode, why shouldn't they take it if they know they'll be slaughtered?

  12. Penkala

    Posted

    Yes, cowering to protect infra is a good strategy to protect infra. But it's still cowering. And from an alliance who, along with its allies, declared it would bloody CnG and SF on the way down, it's sure not very effective to cower. Hint: you're not bloodying me very much from peace mode. :awesome:

    It seems they dropped you nearly all of your NS to 712, before CSN aided you. I'd say they got you pretty well. Also, who are you referring to when you say "you're"?

  13. Penkala

    Posted

    Do you see the world in black and white or do you understand shades of gray? Hitting peace mode to leave nuclear anarchy, collect, and buy 25 nukes is a tactic. If you come back out, that is. If you sit in peace mode, you're not using it as a tactic. You're hiding. If you can't understand the difference then you are in no position to tell me anything about tactics because you know nothing about war.

    Both cycling and staying in peace mode is a useful tactic. One is to be able to continue causing damage (those with good sized warchests) and the other to completely minimize damage. GATO did it in GATO-1v until NPO threatened them with PZI for each of them. FAN kept in peace mode during their war, among other tactics. To say that sitting in peace mode to minimize damage to your alliance really shows you do not know much about a long term defensive war. They are ensuring their ability to be able to rebuild quicker and are thinking in the long run about the future of their alliance after the war.

×
×
  • Create New...