Jump to content
  • entries
    33
  • comments
    544
  • views
    14,202

Betting time


wickedj

402 views

 Share

So folks, time to put up some tech and cash on a bit of a sucker bet.

As we all recently saw Invicta was MORE than happy to let Legion get their heads kicked in, now SOS Brigade has been declared on(some say theres no CB, but thats for a different time and place to argue) and they too hold a treaty with Invicta which Legion is proud to inform us is optional(ironic Legion will happily defend Invicta but not the reverse)

So, lets place the bets. i got 50 tech says Invicta sits on the sidelines and watches another ally burn. Anyone care to counter that? if they grow a backbone you could collect a decent pot if enough people chime in

 Share

20 Comments


Recommended Comments

Legion's getting their head kicked in?Also, Invicta downgraded several days ago.
Why sign a treaty if you have no intention of using it, optional or not

Quoted for truth. If Invicta doesn't defend SOS and I was allied to Invicta, I'd be questioning why I was still allied to Invicta.

Link to comment

I am backing Invicta and have taken 3 bets so far

Nobody Expects = 50 Tech

Wickedj = 50 Tech

arexes = 2 offensive GA's with no return.

Whilst I am not taking anymore bets, I do encourage everyone to get behind Invicta, and support them in this cause (basically, I want to attack arexes for more offensive casualties)

Invicta, please don't betray The Pansy

Link to comment

I'll bet 50 tech that PC and iFOK sit on the sidelines while NEW gets rolled. Oh wait... we arent playing that game now... we are playing NG rolls SOS.. ok cool same bet just swap the names around so Im still gunning for Invicta to sit this one out.

Link to comment

I bet 50 tech that wickedj wont shut up baiting alliances about being "cowards"just because he wants escalation, if bored go rogue wickedj stop asking people to make fun for you.

Link to comment

I'll bet 50 tech that PC and iFOK sit on the sidelines while NEW gets rolled. Oh wait... we arent playing that game now... we are playing NG rolls SOS.. ok cool same bet just swap the names around so Im still gunning for Invicta to sit this one out.

For the record i gave PC and iFOK some serious !@#$(Can i use the "t" word in blogs?) and even got yelled at by Athens gov for it

I bet 50 tech that wickedj wont shut up baiting alliances about being "cowards"just because he wants escalation, if bored go rogue wickedj stop asking people to make fun for you.

Shoot, im no good at this...should i say "no u" right now? or is "bring it" more applicable?

Link to comment

I'll bet 50 tech that PC and iFOK sit on the sidelines while NEW gets rolled. Oh wait... we arent playing that game now... we are playing NG rolls SOS.. ok cool same bet just swap the names around so Im still gunning for Invicta to sit this one out.

thats suggesting SOS and NEW share the same amount of intellect

Link to comment

Shoot, im no good at this...should i say "no u" right now? or is "bring it" more applicable?

Take that as you aren't taking me up on the bet?

Dont get your knickers in a twist over a bet.

Link to comment
Why sign a treaty if you have no intention of using it, optional or not

I can not speak as to Invicta's intent, however some feel that optional is important as a treaty should have intent NOT to be used unless the cause is just. Not arguing whether or not this is just nor if that was Invicta's idea behind the optional. Wanted to point out though that not everyone views it necessary or even proper to support allies if said allies have done something not worthy of support. Thus why they sign treaties with optional clauses. The intent or lack thereof is dependent entirely upon the justifications of the situation.

Now I would also point out however that if we are trying to mind read Invicta, it doesnt seem very logical to claim they are being cowardly here. Past actions have shown them willingly jumping into a fire for an ally. Thus the onus is on a detractor to justify a claim of cowardice.

Link to comment
Jesus christ, wickedj, just shut the $%&@ up already.
Prove him wrong then.

Given a choice between proving wickedj wrong and ignoring our allies, I know which choice I would make every time.

Put another way: $%&@ off and die. If you want to see our balls, come over here.

(As a note - we've actually never had Legion fight a war in defense of us. We once fought a war in defense of Legion.)

Link to comment
Jesus christ, wickedj, just shut the $%&@ up already.
Prove him wrong then.
Given a choice between proving wickedj wrong and ignoring our allies, I know which choice I would make every time.Put another way: $%&@ off and die. If you want to see our balls, come over here.(As a note - we've actually never had Legion fight a war in defense of us. We once fought a war in defense of Legion.)

Actually, I was referring to the NG-SOS war, and that sort.

It seems that Invicta is much more skeptical of assisting SOS in a fight that some people believe is a belligerent attack against them. This is especially disturbing since how Invicta was ready to support them in their last conflict.

Link to comment
Jesus christ, wickedj, just shut the $%&@ up already.
Prove him wrong then.

Given a choice between proving wickedj wrong and ignoring our allies, I know which choice I would make every time.

Put another way: $%&@ off and die. If you want to see our balls, come over here.

(As a note - we've actually never had Legion fight a war in defense of us. We once fought a war in defense of Legion.)

It seems a chord has been struck and you're singing to the tune.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...