Lord Caspian

[quote name='Antoine Roquentin' timestamp='1297332471' post='2627869'] To be fair, unlike Pacific, Polar actually cycles them out and have consistently fought the war. So some color changes may be in order. [/quote] Personally I haven't seen this, but you're not the first to offer the criticism so I reckon it's probably me just not watching the stats enough.

[URL=http://img64.imageshack.us/i/pho1da.jpg/][IMG]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/3535/pho1da.jpg[/IMG][/URL] Very first attempt at propaganda

[quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1296500556' post='2613211'] rep talk is one of the first things they point out. In fact, I think that was the first thing Sardonic said in our DoW. [/quote] [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1296500580' post='2613212'] It was already mentioned by GOONs in a different thread. [/quote] [quote name='mhawk' timestamp='1296500688' post='2613216'] Check out the CoJ, NSO, and other DoW's for generic sardonic/william quotes on reps. [/quote] Sorry, I don't bother reading through those $#!+ storms, but yeah ok looks like you're right. Still, I hardly imagine it's because they're "bloodied" that they're taking delight in the thought of reps.

[quote name='mhawk' timestamp='1296498450' post='2613182'] You guys are a joke. You offensively attack an alliance for no coherent reason, then when you get bloodied a bit all you talk about is reparations. What a sad group. [/quote] err... that's the first I've seen of reps talk in this thread, and Hal brought it up

[quote name='Mathias' timestamp='1296481051' post='2612946'] Look at who wrote the OP and you'll have your answer. [/quote] I was surprised nobody brought this up sooner... I'm into character assassinations, but really Damsky? Just drop the attention-seeking

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1296232730' post='2607506'] What you're on the wrong side of the war to laugh at my jokes. -10 bias points for you [/quote] Must remember to put my unthinking drone hat on next time I post on the OWF

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1296206181' post='2607230'] This is a valuable thread and people will be glad it was posted. [/quote] I *chuckled*- touche good sir

[quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1296218125' post='2607340'] I'm a baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad man. [/quote] You give me chills all down my spine you sexy Cadogan

Edit: nvm, i stand corrected as to reasons why VE lost more than Polar.

[quote name='MrMuz' timestamp='1295912542' post='2597316'] Very nice work. I think the "Where's the heat" map is better judged by the total score of alliances that they are at war with, subtracted by that alliance's current score. SLCB is fighting two alliances much bigger than them, it doesn't describe that pain even as much. [/quote] I was thinking you could add them to the alliances score and give an impression of how much score is "involved", but your idea seems better. [quote name='Decomposition' timestamp='1296057491' post='2602763'] Truly awesome visual representation. My only gripe is that you appear to use radius of the circle as representing NS of an alliance. Total surface area of the circle might be better since the radius is obviously squared in determining area. This means that large alliances look much larger than they should in comparison to smaller alliances. [/quote] Yeah, was thinking this also. Great job though, these stats are really appreciated and presented in the most clear form I've seen.

Looks like Sparta took a pretty hefty hit. I'm not 100% sure, but I believe the reason our loss is not larger is due to a 40kNS nation joining.

Good luck in RL april

[quote name='LJ Scott' timestamp='1296000480' post='2601260'] My glory comes in the morning. [/quote] I *chuckled*

Still around eh?

Still love you guys.

[quote name='Bergerland' timestamp='1295776203' post='2593730'] So what you're saying is that you only catch a glimpse of a [i]shadow[/i] when he attacks? (Yes, to everybody who got that, I acknowledge it was terrible and I should feel terrible.) [/quote] [12:33] <ber[glow]ini> Yeah. Besides my jokes are terrible, so don't feel bad. Shoutout to Randall Flagg- it's been great fun fighting you and you're still putting in the effort which is great (though not for my nation).

That's a lot of lovely losses.

[quote name='Crymson' timestamp='1295661099' post='2590206'] So the best we have to go by is your word. Wonderful. [/quote] I have sometimes wondered why people feel so enamoured with RV's elaborate "no u" responses. Maybe it's because they're blue.

[quote name='Ruler with Plan X' timestamp='1295376342' post='2581686'] If I remember right it was Physicsjunkie who we apologized for [/quote] I stand corrected (I'm assuming you went back to check since you pulled another quote from there). As I said, I was working from memory. *hat-tip*

[quote name='Arcturus Jefferson' timestamp='1295368619' post='2581482'] Riiiiiight. Your diplomatic mastery is unchallenged, champ. [/quote] From what I remember, Fark apologized for your behaviour in that thread as well so you've hardly got a leg to stand on.

[quote name='Gopherbashi' timestamp='1295320871' post='2579757'] The sanction race itself should give you a good indication - since I didn't do commentary, iFOK's score would've been taken roughly 3-5 minutes pre-DoW, and Polar/VE's maybe five minutes before that. The war stats are never going to be horribly accurate on an alliance basis - they're based on the All Alliances Display, which is anywhere from 0 to 12 hours old. Its point is moreso the overall picture when you get wars involving hundreds of alliances - individual alliances will be off, but that should impact both sides fairly equally. If I tried to take real-time stats for 100+ alliances, I'd go crazy. [/quote] Yeah I meant the ASR update, sorry should've clarified. And yeah, your job is crazy enough without bothering with the real-time stats.

So the stats were taken immediately pre-DoW then? That should mean that tomorrows update should give a more clear indicator of the first day of war then we often get if I read your previous comment correctly.

[quote name='Voytek' timestamp='1292488685' post='2540803'] Are you calling MHA smug? Surely you jest. [/quote] They are, after all, on 'top'.

Good to see.

[quote name='Diomede' timestamp='1292358249' post='2539639'] Welcome to the CN of 2011. [/quote] yeah, but this one in particular is a great shame.