Smacky

[quote name='Penlugue Solaris' date='21 February 2010 - 10:27 PM' timestamp='1266820079' post='2196696'] Hold on. Did you seriously just try to call JB incompetent, considering who you are? [b]Pathetic.[/b] [/quote] Pretty much my opinion minus the sarcasm.

[quote name='Jrenster' date='21 February 2010 - 08:19 PM' timestamp='1266812379' post='2196138'] The reps being paid are simply ludicrous. Total, it's about $112 billion (my math may be off). Punishing them this harshly just for trying to be loyal is simply outrageous. [/quote] May be off? LOL, try way off. @ $800,000 per 50 tech (it's actually less then that) the total cost of 40,000 tech is $640,000,000. Hardly a drop in the bucket for a 365 member alliances with a horde of sellers. Congrats Sparta and Umbrella, another one bit the dust.

[quote name='SupremePrince' date='19 February 2010 - 10:45 PM' timestamp='1266648340' post='2193245'] They were just following treaties. If your allies ask you to activate the oA part, you would do the same knowing how PC love aggression. [/quote] You don't get it. TFD and NATO are the lowest of the PEA alliances and they're getting off the easiest. Something stinks here.

TFD and NATO got off far too easy for what they did, what a load of horse !@#$. When you all get to calculating reps for TOP and IRON they better be proportional to that, or you can at least have the decency to admit you're only treating them differently because you're all too !@#$% to follow through equally.

[quote name='The AUT' date='18 February 2010 - 02:30 AM' timestamp='1266489037' post='2189495'] The government runs for Poison Clan? We need an illustration for that. [/quote] Your time frame is off. A few buccaneers including a minority of the captains joined Poison Clan to help give a bloody nose to Grub's police state, this was more then a week before FoB was attacked. By the way, weren't you one of the shills insisting we were just ghosting and would be back in FoB as soon as that war was over? [quote name='The AUT' date='18 February 2010 - 02:30 AM' timestamp='1266489037' post='2189495'] [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=80463"]Cool story, man.[/url] [/quote] [quote name='Smacky' date='18 February 2010 - 02:23 AM' timestamp='1266488636' post='2189488'] Our decision to [i]defend[/i] FAN isn't in anyway comparable to chaining three times over into a [b]preemptive strike[/b]. [/quote] Whatever other point you were trying to make died halfway out the birthing canal. Chaining treaties to help defend allies isn't anywhere close to the same thing as what NATO and TFD did to FoB.

[quote name='Alterego' date='18 February 2010 - 02:13 AM' timestamp='1266488018' post='2189480'] Here is a reminder of how you entered the war. [/quote] Tongue in cheek. Or did you already forget how this war got started in the first place? Our decision to [i]defend[/i] FAN isn't in anyway comparable to chaining three times over into a preemptive strike.

No, I'll leave the educatin' for you and your boys.

[quote name='John Warbuck' date='18 February 2010 - 02:10 AM' timestamp='1266487805' post='2189479'] Oh, I know. And I'll give them credit for being experienced at war and a tough challenge. I'm just pointing out that everyone thought Troy would pwn us and we did better than people expected. I look forward to this challenge and am pleased to take it on with our great friends in LSN. [/quote] NOBODY thought Troy was going to do well against those kind of odds. Even against a few joke alliances they got themselves in over their heads by overextending without any ready backup on that front. Claiming a victory there isn't exactly a credit to your formidable might.

[quote name='John Warbuck' date='18 February 2010 - 02:05 AM' timestamp='1266487517' post='2189473'] The same was once said of Troy... [/quote] GOONS ain't Troy bub.

LOL, I'm so jealous of GOONS. They get to take down ADI [i]and[/i] their !@#$%^&*.

[quote name='Shinpah' date='17 February 2010 - 11:29 PM' timestamp='1266478195' post='2189201'] While I can't speak for the rest of the combatants, there is a special place in [s]my heart[/s] the depths of hell for those who oA into a CB-less war I'm looking at you NATO and TFD [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/facepalm.gif[/img] [/quote] NATO and TFD's choice of entry was particularly despicable, not only did they chain oAs supporting TTIFERGITTHEACRONYM'S preemptive strike but they did in the most yellow bellied way possible, to then debase themselves into begging for reparationless peace is only the cherry on top. They'll learn what happens when you cramp a buccaneer's style. [img]http://www.maritime-connector.com/Administration/_Upload/LargeImages/pirate-6[1].jpg[/img]

[quote name='Haflinger' date='16 February 2010 - 11:26 PM' timestamp='1266391577' post='2187283'] Then who is defending FAN? Please let this not be like the GLOF-57th situation. [/quote] Your memory sucks. PC declared in defense of FAN because they're cool in our book, DT rolled with PC pursuant to our MADP, NoR was invited to the party through their MDoAP with DT. See? It all makes sense if you use your thinker.

TL;DR: Karma is just as bad as the hegemony. Or worse!

[quote name='Haflinger' date='15 February 2010 - 09:09 PM' timestamp='1266296978' post='2184681'] Good luck UCN. PC targets are ... kinda fun I'm told [/quote] Fun like getting half your alliance blown away in a week fun. Let's rock this!

Contributed to what? You and BC were either incompetent or double agents. Either way I'll just lay our new tyranny at your feet if that makes you feel more important.

[quote name='PrinceArutha' date='12 February 2010 - 08:50 PM' timestamp='1266036637' post='2178622'] http://www.nuevavida-cn.net/forums/viewforum.php?f=4 join now and all your dreams can come true. and we have the wimminz. :-) haha [/quote] http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?search=281915&Extended=1 No thanks, the wimminz are sleazier over here.

[quote name='GearHead' date='13 February 2010 - 01:11 AM' timestamp='1266052268' post='2179017'] Wait, you expected TFD and NATO not to roll together? That. Is. Hilarious. [/quote] Right. With all of NATO's allies being [i]attacked[/i] and in need of [i]defense[/i], they decided to come in on an oA a week late on the weakest alliance of the seven TOP/IRON/TORN/DAWN/TSO declared on. And you decided to join them despite your other allies being [i]attacked[/i] and in need of [i]defense[/i]. Don't pretty it up, you two were just looking for the least painful way to enter the war.

[quote name='Katsumi' date='12 February 2010 - 02:47 PM' timestamp='1266014878' post='2178235'] In order from most active to least active: Grämlins, MK, Umbrella, Poison Clan, TOP, SOS Brigade, Fark, New Polar Order, FOK, BAPS, IRON, NSO, Valhalla, iFOK, Athens, Legion, ODN, New Pacific Order, Sparta, Ragnarok, Viridian Entente, MHA, Monos Archein, World Task Force Or something like that. [/quote] There's no way The Grämlins are more active then MK. They're active but I wouldn't even place them in the top 10. PC is pretty active but 4th seems too charitable. We might be accurately ranked around 10th, give or take a few spots.

[quote name='ROMMELHSQ' date='12 February 2010 - 03:18 AM' timestamp='1265973534' post='2177407'] I don't know about score, but there have been few days where CnG side lost more total NS than our side. [/quote] Considering there's twice as many nations on our side, if losses are equal it just means you're dropping twice as fast.

[quote name='Lord Gobb' date='12 February 2010 - 03:43 PM' timestamp='1266018188' post='2178322'] Thank you Nueva Vida, Stickmen and whoever else on them. You're living my dream! [/quote] It's my dream too, but I get to live it. If I could get even one to competently fight back there may even be some nocturnal emissions.

[quote name='thaone' date='12 February 2010 - 12:21 PM' timestamp='1266006063' post='2178007'] Try to bandwagon your $@! in here PC, we can finaly fight an alliance without you [/quote] Why not?

Don't fergit, purple is for lovers!

[quote name='Seipher Caim' date='03 February 2010 - 01:52 AM' timestamp='1265190738' post='2156168'] I find your lack of humor in your own DoW a bit disappointing... but hey.. it's your DoW.. so ok... I'll put this on the fact that you didnt get the reference of this excellent movie Once again, have fun in hunting us, those little cowards who decided to hit an alliance who is best known for their refusal to surrender for more than 2 years and with now more than twice our members and NS... [/quote] It's a humorous picture, though a bit of an accusation at the same time. If you don't want a serious response don't imply PC is only here for revenge. [quote] o/ Casualties o/ Nukes[/quote] Something we can agree on.

[quote name='The Big Bad' date='03 February 2010 - 01:45 AM' timestamp='1265190317' post='2156162'] Wow FAN and MK getting thier butts kicked in this war. Almost like someone is taking out the opposition. [/quote] 120k NS lost after a couple days of nuking is hardly a butt kicking, and never mind that MK's losses are less then both TOP and IRON's. If you have a point it's not a good one.

[quote name='Seipher Caim' date='03 February 2010 - 01:29 AM' timestamp='1265189357' post='2156148'] [img]http://storage.canalblog.com/32/29/51439/49293108.png[/img] I couldnt resist quoting this excellent movie... And welcome in round 2 PC... Have fun on the battlefield and go grab some casualties... we know we both like it ! [/quote] Revenge? Hardly. You attacked friends of PC thinking they were an easy target since you couldn't find any recorded treaties. Thought wrong now didn't you? o/ FAN o/ DT o/ Nordreich Let's have a good old fashioned rumble!