Jump to content

SupremePrince

Members
  • Posts

    254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SupremePrince

  1. TFD and MK already dealt with this situation diplomatically. There is no extort from MK. Thanks for your concern everyone but this matter is over already
  2. Cool. You found a great protector Hanzu Empire
  3. [quote name='raasaa' timestamp='1288283751' post='2495277'] You sir, have no idea how slow TFD can be. They are the perfect competition for GLOF in that department. This treaty should have been titled "Two barrels of molasses" Though this treaty immensely displeases me, i will refrain from any further expression of disdain or contempt for either alliance. [/quote] You shall be stalked and poked that
  4. It was many moons ago now that TFD and The Lodge met each other. Many, many moons. It has been so long, even, that the fact the idea never occurred to us to establish this relationship is beyond me. From chilling out with each other talking about football and the likes to having similar or even identical treaty partners at times, it's curious how nothing has come about. However, as fate would have it, here we are today, announcing the first fruits of our relationship. These Masons really are a class act, and I'm pleased to say we don't regret meeting these fine folk. Without further adieu, I present to you: [i]The Foreign Lodge Declaration[/i]! [center][b][size="5"]The Foreign Lodge Declaration[/size][/b] [img]http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/6039/glofdiplomat.png[/img] [img]http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/4475/tfdflagbj0.png[/img] [/center] [b]Initiation:[/b] The Foreign Division and the Grand Lodge of Freemasons have known each other for a long time. Together, they decided to take today this step in their relationship with the signature of this Peace, Intelligence and Aid Treaty as a ground for a long and developing friendship. [b]Article I: Fraternity[/b] Both signatories will hereafter refrain from any form of hostile activity against the other. Both signatories of this pact pledge to show only respect and good will towards each other. While this will prohibit outright verbal hostility in all its forms, it will not restrict healthy debate or productive disagreement. [b]Article II: Knowledge[/b] Should vital intelligence of a political or military nature come to the attention of one signatory, they are required to share it with the other. Vital is defined as relevant to either signatory's security. [b] Article III: Assistance[/b] If either signatory requests assistance in whatever form, it is strongly encouraged for the other signatory to provide what help it can, though both parties accept that this is not an obligation. [b]Article VI: Cancellation[/b] It is the hope of both signatories that this pact may last forever, or until the bond it represents grows to the point where an upgrade is merited. Given the uncertainties of the future, however, it is recognized that should any of the above Articles be violated, or should some major irreparable disagreement arise, that this pact maybe cancelled after 72 hours notice. [b]Signed for The Foreign Division;[/b] Speaker: Barkeaters Senator: Lusitan Senator: Eivind_the_great Senator: FarmGirl Senator: Basileus MoFA: GearHead dMoFA: SupremePrince [b]Signed for the Grand Lodge of Freemasons;[/b] [IMG]http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/8668/2010octcouncil.png[/img] o/TFD o/GLOF
  5. What wrong with anime? (though I prefer manga) Good luck New Sakura Order!
  6. [quote name='Remaliat' timestamp='1285445672' post='2464503'] Shame my friends at MK can't be friends with my friends at CCC... Really a shame they are lacking that bit of respect. Congratulations to CCC and to NATO, I am quite happy with this new covenant. [/quote] That is sad indeed, Congratulation to CCC and NATO. You guys are awesome.
  7. [quote name='Penkala' timestamp='1284353915' post='2451993'] NSO sent the treaty over with signatures to IRON. IRON wanted nothing to do with NSO until TPF was about to be rolled. IRON saw the option for another ally and took it, and accepted the treaty. This was, iirc, when FB was dissolving. So I'd imagine NSO wasn't about to turn down another tie with the bloc crumbling. In addition, they didn't want to 'take back' an offer that had been made. At least, that's how it was described to me several months ago. [/quote] So basically, they both used each other. Nice.
  8. This was a rather interesting development but it make sense. I really don't think IRON match well with NSO at all.
  9. Why do you care what they do so much? Its their business and their allies business lol.
  10. Looks like you have been through a lot UPN. Good luck and I hope you the best
  11. Interesting pairing. Good luck to both parties.
  12. [quote name='Smacky' date='20 February 2010 - 06:39 AM' timestamp='1266647976' post='2193235'] TFD and NATO got off far too easy for what they did, what a load of horse !@#$. When you all get to calculating reps for TOP and IRON they better be proportional to that, or you can at least have the decency to admit you're only treating them differently because you're all too !@#$% to follow through equally. [/quote] They were just following treaties. If your allies ask you to activate the oA part, you would do the same knowing how PC love aggression.
×
×
  • Create New...