Vol Navy
-
Posts
1,164 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Vol Navy
-
-
[quote name='Stelios' timestamp='1319434888' post='2831442']
Stats?
Good luck and have fun
[/quote]
They have a couple more nations, about 30-40k more NS, about 700 more ANS. We have about 40 more nukes. -
I like this policy. Stick and burn and let the dead wood float away. If being in your alliance is worth less than 200 tech to you, well, good riddance.
-
Hope it's a nice one WAPA. Really like you guys.
-
[quote name='Steve Buscemi' timestamp='1319138771' post='2829392']
Well boys and girls, I think HoT just said we could impose reps like wonder destruction, including SDIs (or they can pay $500m to prevent this) and PZI of Arrnea. Then we'll find some way to impose a viceroy that doesn't violate the will of our great admin. Then we'll roll them again in a years time for having 21% troops when they should've had 20%.
Thanks HoT, you truly are a hero of the ages!
[/quote]
Weren't you in another thread saying things that happened with you 22 months ago basically shouldn't be held against you now? Yet you constantly harp on things that happened 4 or 5 years ago if they involved NPO. -
So the CB is SOS actually did something to Non Grata or simply exists and NG doesn't like them?
-
I actually fought at least 5 of the top 15 at various points. Sometimes two of them at once. The fallout shelter is crushing for casualties. Cost me about 1.5 million so far.
-
Man, your war with RE ended something like 18 days ago. Surely you've recovered since then. Our war with the Spanish ended about 2 days before that. Unfortunately they were terrible.
And no, we don't outsize you. You were the next alliance up from us on the alliance listings. You have more nations, tech, and infra to start the war. We have more nukes. You were the only alliance that wasn't way more than double our size to have more than a handful of nukes.
As for casualties, the two targets I was assigned both were 36 days old, 1999 and 2100 infra, and both had 0 casualties.
So if they don't have money, its not our fault and it's certainly their fault for being at 2000 infra with no nukes and no MP. -
Why on Earth would you want him back if he surrendered after a day of fighting?
-
The only real reason to get in a good blitz and hopefully get an anarchy initially is to keep that nation from declaring ore offensive wars.
When you can nuke 3 extra nations during a cycle you really can tack on major damage to an alliance that you wouldn't be able to if you got anarchied by the blitz. -
I have never been anarchied in conventional warfare in my entire time here. If you stay in Defcon 1, have GC and Barracks and a reasonable number of troops when the war gongs go off you won't get anarchied, even by a quad. Especially so if you are active at update.
In Karma I was hit by two large PC nations and an MK nation immediately after update. No conventional anarchy. Last war I was hit by two huge Mushrooms, one Umbrella and I was fighting two MKers when they hit. No conventional anarchy in 1 vs 5. -
Happy Birthday friends!
-
Good grief.....random billion dollar warchest reports is the best info they could get out of you?
Damn you GoNooS. See what your support of Tetris has caused? -
[quote name='Holy Ruler' timestamp='1317891947' post='2818268']
The sides aren't "even" now. Seems like a curbstomp to me.
If it takes all these alliances to contain Legion, then Legion are not as incompetent as most of the peanut gallery think.
[/quote]
How is it a curbstomp? This is probably the most even war I've witnessed in almost 4.5 years here.
Honestly Legion, you should have just declared your war. Fought your best. Not came out with this kind of stuff whining about it. -
Well if people hit our MDP partner things should get much more fun for me. Hopefully I can get over the 6 million casualties barrier.
-
[quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1317789748' post='2816726']
Righty-o, I guess I'll go for it.
Yes, we had planned to hit NSO. Yes, our target list was left public. Yes, we're stupid for it and we do feel bad.
Also, yes, we are hitting Mogar for posting our target lists. Sure, you didn't do the spying, but you enabled it. We don't play games.
[/quote]
If you are being serious, do you have some mystery treaty with Legion? And why didn't you go through with the hit? What does it matter if it was leaked? -
[quote name='Heft' timestamp='1317783225' post='2816578']
Those are advantages of using more nukes, not simply having more nukes.
Having more is an advantage, but not nearly as significant as it would sound. The biggest advantage is that we might have to spend more money to keep up the pace of full nuclear war with an opponent that 1) has more nukes and 2) doesn't need to launch as many as we do to achieve maximum coverage. But warchests mitigate that advantage. Legion has a lot of numerical/statistical advantages over us and Tetris, the total nuke count disparity isn't even at the top of the list in my mind.
[/quote]
Biggest issues, Legion has a big advantage in the MP/WRC/Tech department. More than 2 to 1 vs NSO/Tetris combined. If the war doesn't spread and someone else doesn't hit Legion, they will have to be supremely incompetent to lose this war.
So I would say that gives NSO/Tetris about a 50/50 chance. -
Really, everyone knows that anyone who wants to attack Polar from the group deriding them can simply do it at any time.
You just did it to NPO and it's allies last war.
There would be essentially no political fallout for doing it vs Polar.
You have the gun, it's loaded, the hammer is back, so don't blame UPN for not pulling the trigger for you too. -
[quote name='Spaarlaamp' timestamp='1317278180' post='2811342']
Finally a real war. I'm glad you followed FEARs example!
[/quote]
What??
They actually declared war and didn't run away. So you mean did exactly opposite of what FEAR did maybe? -
[quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1317277988' post='2811336']
90% of the posters in this thread would gladly reverse their opinion if they were in the opposite situation.
[/quote]
No joke.
Granted, UPN didn't take the smart path but most of the people roasting the guy doing the raiding would normally argue tooth and nail that a notice of protection should be in every bio.
It even seems like it was some kind of term recently. Maybe with the NAAC guys. Maybe before that. Don't recall right now. -
Upsetting holy tribunals is our specialty!
-
[quote name='BloodFury' timestamp='1316556269' post='2804712']
Well I don't like to get involved in things like this since I am not involved, but this needs mentioning. Two Wars have been fought against NPO. Karma, and this most recent one where they got curb stomped. That hardly equates to multiple wars of abuse, and the alliances that were forced off of bob.
[/quote]
The only alliance left who may possibly have any beef with NPO would be FAN imo and even that's sketchy after the multi-month CBless war they just finished against NPO a few months ago. Otherwise they've taken far worse than they ever dished out and chose to stick around through it all and not disband. Step back and realize that NPO has been out of power basically since OoO was dissolved in 2008. Once that happened the Karma dominoes started falling. Since early 2009 they've been politically isolated, and rolled in massive nuclear wars unlike anything ever witnessed. Oh and forced to pay the largest reps in history for a year. There are nations on Bob that are nearly 1000 days old who never witnessed NPO being anything less than a pariah and a punching bag.
I actually give major hats off to TLR and NPO for doing this. The same old same old gets extremely boring and this is a grudge that should be moved past.
To those complaining the most, find some new way to define your reason for being on Bob. If NPO has still dominated your existence after the past 2.5 years of them being beaten and isolated, that's more your issue than anything they've done. -
I find it hilarious that some people still hate NPO this much from CnG. My God you've done far worse to them the past two and a half years than you ever experienced at their hands.
-
My post earlier merely disputed Crymson's post that seemed to imply that TOP was only allied to other PF members.
You are allied to PB, DH, and DR directly while residing in a bloc yourselves. That is 3 of the largest blocs on the planet tied together and the non-bloc bloc DH. Making up a significant chunk of world power.
I felt this was especially ironic considering the original post by Yevgeni claiming that TOP wasn't allied to several blocs. -
[quote name='Crymson' timestamp='1315374743' post='2796189']
You've got us. The Gramlins, OMFG, BN and Argent are definitely the leading hegomonic superpowers.
[/quote]
And The Mushroom Kingdom treaty that ties you to DH. And VE treaty that ties you to PB. And the IRON treaty that ties you to Duckroll. So that's a direct tie to two of the largest blocs, plus the DH non-bloc bloc.
Or were those treaties cancelled and TOP is no longer in a bloc and directly tied to other blocs and defacto blocs?
THP DoW
in TE OWF Archive
Posted
[quote name='St Mungo' timestamp='1319489640' post='2831728']
Aw come on. Can we no find something to argue about?
Or we could have Some WAPA Whiskay. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF0agmxvKgQ&feature=related
[/quote]
We can argue about which of us was able to fire the first nuke off. I suspect you're trying to get us all drunked up so we forget how to find the red button!