Jump to content

nutkase

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,392

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by nutkase

  1. nutkase
    [quote name='Matt Miller' timestamp='1322842749' post='2859407'] Who knew you could see the future? [/quote] /end thread Can't get much better then this!
  2. nutkase
    [quote name='Heft' timestamp='1322777912' post='2858507'] NSO has done more than Gramlins has, since I keep forgetting that you bothered to reform. But yes, I agree that if this is the best that people can come up with then that's pretty sad. And RIA are kind of dumb. [/quote] 1. Hellangel never mentioned our AA, so I don't know where you got that train of thought. 2. NSO has done nothing of late other then get it's head stomped on by what most consider a below par alliance. So if you consider that as "doing more then Grämlins", feel free to do it more often.
  3. nutkase
    SF, please pre-empt PF! I don't care if it takes 1-3 days, along as it happens I will be one happy man
  4. nutkase
    [quote name='Holy Empire of Halin' timestamp='1322404366' post='2853717'] I'd say Ramirus Maximus too [/quote] Get out
  5. nutkase
    Kudos to STA! NpO do not deserve such a good ally!
  6. nutkase
    [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1322301477' post='2852243'] Honestly all I hear is "You betrayed us 3 years ago, You made us pay reps because we lost a war, and now that we have became friends with someone stronger then you were gonna fight you!". It was funnier when TOP was going to declare 3 days ago but then lost support from their new allies and they ran like cowards. The reason there is 66 wars by IRON/TOP is because they're not even fighting, PB/DH is fighting for TOP. If PB/DH dropped support for TOP tomorrow, TOP would call a ceasefire and beg for white peace. TOP will never fight this war, only talk about how they did so well when someone else tries to roll Polar. If TOP was offended so much of getting "betrayed" by Polaris back then, then why didn't they declare 2 years ago and settle the issue? EDIT: Polaris, Please fill out a new debt slip to TOP for 253,000 Tech this time... So they can call it an even 500,000. [/quote] aha . ahahaha . . ahahaahahah . . . AAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAH Liz come save your Deputy Minister from embarrassing CSN any further!
  7. nutkase
    Schattenmann, while I see the theory behind your discussion. The problem is that PF really did not play any major part in this TOP/NpO confrontation. Yes a bloc member has gone to war, yes the rest of us are willing to back them up but really who wouldn't. While TOP's agenda is focused on NpO at the moment, does not automatically becomes PF's. You would actually find that in the end, a lot of people within PF just don't give a damn either way about NpO.
  8. nutkase
    [quote name='Avakael' timestamp='1322285254' post='2851757'] Okay, fair point. Not relying on allies, then? [/quote] It is not always the best idea to rely on others when needed. GGA is a example.
  9. nutkase
    [quote name='Avakael' timestamp='1322284756' post='2851727'] By which you mean, [url=http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_display_alliances.asp?Page=2&Order=DESC&Field=Strength&Alliance=The%20Order%20Of%20The%20Paradox]everyone in TOP below 60k NS is hitting peacemode[/url]. As for IRON...? EDIT: Introduce staggering and you get... 45 wars... I'll be honest, I'm not convinced. [/quote] Actually about half are hitting peace mode, the thought of a counter to any NpO allies that attack them comes to mind?
  10. nutkase
    [quote name='Avakael' timestamp='1322284434' post='2851710'] So far, I count 30 wars between TOP and IRON on Polar. ...I don't know if I'm going to be shot down here or what, but come on, there's 600 of you and fully 117 Polar members not in peace mode. [/quote] NS range is a factor you have not introduced, also staggering.
  11. nutkase
    Your move RIA Go forth brethren and claim your revenge!
  12. nutkase
    [quote name='King Wally' timestamp='1322021264' post='2849521'] NpO > FARK > RoK > NSO clearly they are hiding under the skirt of the sith here... NpO > STA > TPF > NPO Or maybe its evil Pacifica? NpO > FARK > MHA > Umbrella Maybe the unstoppable top teir might of Umbrella? See what i did there? [/quote] Did you read my previous post? I said while I said the connection is there, I wouldn't go as far to say VE will protect them.
  13. nutkase
    [quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1322020376' post='2849511'] I believe he was referring to our ODP with RIA. [/quote] My apologies, in my reference to the connection earlier I was referring through the GOD treaty. NpO > RIA > GOD > VE All being MDP or higher at this current time.
  14. nutkase
    [quote name='Baltus' timestamp='1322019979' post='2849506'] It's an non-chaining ODP. That's like saying that the connection between NG and RoK is strong, and RoK is hiding behind Non Grata. [/quote] It's actually a MDP [quote] In the interests of common security and mutual defense, the signatories agree that the economic and political well-being of one immediately affects the other. As such, an attack of any kind on one is considered a valid casus belli that must be acted upon by the other. [/quote]
  15. nutkase
    [quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1322017343' post='2849477'] What in the world are you smoking? [/quote] While I wouldn't put it that far as to claim they are hiding under "your skirt". The connection is there and it is strong.
  16. nutkase
    [quote name='AlmightyGrub' timestamp='1321940445' post='2848626'] I predict the treaty will expire long before the big talks actually act. It has been years we have been waiting now, luckily I wasn't holding my breath or I would be bluer than their balls much be. [/quote] The tunnel vision here is outstanding!
  17. nutkase
    [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1321940359' post='2848622'] Errr...no. What it says is that they're only bound to defend when the people threatening them actually get the balls to do something. [/quote] It's ok Locke, I accidently read it wrong For some reason, I read it as including mere threats.
  18. nutkase
    Interesting treaty, wonder how long it will last.
  19. nutkase
    [quote name='illusion' timestamp='1320502342' post='2839583'] This question still has not been answered: What happens if NSO stalls or refuses any reasonable peace offers, you still going to roll both alliances (The Legion mainly)? My guess would be yes [/quote] Your guess is correct.
  20. nutkase
    [quote name='Il Impero Romano' timestamp='1320479948' post='2839484'] No, it's not. Do you want it to be or something? I'll admit that I'm at less then full capacity given the hour of the day of the week, but from what I've browsed in the past 20 pages or so you've pushed this point quite a few times. NSO won't get just a light spanking. I promise. Better? [/quote] One question that seems to be keep coming up but never answered (as far as I can see) is What would happen if one party tries everything within their power to peace out, but other side is still unwilling. What is the action going to be?
  21. nutkase
    LM said you can give it to me
  22. nutkase
    [quote name='The Pansy' timestamp='1320377884' post='2838190'] This is me agreeing with Nutkase End of Days people, End of Days. [/quote] You just don't want to end up on the wrong side of a convict
  23. nutkase
    [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1320377553' post='2838184'] I was unaware loyalty and suicidal were two qualities that went hand in hand. You can be loyal and not actively attempt to get your alliance rolled or as one member who knew of his intentions from outside of NPL pointed out, "wanting to stir up trouble." That actually speaks of other qualities, but that is not the purpose of this thread. Actually, in an ironic way it is. Have fun Stukov. I'm sure Xiphosis is enjoying this just as much as you are. [/quote] To be honest, I just saw it as NPL returning a favour. Would of been disappointing to of seen TOP move against it, though I highly doubted they actually would.
  24. nutkase
    [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1320376069' post='2838158'] Yes, because the world wasn't salivating at the proposition of TOP hitting NPL over this for the past few pages. I wonder what TOP will do to this individual now? [/quote] I am hoping my allies see the giant balls this gentleman has in defending what was his alliance, and leave him be.
  25. nutkase
    [quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1320099353' post='2835976'] First off Bob, this is not directed solely at you, you are just the latest to say it. This has been being said all day, The tag line that NSO said repeatedly that they alone could take down Legion. I went back to World Affairs, and read 4 NSO taunt legion threads. [/quote] What I find amusing with what you just said, is the number of threads that NSO made in taunting Legion. You go searching for a particular post about something that really does not matter either way. Yet you don't find the time and energy of NSO making derogatory threads about Legion distasteful. You seem to be projecting your mind solely on what is really of no bearing rather then of the entire problem, yes I know some people are nit picking about issues and small grievances but it is of no real value. Legion feel like they have been wronged by NSO and Tetris and it seems the planet bob is split as to who they believe is in the right, so I say let them smack it out. As they say, After all the victor gets to write the history books.
×
×
  • Create New...