Political side of cyber nations

[Auctor]

Most MDoAP's are oDoAP's with slightly more chest beating.

[Sigrun Vapneir]

It really depends more on the character of those that sign them than the words on paper, and the new trend to avoid the words whether mostly or entirely is just a recognition of that.

 

I dont sign 'M' level treaties - I see them as problematic from a sovereignty point of view. But if I sign a treaty with someone, regardless of how the treaty is classified, it's a relationship I take seriously.

[The Pansy]

I like oDoAP's they are like MDoAP's but with an honest stupidity clause

[Max Power]

 

Eh, the sanction race has barely anything to do with politics. There's a reason its in the OOC forum. 

 

Here's what I think of the web in my mind:

thicker lines mean stronger bond and a circle is a sphere/bloc means most likely they will all roll together

This is incomplete. You're missing all of DS's treaties, TIO's treaties with NATO and R&R, you presume Argent and LoSS will roll with NPO (which obviously happened last war), and I think there's some other stuff too.

 

Oh, and I didn't see tJL or Kashmir either. ;)

[Unknown Smurf]

This is incomplete. You're missing all of DS's treaties, TIO's treaties with NATO and R&R, you presume Argent and LoSS will roll with NPO (which obviously happened last war), and I think there's some other stuff too.

 

Oh, and I didn't see tJL or Kashmir either. ;)

 

It's not exactly a treaty web (at least that was not my intention), it is more of a who rolls with whom web* .. DSs treaties are all redundant with DBDC. Kashmir has no treaties. tJL is a reactionary alliance that will roll with its allies (or Kashmir) no matter what and therefore irrelevant for these purposes. Also with TIO out of US, I don't see 'em rolling with RnR/NATO. Argent rolls with AI who most likely rolls with NPO. 

 

* = Assuming no direct hit on an ally that forces them to go elsewhere. 

Edited November 9, 2014 by Unknown Smurf

[James Spanier]

 

Argent rolls with AI who most likely rolls with NPO. 

 

 

Seems legit. I for one wish it was I who told our other treaty partners of our mass treaty cancellations.

 

 

(Edit: Completely revised upon attaining more conversational context)

Edited November 10, 2014 by James Spanier

[Wobblies]

POOPSICLE IS NUMBA ONE BUT BOOGIEMAN IS COMING UP CLOSE TO BEAT THEM UP. ABOUT LIKE 30 PEOPLE RULE THE WORLD(HAIL THE KAISER) WE ARE FASICST. BAI

I love you ;)

[Sardonic]

MDoAPs are fine as long as they are non chaining.  Burning for your ally and burning for your allies' ally are two entirely different things.

[Gh0s7]

If the only way you can get your ally to do something is to force them to via a piece of paper, then you've got some issues. Regardless, we will defend our allies as needed, whether mutual, or optional.