AironthFlamewing Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 Sorry EM... will retract the post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted April 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='graniteknight' timestamp='1303619263' post='2698233'] Sorry EM... will retract the post [/quote] You can't, i've forever immortalized your outburst for generations to come. Just don't do it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PresidentDavid Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 I take that as a "no" thank you EM. It is greatly appreciated you took the time to read it. (As dumb as the post was of course) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzydog Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='graniteknight' timestamp='1303618672' post='2698227'] Deleted for the sake of EM [/quote] Well, granite, I honestly did nothing wrong. There's no need to get so angry over this. I was merely scolding David for ebing a slimy weasle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 I want a spy roll on Sarah to see where she's storing the Empress's unmentionables so that one of my really creepy characters can infiltrate her palace and dance around with said unmentionables on his head for a video to be released on bobtube.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axolotlia Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 Regardless of whether or not they are stretching the rules, when someone destroys something you have built up for a while, and put effort into (and out of the blue mind you) you are going to try and defend your work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 (edited) Requesting rolls for the nukes launched at Monaco. ( [color=#5D5D5D][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][size=2]A Coruna, Gijon, Santander ) [/size][/font][/color] [color=#5D5D5D][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][size=2] [/size][/font][/color] Edited April 24, 2011 by Sir Keshav IV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael McBride Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 Fizzy, missile curve would put all those missile paths over the eastern most part of Quebec. Missiles don't shoot in straight lines. They need to curve due to the Coriolis Effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 Will the presence of my naval task force near United States of Islands enable me to extend my SDI defense to USI? Since I am an involved party in this RP, I wont be able to adjudicate. If my SDI can be extended over USI in lieu of my warships. The task force is composed of a carrier, a destroyer, a cruiser, 2 battleships and 2 attack subs. The destroyer and cruiser has Anti Ballistic Missile capabilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael McBride Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 I don't see why Cent or Cochin can't rule on the missiles that don't pertain to them. Asking EM to do all this work would be a little unfair in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='Pravus Ingruo' timestamp='1303638897' post='2698384'] I don't see why Cent or Cochin can't rule on the missiles that don't pertain to them. Asking EM to do all this work would be a little unfair in my opinion. [/quote] Cochin can in fact rule as navies are not able to be extended over the land of others for sdi cover. In my case however all targets except one are months old allies, some year old. There is an obvious bias there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 (edited) [quote name='king of cochin' timestamp='1303637419' post='2698374'] Will the presence of my naval task force near United States of Islands enable me to extend my SDI defense to USI? Since I am an involved party in this RP, I wont be able to adjudicate. If my SDI can be extended over USI in lieu of my warships. The task force is composed of a carrier, a destroyer, a cruiser, 2 battleships and 2 attack subs. The destroyer and cruiser has Anti Ballistic Missile capabilities. [/quote] IMO you should be allowed. But others have said that the only working IRL ballistic missile shield on warships should not be allowed to be RPed. [quote name='Centurius' timestamp='1303653633' post='2698449'] Cochin can in fact rule as navies are not able to be extended over the land of others for sdi cover. In my case however all targets except one are months old allies, some year old. There is an obvious bias there. [/quote] And EMs cheering on IRC for Timmy's nukes is not an obvious one Edited April 24, 2011 by Triyun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 Fair point, rolls incoming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='Triyun' timestamp='1303606252' post='2698090'] Requesting spy rolls [img]http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/3261/nuclearspyrollrequest.png[/img] SAT INT on the nuclear triad of Maine. If the first one is successful, requesting a roll on SAT INT for naval assets. Also I of course am requesting SDI rolls to defend myself. (The 3 warheads heading at Beijing) [/quote] [IMG]http://i710.photobucket.com/albums/ww110/gokulvarmank/triyun.jpg[/IMG] Assuming 70% odds, 0-30 fail, 31-100 success, two wins for triyun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='Malatose' timestamp='1303607440' post='2698099'] [img]http://img810.imageshack.us/img810/2613/spye.jpg[/img] SAT INT on the nuclear triad of Maine. If the first one is successful, requesting a roll on SAT INT for naval assets. (Same as Triyun) Anndd, I'm requesting a roll to protect Vienna. I extended my SDI to protect that. [/quote] [IMG]http://i710.photobucket.com/albums/ww110/gokulvarmank/malatose.jpg[/IMG] Assuming 70% odds, 0-30 fail, 31-100 win, first one win, second one fail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 Obviously I wont roll on myself, cochin or Em if anyone of you want to please do. For obvious reasons, whenever a nuke is shot down in an earlier roll I am not doing them in the other rolls. [quote name='Pravus Ingruo' timestamp='1303600615' post='2698043'] Requesting SDI rolls for every missile launched. All, by my calculations, would have to pass over some part of Quebec. Given the recent ruling about SDIs over protectorates, I'd like to request a roll for each missile passing over my territory. Thank you. Also, just to make it easier on all involved, rolls in the order they are listed in Timmy's post please, which would be Douglas, Peel, Ramsey, Stornoway, Benbecula (USI), Vienna, Vienna, Vienna, Vienna, Linz, Graz, Salzburg (Austria), Porto, Lisbon (AF), A Coruna, Gijon, Santander (Monaco), Beijing, Beijing, Beijing (UFE). [/quote] [img]http://data.treksimming.com/rolls/sdirollssmh.png[/img] As always: 1-40= SDI failure 41-100= SDI success Douglas= success Peel= success Ramsey= success Stornoway= failure Benbecula= success Vienna= success Vienna= failure Vienna= success Vienna= success Linz= success Graz= failure Salzburg= failure A Coruna= failure Gijon= failure Santander= failure Beijing= failure Beijing= success Beijing= success [quote name='Centurius' timestamp='1303604390' post='2698073'] Requesting sdi rolls on the nukes that headed for the Athenian Federation and Austria, while I did specify Monaco in my post that was just for ic flavor as I can not actually cover that. For the record, the order is: Vienna, Vienna, Vienna, Vienna, Linz, Graz, Salzburg (Austria), Porto, Lisbon (AF), [/quote] [img]http://data.treksimming.com/rolls/sdirollscent.png[/img] As always: 1-40= SDI failure 41-100= SDI success Vienna= success Graz= success Salzburg= success [quote name='Triyun' timestamp='1303606252' post='2698090'] Requesting spy rolls [img]http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/3261/nuclearspyrollrequest.png[/img] SAT INT on the nuclear triad of Maine. If the first one is successful, requesting a roll on SAT INT for naval assets. Also I of course am requesting SDI rolls to defend myself. (The 3 warheads heading at Beijing) [/quote] [img]http://data.treksimming.com/rolls/sdirollstri.png[/img] As always: 1-40= SDI failure 41-100= SDI success Beijing= failure [quote name='Malatose' timestamp='1303607440' post='2698099'] [img]http://img810.imageshack.us/img810/2613/spye.jpg[/img] SAT INT on the nuclear triad of Maine. If the first one is successful, requesting a roll on SAT INT for naval assets. (Same as Triyun) Anndd, I'm requesting a roll to protect Vienna. I extended my SDI to protect that. [/quote] Considering all nukes got shot down in earlier rolls I will not do the sdi rolls here. [quote name='Sir Keshav IV' timestamp='1303629923' post='2698337'] Requesting rolls for the nukes launched at Monaco. ( [color=#5D5D5D][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][size=2]A Coruna, Gijon, Santander ) [/size][/font][/color] [color=#5D5D5D][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][size=2] [/size][/font][/color] [/quote] [img]http://data.treksimming.com/rolls/sdirollskesh.png[/img] As always: 1-40= SDI failure 41-100= SDI success A coruna= success Gijon= failure Santander= failure A list of all rolls Douglas= success Peel= success Ramsey= success Stornoway= failure Benbecula= success Vienna= success Vienna= success Vienna= success Vienna= success Linz= success Graz= success Salzburg= success A Coruna= success Gijon= failure Santander= failure Beijing= failure Beijing= success Beijing= success Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [IMG]http://i710.photobucket.com/albums/ww110/gokulvarmank/spytim.jpg[/IMG] I need two rolls on Timmy. Roll 1 : To determine the location of his submarine forces using my Anti submarine Warfare teams and satellite intelligence. (which I would RP) Roll 2 : To hack into his military communications network. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='king of cochin' timestamp='1303657863' post='2698480'] [IMG]http://i710.photobucket.com/albums/ww110/gokulvarmank/spytim.jpg[/IMG] I need two rolls on Timmy. Roll 1 : To determine the location of his submarine forces using my Anti submarine Warfare teams and satellite intelligence. (which I would RP) Roll 2 : To hack into his military communications network. [/quote] [img]http://data.treksimming.com/rolls/rollscochin.png[/img] 1-30= failure 31-100= success You got two winners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [IMG]http://i710.photobucket.com/albums/ww110/gokulvarmank/sdipicent.jpg[/IMG] 1-40= SDI failure 41-100= SDI success Rolling on two SDI rolls by Pravus Ingruo and Centurius, 2 successes and 2 failures Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted April 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 (edited) Cheering? I am merely a fierce proponent that nukes build character. As for the rolls, if there are any left overs, i am capable of performing them if need be. EDIT: On the cheering for Timmy's nukes. I expressed my extreme distaste for a certain measure proposed before me, and exhibited an unwillingness to support a knee jerk measure that is blatantly hypocritical when taking into account past scenarios that are identical to this one. Never did I say I supported or condoned Timmy's actions - I merely wished to have someone tell me why this nuking spree is different from previous ones. I stand by my point that perhaps the right people were nuked this time around to get this reaction. That is all. Edited April 24, 2011 by Executive Minister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 I apologize for the formating, my logging isn't opening the entire transcript in colloquy so this is the transcript with coding from a word processory. First thing you said when you came on: Executiveminister</sender> <message id="WKQ79JOGIA3" received="2011-04-23 22:21:55 -0400">TIMMY IS A BOSS</message> That was without anyone saying anything about invalidating his nukes or penalizing re-rolls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='Executive Minister' timestamp='1303666499' post='2698560'] Cheering? I am merely a fierce proponent that nukes build character. As for the rolls, if there are any left overs, i am capable of performing them if need be. EDIT: On the cheering for Timmy's nukes. I expressed my extreme distaste for a certain measure proposed before me, and exhibited an unwillingness to support a knee jerk measure that is blatantly hypocritical when taking into account past scenarios that are identical to this one. Never did I say I supported or condoned Timmy's actions - I merely wished to have someone tell me why this nuking spree is different from previous ones. I stand by my point that perhaps the right people were nuked this time around to get this reaction. That is all. [/quote] Because Michi is hurt his friend got nuked, simple as that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted April 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Triyun' timestamp='1303667975' post='2698571'] I apologize for the formating, my logging isn't opening the entire transcript in colloquy so this is the transcript with coding from a word processory. First thing you said when you came on: Executiveminister</sender> <message id="WKQ79JOGIA3" received="2011-04-23 22:21:55 -0400">TIMMY IS A BOSS</message> That was without anyone saying anything about invalidating his nukes or penalizing re-rolls. [/quote] I'm sure even [i]you[/i] can see the jest in that post. But fine, you caught me. By the powers vested in me as a GM, i hereby transfer my powers over to you. All hail our newest overlord, the [i]Super GM[/i] Triyun! You know, since that's what I purported myself to be during our conversation in #CNRP, right? [sub]Incase anyone is obtuse enough to take that literally - that is also in jest.[/sub] [quote name='Sir Keshav IV' timestamp='1303667978' post='2698572'] Because Michi is hurt his friend got nuked, simple as that [/quote] Exactly. Edited April 24, 2011 by Executive Minister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='Executive Minister' timestamp='1303666499' post='2698560'] Cheering? I am merely a fierce proponent that nukes build character. As for the rolls, if there are any left overs, i am capable of performing them if need be. EDIT: On the cheering for Timmy's nukes. I expressed my extreme distaste for a certain measure proposed before me, and exhibited an unwillingness to support a knee jerk measure that is blatantly hypocritical when taking into account past scenarios that are identical to this one. Never did I say I supported or condoned Timmy's actions - I merely wished to have someone tell me why this nuking spree is different from previous ones. I stand by my point that perhaps the right people were nuked this time around to get this reaction. That is all. [/quote] Or there actually were people in power this time around who remembered past rulings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian the Mighty Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 All hail Mighty GM Triyun! Now we have a reason to blame him for everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.