Thorgrum Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Why dont you just let it die? If you want attention, you've got it, but I see no point in this thread really, apart from few conversations taken out of context, and trying to twist it. My intial thoughts were almost identical to this, logical and straight to the point but if you read the post to the end you do see an admission by the poster that they like the attention. Its pretty clear that once you see that very honest assessment its clear what the purpose of all this is. We should embrace this and allow them to really go at one another, as long as its civil and dosent break any forum rules why let it die? This really could lead to a nice epic 30 pager where the breadth of no u posts could be so sweeping that we look back on it as a bench mark for future foolishness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teriethien Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Hi emily. I remember when this started, I didn't think that this thing with you and MHA would still be going on. I hope you can get it resolved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ch33kY Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 and others don't. Don't you my feelings without even knowing me. You have absolutely know idea how much these 3 months of hate have upset me. Then why repeatedly put yourself through this? Has it become an addiction? I was in the MHA at the time this became an issue and while I cannot speak for everyone, the general vibe was that they were all over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emily Posted September 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Then why repeatedly put yourself through this? Has it become an addiction? I was in the MHA at the time this became an issue and while I cannot speak for everyone, the general vibe was that they were all over it. That's what I thought, then a month later, out of the blue jerdge perused me to my new alliance with a massive long list of threats.... it really only kicks of when they do something like that. But if I reply, they play the "emily is harassing us" card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tristram Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 (edited) OSA Government Statement: The Open Source Alliance does not and will not have anything to do with this issue. While we acknowledge that there are clearly tensions between Emily and MHA. We also support the continued freedom of speech that both parties have enjoyed. Hopefully, MHA and Emily can actually take the time to sit down and talk to finally put these issues behind them so we can continue on. Clearly Emily is hurt, and clearly MHA is hurt over the issue, and we would like to see both parties either work it out, or start ignoring each other. thank you and goodluck, Nolissar will be available for signatures later. Edited September 14, 2009 by tristram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 (edited) So basically the first part just makes it look like you're annoying as hell and got on people's nerves cause you don't go away. Then I got to this gem: [22:10] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> and i tried to do the least damage as i could[22:10] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> i tried 01[22:10] <emily[OSA]> would you turn the gas taps on jews with that excuse??? Seriously, shut up already. People in an online game don't want to talk to you. OH NO, WOE IS YOU, STOP THE PRESSES, THE MENTAL ANGUISH IS UNBEARABLE. edit: and you don't know how to get in touch with a mod? either you're lying or I hope you never breed. Edited September 14, 2009 by hizzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 That's what I thought, then a month later, out of the blue jerdge perused me to my new alliance with a massive long list of threats....it really only kicks of when they do something like that. But if I reply, they play the "emily is harassing us" card I think people would believe MHA over someone who said themselves that they "like the attention". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrancoismofRussia Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Might I recommend a new alliance for you then? I've heard NSO are nice people who give reasons for everything. /serious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacky Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 That was quite painful to read, really. I don't know who you thought you would make look bad by making that post. If it was anyone other than yourself it horribly backfired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emily Posted September 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 That was quite painful to read, really. I don't know who you thought you would make look bad by making that post. If it was anyone other than yourself it horribly backfired. I'm beyond caring! but go on, goad me into dumping more !@#$, thats how these threads usually go isn't it..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrancoismofRussia Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 (edited) I'm beyond caring!but go on, goad me into dumping more !@#$, thats how these threads usually go isn't it..? A general rule of the OWF that I have seen is that you want to pick your fights and only strike (read: post) when you are SURE you can win. That would be a generally better idea for the future. MHA gov will decry anything you say in much more force and numbers than you can, this means you should quietly get more people on your side. That's not even taking into account the others who will help defend MHA's actions. Hint: look for some of MHA's enemies and ask them for support EDIT: The answer is yes, sadly Edited September 14, 2009 by FrancoismofRussia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emily Posted September 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 A general rule of the OWF that I have seen is that you want to pick your fights and only strike (read: post) when you are SURE you can win. That would be a generally better idea for the future. MHA gov will decry anything you say in much more force and numbers than you can, this means you should quietly get more people on your side.That's not even taking into account the others who will help defend MHA's actions. Hint: look for some of MHA's enemies and ask them for support No this should not be a slagging match it's about the truth and their bullying I can stand alone, because I am right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balder Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Lol... fun stuff. I worked very closely with WCR for a number of years and I could never see him that angry unless you deserve the hell out of it. o/ MHA o/ WCR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Emily, from the very beginning of this incident, way back when I've wanted to be on your side. Why do you repeatadly make this so hard? [22:05] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> how about now can u talk like this?01[22:05] <emily[OSA]> problem? [22:06] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> well i didnt know what was going on i didnt feel right attacking you [22:06] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> i left MoDF soon after [22:06] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> became a Diplomat for WAPA 01[22:07] <emily[OSA]> and I give a flying $%&@ because? [22:07] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> well i dont expect you too....but i just wanted to say sorry 01[22:07] <emily[OSA]> for what? [22:08] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> and well ill be in cnwapa alot so u may be seeing me and vice versa 01[22:08] <emily[OSA]> oh 01[22:08] <emily[OSA]> I'll see you out mate! [22:09] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> ok well see you around then 01[22:09] <emily[OSA]> gp back to acting your age - what is it... 3? [22:09] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> well im 22 [22:09] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> and i dont understand what went on 01[22:09] <emily[OSA]> and I'm still VERY pissed off! [22:09] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> i was just doing what i was told to do 01[22:10] <emily[OSA]> you could have !@#$@#$ asked 01[22:10] <emily[OSA]> no !@#$@#$ excuse [22:10] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> and i tried to do the least damage as i could [22:10] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> i tried 01[22:10] <emily[OSA]> would you turn the gas taps on jews with that excuse??? [22:10] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> noone told me anything 01[22:10] <emily[OSA]> <emily[OSA]> would you turn the gas taps on jews with that excuse??? 01[22:10] <emily[OSA]> 22 is old enough to know right from wrong [22:10] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> i would never hurt anyone 01[22:11] <emily[OSA]> oh right 01[22:11] <emily[OSA]> so what would you call what you did? [22:12] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> u may not know what happened in the background i tried to stop them 01[22:12] <emily[OSA]> bollocks! [22:12] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> the only thing i could think of was to take the slot so someone else didn't 01[22:12] <emily[OSA]> you !@#$@#$ volunteered! [22:13] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> i still don't know what happened [22:13] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> its all hush hush 01[22:13] <emily[OSA]> hush hush [22:13] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> but i think WCR wronged you 01[22:13] <emily[OSA]> there's a !@#$@#$ 21 page thread!!!! 01[22:13] <emily[OSA]> don't you !@#$@#$ worry 01[22:13] <emily[OSA]> he'll get his [22:14] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> i cant justify what i did but i can say im sorry 01[22:14] <emily[OSA]> no 01[22:15] <emily[OSA]> call him out [22:15] <FarmerJohn[MHA]> it may not change a thing for you but i wanted you to know that I'm sorry, but that's just...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrancoismofRussia Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 I can stand alone, because I am right I was not saying you were not able to stand alone -- only that you were philosophically outnumbered by people against your point of view. Most people who try to be against you actually have no clue -- which is why they say this was a bad idea. And generally others follow them because they are influential. No one ever reads the original post....ever That makes what you are trying to do that much harder. They only read what you reply. Personally, I find myself in agreement with your side -- Alliance Government should not be allowed to "bully" anyone. My only problem would come if you extended that to telling you to build warchests, sign into roll calls etc. which it seems you aren't saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emily Posted September 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Emily, from the very beginning of this incident, way back when I've wanted to be on your side. Why do you repeatadly make this so hard? I'm sorry, but that's just...... because you want me to feel about this like you do, and I just don't, nothing can change that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin McDonald Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 The most offensive part of this entire post is where you compare your pathetic issues to someone in a gas chamber. That comparison is NEVER valid. Also, echoing what Hizzy said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balder Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 The most offensive part of this entire post is where you compare your pathetic issues to someone in a gas chamber. That comparison is NEVER valid.Also, echoing what Hizzy said. Oh, I missed that. Wow. Yeah, you've pretty destroyed any ounce of sympathy I didn't have, but may have been inclined at some point in the future to obtain. Internet Video Game Disagreement =/= Holocaust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 becauseyou want me to feel about this like you do, and I just don't, nothing can change that. My point is that it doesn't even look like you're trying to resolve this or want to resolve it. We all know what an absolutely wonderful job your last topic did to that end, what better job do you think another thread would do? I love a good drama-llama, but that's just my reflex. Drama-llamas tend to end badly, not happily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emily Posted September 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Oh, I missed that. Wow. Yeah, you've pretty destroyed any ounce of sympathy I didn't have, but may have been inclined at some point in the future to obtain.Internet Video Game Disagreement =/= Holocaust. well it's the standard test of a soldiers liability for his actions. And the standard response to why "I was just following orders" is not a valid excuse. But guess in your rush to hate on me you, as with MHA, will elect to interpret anything I say as malicious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derwood1 Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 It seems to me that all parties should just stop talking to each other, walk away to your own corners and talk to someone else.....there are plenty more folks out here to interact with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balder Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 well it's the standard test of a soldiers liability for his actions. And the standard response to why "I was just following orders" is not a valid excuse.But guess in your rush to hate on me you, as with MHA, will elect to interpret anything I say as malicious. In your rush to judge me, you failed. See, I can play this game too . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emily Posted September 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 In your rush to judge me, you failed. See, I can play this game too . congrats - welcome to the bully club, hope you enjoy your stay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 well it's the standard test of a soldiers liability for his actions. And the standard response to why "I was just following orders" is not a valid excuse.But guess in your rush to hate on me you, as with MHA, will elect to interpret anything I say as malicious. No, not malicious. Just idiotic. Hard to take it seriously when it's idiotic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emily Posted September 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 No, not malicious. Just idiotic. Hard to take it seriously when it's idiotic. as idiotic as you staying in a thread you already dismissed as pointless? Do you like the sound of your own voice or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts