Jump to content

FrancoismofRussia

Banned
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FrancoismofRussia

  1. In seeing such a debate between a former gov member and current members I noticed one thing -- They (Speaking in third person as I was not there personally) still burned their infra for their friends (I assume, Nemesis and IAA?) down to fractions of what they had.... So forgive me if I do not understand your comment. From what I have studied and such, they would have burned on either side? I cannot offer an answer to your other points, as I don't want to try and make stuff up (Im sure you folks could smell BS from a mile away) and cast myself in a rather ignorant light. I only state what I have observed in trying to figure out the politics of this rather convoluted world we are situated in. ADDENDUM: Wasn't the treaty cancellation a full month or two before the actual start of the war? How can anyone really forecast that far in advance?
  2. From the offices of FrancoismofRussia broadcast on broadband across the planet--I come with more riveting discussion-worthy questions for the world at large. Back to an assessment of certain alliances, What is your opinion of the New Sith Order, Why do both sides (In favor of and In opposition to) seem to always spout the same rhetoric at each other until they are blue in the face, and does either side eventually get *new* rhetoric? I pose the same questions as above for the League of Small Superpowers I pose the same questions again for BelAir With all regards, intents, and purposes to further the exploitation of knowledge and antediluvians I seek these answers as well as the Ultimate Question to the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything. FrancoismofRussia, Not panicking since Summer '09
  3. What about the recent apologies to RAD? What sparked those then? And why do they claim to be serious when, as you say, individual apologies are worthless?
  4. Its a bit early, I know, but here is yet another riveting question for all of you veterans because I have noticed some things in different apology threads that were to make one scratch his head. What is the big hubbub about apologies and why do they seem to be met with animosity and thanks from different parties? [ooc]MODS: If you wish me to space these out more then please let me know, I don't want to be rule breaking here[/ooc]
  5. I was not saying you were not able to stand alone -- only that you were philosophically outnumbered by people against your point of view. Most people who try to be against you actually have no clue -- which is why they say this was a bad idea. And generally others follow them because they are influential. No one ever reads the original post....ever That makes what you are trying to do that much harder. They only read what you reply. Personally, I find myself in agreement with your side -- Alliance Government should not be allowed to "bully" anyone. My only problem would come if you extended that to telling you to build warchests, sign into roll calls etc. which it seems you aren't saying.
  6. A general rule of the OWF that I have seen is that you want to pick your fights and only strike (read: post) when you are SURE you can win. That would be a generally better idea for the future. MHA gov will decry anything you say in much more force and numbers than you can, this means you should quietly get more people on your side. That's not even taking into account the others who will help defend MHA's actions. Hint: look for some of MHA's enemies and ask them for support EDIT: The answer is yes, sadly
  7. Might I recommend a new alliance for you then? I've heard NSO are nice people who give reasons for everything. /serious
  8. It is. But its biased toward the rich instead of MHA gov in this case
  9. I announce that I do not know about the Pink-Brown debates. Is there any substance to them besides making all of us in Planet Bob laugh and brightening our day with laughter? About the Description: A friend told me that someone in #belair said that putting this in the description would be funny. Kind of like making my handle in the IRC forums "Francoism[GPA]"? Or just my name in general?
  10. This is a very informative breakdown of different types of alliances. Useful for any who would seek this kind of information, I am sure.
  11. From what I've read on forums, this seems like an excellent move for my comrades. I don't know Browncoats at all and I only know some of LoSS but Im sure this is a good thing. May these two alliances forever prosper under the banner of friendship.
  12. I don't believe I have hailed this announcement yet? I look forward to more of the same Strength and Honor until the ruler of all planet bob sets fire to our atmosphere and destroys us all.
  13. So people make others see them as relevant? Is relevance directly proportional to reputation? As in, an alliance that is known (for Good or Bad) is considered more relevant than another?
  14. Ahh the wait, I believe the phrase is More on News at Eleven Or something to that effect. We will hear of it eventually if it is relevant....Unless of course the OP is simply making a veiled threat with no substantiation
  15. Welcome to the Neutral Corner. This week's question is: What determines the relevance of an alliance? Is it all in the opinions of the alliance you ask?
  16. I think that this is a warning directed at one particular person who will know what youwish is talking about. They may not consider it important enough to reveal details on this forum
  17. Would anyone really take an interest in these kind of threads?
  18. Interesting points of view....Thanks all for a successful first "Franco's Neutral Corner" Also, I meant neutral by *I* am neutral and do not really know either side for or against.
  19. Welcome to my neutral corner. We will be exploring the ups and downs of different alliances (Mostly for my benefit so that I may get a clear picture of how politics in this game works). I pose this question to you all of the community: What do you think of the Poison Clan?
  20. Why do people always seem to use the same arguments after they have been proven false by the alliance/person they're arguing against? This is a rather illogical system and is rather confounding It makes me go all
  21. I haven't a clue who you guys are talking about but from the logs he seems rather.....dull? I salute VE giving all non-RYANGDI nations a chance to get out of what they didn't expect
×
×
  • Create New...