This Charming Man Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Someone who is more charming then you. Look out! I'm not even going to touch upon the choice of people's names here... o/ RAD o/ IS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason8 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 RAD, you know I like you guys for the most part but common! You guys are WAY out numbered and you will get rolled by this if it escalates even more. Unless IS recognizes that they declared war on CG, even if it was an accident, this war will be getting larger and more people will side with CG. And this time NPO will not be there to help you guys PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE GET OUT OF THIS MESS, RAD! If you don't pull out of this, I will be hoping that NSO sides with CG and roll you guys to the max. sorry but that is how I will feel. Read the announcement. Nowhere does it say that RAD supports the actions of IS against CG. Nowhere does it say that RAD is against the actions of IS against CG. What it says is that if an outside alliance decides to attack IS, RAD will respond per the defense clause of PWN. Since IS's actions have been quite unpopular around Planet Bob, we figured it needed to be said that RAD had our allies backs in case things start heating up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Charming Man Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Someone who's more important then you. Surely you jest, Sir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan III Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 I stated in the OP that we realize what we are getting into. We'll stand by our friends regardless. *looks for Ivan Moldavi's new DoW on RAD* And so, Hakai, you stand by people who have less morals then NSO? You stand by people who went against their charter (I think) and turned this into a war? Message to CG: Hit the dumb leaders of IS first and hard then go for RAD please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Read the announcement. Nowhere does it say that RAD supports the actions of IS against CG. Nowhere does it say that RAD is against the actions of IS against CG.What it says is that if an outside alliance decides to attack IS, RAD will respond per the defense clause of PWN. Since IS's actions have been quite unpopular around Planet Bob, we figured it needed to be said that RAD had our allies backs in case things start heating up. Your prepared to fight for something you dont even support? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Charming Man Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 *looks for Ivan Moldavi's new DoW on RAD*And so, Hakai, you stand by people who have less morals then NSO? You stand by people who went against their charter (I think) and turned this into a war? Message to CG: Hit the dumb leaders of IS first and hard then go for RAD please. We, like the people declaring support for CG, stand by our friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Who are you? She is someone who commands a lot more respect, diplomatic and military power than you could ever hope to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 But who are you? Surely you can't be more important than This Charming Man. Ok, well first I am, and second that's hilarious. You can't think of a good comeback so you decide to insult my grammar. Wow. Nice job! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 *looks for Ivan Moldavi's new DoW on RAD*And so, Hakai, you stand by people who have less morals then NSO? You stand by people who went against their charter (I think) and turned this into a war? Message to CG: Hit the dumb leaders of IS first and hard then go for RAD please. Our friends. As in like, people we know well and love (and are allied to via treaty). Is this an unfamiliar concept to you? Thanks for the kind words, though. I don't recall ever saying anything this hateful toward you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druss the Legend Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Ivan III. Why must you be hating in this very RAD thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason8 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Your prepared to fight for something you dont even support? We're prepared to fight for our allies, who we support 100%. Otherwise we wouldn't have signed the treaty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Read the announcement. Nowhere does it say that RAD supports the actions of IS against CG. Nowhere does it say that RAD is against the actions of IS against CG.What it says is that if an outside alliance decides to attack IS, RAD will respond per the defense clause of PWN. Since IS's actions have been quite unpopular around Planet Bob, we figured it needed to be said that RAD had our allies backs in case things start heating up. Soooo, you're going to not-support IS with military support? Or did you mean that you're going to aggressively attack alliances that enter CG's defensive war based on a defense treaty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druss the Legend Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 We're prepared to fight for our allies, who we support 100%. Otherwise we wouldn't have signed the treaty. What this Wonderful Man said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Surely you jest, Sir. I do not jest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 We even get "lolRAD" responses when we do things that everyone supposedly wants everybody else to do. Fickle people make me feel so cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan III Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Read the announcement. Nowhere does it say that RAD supports the actions of IS against CG. Nowhere does it say that RAD is against the actions of IS against CG.What it says is that if an outside alliance decides to attack IS, RAD will respond per the defense clause of PWN. Since IS's actions have been quite unpopular around Planet Bob, we figured it needed to be said that RAD had our allies backs in case things start heating up. Thing ARE going to heat up though. So you guys have made a near-future DoW by doing this. Why stand by some alliance that doesn't have less morals then NSO I have no idea. I wouldn't be caught dead backing up an alliance doing this. I would have suspended the treay. You guys had three ways to go and you took the wrong turn on this and by doing that I am upset by it. You WILL be in my story Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternalis Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Soooo, you're going to not-support IS with military support? Or did you mean that you're going to aggressively attack alliances that enter CG's defensive war based on a defense treaty? Any alliance that enters this war does so on an aggressive front as no one has treaties with CG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Nowhere does it say that RAD supports the actions of IS against CG. Nowhere does it say that RAD is against the actions of IS against CG We're prepared to fight for our allies, who we support 100%. Otherwise we wouldn't have signed the treaty. Does this mean you support them now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crushtania Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Lets hope RAD and IS are indeed working toward that diplomatic solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druss the Legend Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Thing ARE going to heat up though. So you guys have made a near-future DoW by doing this. Why stand by some alliance that doesn't have less morals then NSO I have no idea. I wouldn't be caught dead backing up an alliance doing this. I would have suspended the treay.You guys had three ways to go and you took the wrong turn on this and by doing that I am upset by it. You WILL be in my story Keep on thinking that, I however am going to sit back with my awesome allies in IS, and eat some popcorn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 I wouldn't be caught dead backing up an alliance doing this. I would have suspended the treay. I'll keep that in mind, should you be in any alliance government asking to treaty my alliance. Thanks for letting me know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Any alliance that enters this war does so on an aggressive front as no one has treaties with CG. And Karma was aggressively attacking NPO not defending Ordo Verde. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ModusOperandi Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 We even get "lolRAD" responses when we do things that everyone supposedly wants everybody else to do. Fickle people make me feel so cool. Keep playing the victim, really; keep playing the bully who thinks he's a victim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason8 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Soooo, you're going to not-support IS with military support? Or did you mean that you're going to aggressively attack alliances that enter CG's defensive war based on a defense treaty? If IS gets attacked, we are defending them. It's that simple. Thing ARE going to heat up though. So you guys have made a near-future DoW by doing this. Why stand by some alliance that doesn't have less morals then NSO I have no idea. I wouldn't be caught dead backing up an alliance doing this. I would have suspended the treay.You guys had three ways to go and you took the wrong turn on this and by doing that I am upset by it. You WILL be in my story Why suspend the treaty? It was signed so we had a solid reason for helping out our friends when they needed it. PWN isn't one of those treaties that people back out of when they might possibly become activated. RAD doesn't sign those treaties, unlike some other alliances. An allies' true colors come out when war is on the horizon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 I'll keep that in mind, should you be in any alliance government asking to treaty my alliance. Thanks for letting me know. I'm pretty sure a lot of people have the same thoughts about RAD and IS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.