ChairmanHal Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 THe lone ranger who took down NPO is attacking VE, what ever shall we do? Well, you could always win. RV is nothing if not reliably predictable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Tolkien Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Viridia is doomed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icepick Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 I surrender I will now change my AA to Viridian Entente and fight with those on the pow AA an- o wait nvm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorkingClassRuler Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 This was actually pretty expected, good to see FAIL repaying GDI for their earlier support. Why anyone would have allied with him in the first place is beyond me, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 (edited) Wow, VE taunting Rebel Virginia for going to war in order to repay a debt of honor? You guys sure have balls, taunting RV for only...Well...Honoring his treaties. Which he actually acknowledges is the only reason he's doing it. Poor show, Viridia. Come to think of it, I guess it would come as something of an anomaly to Viridia. I mean, honoring treaties even when it's inconvenient to do so is quite the foreign concept to them, isnt it? Edited August 14, 2009 by Chron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Jimmy Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 It was a good run, Viridian Entente, but it looks like it's time to pack it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted August 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 This was actually pretty expected, good to see FAIL repaying GDI for their earlier support. Why anyone would have allied with him in the first place is beyond me, though. Say what you will about him, there is no denying he looks out for his allies. A treaty with him means something, and I can say that it is more than can be said about most of you (well, when you're really needed at least). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loannes Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 I don't know what to think about this... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Tolkien Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 I don't know what to think about this... VE members ravaged by the warmachine of FAIL, join GGA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loannes Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 VE members ravaged by the warmachine of FAIL, join GGA? I don't think that's it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Tolkien Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 I don't think that's it. Khaaaaaaaan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivellios Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 RV come on man... your better then this... =( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr hairy Ballz Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 orly? well, I see a new tangled web of crazy war coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted August 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 RV come on man... your better then this... =( Now as tempting the idea of leaving one's allies out to dry when the going gets rough might be to many of you, I never was a huge fan of that policy. So long as I am in charge of the League, believe me, we shall never leave our friends behind. And that's final. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 RV come on man... your better then this... =( Hes not doing this for the lulz, for once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bolak Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Sorry to see this Rebel Virginia. Enjoyed fighting beside you, but frankly a wee miffed that you didn't release the bears back then ! Keep staying true to your word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackjackCF Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 RV come on man... your better then this... =( I never thought I'd be defending RV especially when I don't agree with the side he's fighting on, but... Even though what GDI did was stupid, GDI was there to support RV. RV is just returning the favor and doing what an honorable ally does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qaianna Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Gotta love the chain. Viridian Entente honours its peace treaty with the New Pacific Order ... and now this. Who's next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 (edited) RV come on man... your better then this... =( He's honoring his word. There's not really anything you can reproach RV for here, I think. Edit: I see I got beat to saying that several times over. Whoops. >_> Edited August 14, 2009 by Aurion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qaianna Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 True, yeah. I guess one wonders whether it's 'right' (yes, I know I'm using the scare quotes) to ride off to war if you know your ally is..well, wrong. (Assuming that Rebel Virginia sees it that way; if not, that's his opinion and he can have it.) I mean, I remember a lot of speech about walking away from 'allies' when they pull things that are wrong. Both for and against the idea. What's one to do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted August 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 I mean, I remember a lot of speech about walking away from 'allies' when they pull things that are wrong. Both for and against the idea. What's one to do? Just an excuse for cowards to get out of honoring their agreements, making claims that their ally broke the spirit of the treaty by doing something stupid. Well, if you had no plan to honor your treaty regardless, it is a pointless agreement, as is any made with you in the future. Fight the war you promised to commit to, and then work it out with your ally after. If you determine the relationship is beyond repair, cancel then. Not before. Just my philosophy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qaianna Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Just an excuse for cowards to get out of honoring their agreements, making claims that their ally broke the spirit of the treaty by doing something stupid. Well, if you had no plan to honor your treaty regardless, it is a pointless agreement, as is any made with you in the future. Fight the war you promised to commit to, and then work it out with your ally after. If you determine the relationship is beyond repair, cancel then. Not before. Just my philosophy. See what you mean there. Things to keep in mind, should I advance further in the world. Still, one can at least sigh wistfully as they see this sort of thing unfold. Or cackle evilly. That's more dependent on your own personality. I'll lean away from that side, tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 (edited) True, yeah. I guess one wonders whether it's 'right' (yes, I know I'm using the scare quotes) to ride off to war if you know your ally is..well, wrong. (Assuming that Rebel Virginia sees it that way; if not, that's his opinion and he can have it.)I mean, I remember a lot of speech about walking away from 'allies' when they pull things that are wrong. Both for and against the idea. What's one to do? My view is that when you say you'll defend someone, you defend someone regardless. No idea what most think. If it's an ODP, I suppose that would be more valid since you legally can say "No." Edit: Well, not that MDP dodging isn't common. But it holds, I think. Edited August 14, 2009 by Aurion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Pansy Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 I wish the best of luck to my friend RV, FAIL is an example to us all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingzog Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 You have my respect, RV. That won't pay the bills, mind you, but you have it all the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.