Ragashingo Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 It's still hilarious to see that it took almost all of Bob to hit us as hard as we've been hit. And we still didn't just roll over. I'm actually kind of disappointed. You act like that an accomplishment. Plenty of alliances have been hit hard and have held together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Cause yah 5 days in peace mode in nuclear anarchy will allow you to recover. Or not getting much taxes because you have GCs. Yup peace mode is a wonderful thing in order to recover the economy Five days out of war > five days in war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterShadow Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 One of the points of cycling through Peace is to get out of nuclear Anarchy... if you can't manage a non-nuke Anarchy collection during the first five days you are in Peace, I do believe you may wish to speak to Admin because it's clear you have managed to bypass the game mechanics.And if you actually care about your collection amount you can just chuck the GCs if it's that bad. So no. A bit stupid to chuck the GCs no? Yah you are right, get your choice of prize minus -5 happy or nuclear anarchy. How are we to blame if you guys (18 alliances) cant keep us from reaching peace mode, is that our fault? Sitting at 18k NS I had to wait 9 days between defensive wars, so if I went into peace, whos fault is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterShadow Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Five days out of war > five days in war. By that logic. A month out of war > A month in war Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 (edited) Im not hiding Maybe your not...but there are currently 266 of your comrades in Peace mode. If you look at the list of NPO nations, your top 54 nations are in Peace mode. Number 55 is in war mode and from there on, there are a FEW sporadic nations in war mode up till your 96th ranged nation where war mode becomes common. So, yea...you guys continue to hide behind that hippy shield, its done wonders for alliances in the past...... edit: spelling Edited June 14, 2009 by James Wilson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raider Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 By that logic.A month out of war > A month in war Are you saying a month at war is better than a month without war? If so that's pretty bad logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderJerusalem Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 A bit stupid to chuck the GCs no? You need some new guides Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigChris Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 150 Pages in less than 48 hours... o/ Moo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatFALGuy Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 I thought that one "sides" stand was to end crap terms such as these? I am sure I have seen it waved around here more than a few times "NO MOAR E/P/ZI!!!!11111oneshift" "NO MORE HEGEMONY!!!!11111oneshift" "DOWN WIFF DA EBIL TERMS!!!!11111oneshift" Glad to see that it's just business as usual, merely a plight for revenge, though not very surprising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterShadow Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Maybe your not...but there are currently 266 of your comrades in Peace mode. If you look at the list of NPO nations, your top 54 nations are in Peace mode. Number 55 is in war mode and from there on, there are a FEW sporadic nations in war mode up till your 96th ranged nation where war mode becomes common. So, yea...you guys continue to hide behind that hippy shield, its done wonders for alliances in the past......edit: spelling You had our number 1 nation out of peace mode, what happened? Also why are you the only person in IAA, that is in peace mode? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 A bit stupid to chuck the GCs no? Depends on whether or not you want to have -40% on collection. If your collection amount matters to you and/or you don't feel like coming out of Peace anytime soon I wouldn't advise keeping them around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterShadow Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Are you saying a month at war is better than a month without war? If so that's pretty bad logic. How do you get that? It was said that 5 days without war is better than being at war for 5 days. I simply changed the amount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 By that logic.A month out of war > A month in war Wow. You understand basic math. Bravo. Now stop being dumb. My point was that if the NPO does comply with the peace terms it may be able to do a good bit of damage because those 200 or so nations currently in peace mode should have had time to at least stabilize their nations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scythegfx Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Turns out the two more facepalm worth quotes weren't too hard to find. Pg. 139See, as a neutral party, the implication here is that since the NPO is on the sidelines then Invitca will be on the sidelines. It gives the impression (to at least three different people mind you,) that Invitca's sole care in the world of FA is the NPO. and that's where the GGA cracks came from. See, I fail to see how NPO is on the sidelines...considering they are the main target of this war...We however, are on the sidelines for this war... Thats an awful lot to draw from such simple quotes, they're digging pretty hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterShadow Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Wow. You understand basic math. Bravo. Now stop being dumb.My point was that if the NPO does comply with the peace terms it may be able to do a good bit of damage because those 200 or so nations currently in peace mode should have had time to at least stabilize their nations. So which alliance should we hit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilien Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 150 Pages in less than 48 hours...o/ Moo! 150 pages of mockery! o/ indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 You had our number 1 nation out of peace mode, what happened?Also why are you the only person in IAA, that is in peace mode? Why, because someone has taken it upon themselves to spy my nukes away, that's why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 150 pages of mockery! o/ indeed. Hey now, not just everyone can do this. I mean hell, not even GGA got this far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delendum Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 "THIS IS JUST A CRY FOR REVENGE!!! KARMA ARE HYPOCRITES FOR DEMANDING VERY HARSH TERMS!!!" The point of this whole war, and the terms respectively, is to make sure you won't be in a position to dictate the fate of other alliances in the future as you did countless times in the past. It's obvious you were unable to change while you were on top, so change is forced upon you. Call it what you will, this power needs to be taken from you, and it will be. Hypocritical would be you getting off easy, and thus Karma defeating its goal of ending the tyranny by allowing you to bounce right back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterShadow Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Why, because someone has taken it upon themselves to spy my nukes away, that's why. So buy some spies and catch them. And how about my other question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raider Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 I thought that one "sides" stand was to end crap terms such as these? I am sure I have seen it waved around here more than a few times "NO MOAR E/P/ZI!!!!11111oneshift" "NO MORE HEGEMONY!!!!11111oneshift" "DOWN WIFF DA EBIL TERMS!!!!11111oneshift" Glad to see that it's just business as usual, merely a plight for revenge, though not very surprising. Who has Karma E/P/ZIed? Who but the NPO has received harsh terms? No one. That's who. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheListener Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 (edited) You had our number 1 nation out of peace mode, what happened?Also why are you the only person in IAA, that is in peace mode? rogue attacks are a thing of beauty. Edit: this is directed at the second statement. Edited June 14, 2009 by TheListener Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 I thought that one "sides" stand was to end crap terms such as these? I am sure I have seen it waved around here more than a few times "NO MOAR E/P/ZI!!!!11111oneshift" "NO MORE HEGEMONY!!!!11111oneshift" "DOWN WIFF DA EBIL TERMS!!!!11111oneshift" Glad to see that it's just business as usual, merely a plight for revenge, though not very surprising. The terms offered are harsh but fair. Additionally they do not include E/P/ZI. If you think that these terms are business as usual then you are less bright than even your pathetic language skills seem to suggest. I'd advise you to tone down the 1's and make less use of the shift key if you want to be taken even the least bit seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterShadow Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 (edited) Why, because someone has taken it upon themselves to spy my nukes away, that's why. rogue attacks are a thing of beauty. Um which is it? I will assume it is what James says since it is his nation. But let it show that you contradicted each other in a period of 2 min. Yet you expect us to remember everything that anyone has ever said. Edited June 14, 2009 by Mr.AdmiralX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King DrunkWino Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 See, I fail to see how NPO is on the sidelines...considering they are the main target of this war...We however, are on the sidelines for this war...Thats an awful lot to draw from such simple quotes, they're digging pretty hard. Did you know that little red arrow in the white box which appears in the quote bar can take you back to the quoted text? I invite you go use that little arrow to go back to page 139 where the entire issue (of which you are not understanding based on your response,) takes place. The sum up is: Haf: The game is gonna go on pause till the NPO rebuilds and that's gonna stink See: No, there's a lot of drama brewing Haf: Yeah, but the NPO will be on the sidelines for all that while it rebuilds, and so are their allies (implication on Invitca.) See (and others): The heck are you talking about?! Is the NPO the ONLY treaty you care about?!?! Haf: ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts