Masterof9puppets Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) An open challenge he accepts, whom the one making that challenge accepts without any hesitation...Im sorry, but quite frankly, aren't you the one who has no business butting into this private matter? Being one of Will's leaders, I have much more business in this than you. As Myworld stated, anything else can be discussed in private on IRC. Goodnight. Edited May 11, 2009 by masterof9puppets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebastian Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 You have no relation other than team color to Will's raid, and DT doesn't recognize that as MDP-able relation.If NPO decided to come to the targets defense, this would be a different case. Merrie =/= NPO. In that case, I extend my personal protection towards Merrie. And guess what, I do recognize his attack as a MDP-able relation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuiNur Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Well this is all well and good, calling DT out for raiding red. But we are not out of line in our policy, or in NPO"s policy. Every nation Willirca raided has an AA. Case closed. Unless your all just saying raiding is wrong on it's self, then this is all a bit off topic. So I'd recommend making your own topic on the matter of ebil tech raiders. Not to mention, (if a nation was unaligned), I thought they had to request their case in Red's protection court. NPO does not go "help" any unaligned unless they request it. Also, as MoP said, merrie =/= NPO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Being one of Will's leaders, I have much more business in this than you. When did I declare an attack or threaten to jump into the fray? Still doesn't make the private conflict any of your business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 You can take it private, I'm not, when your ready to talk I'll be here, I knew you would run away when the issue became defenseless. Oh, Myworld, no comment about your past stance on techraiding? LMAO, I always knew you where bankrupt of any real character. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebastian Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Well this is all well and good, calling DT out for raiding red. But we are not out of line in our policy, or in NPO"s policy. Every nation Willirca raided has an AA. Case closed. Unless your all just saying raiding is wrong on it's self, then this is all a bit off topic. So I'd recommend making your own topic on the matter of ebil tech raiders. A one man AA is not an alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vhalen Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Being one of Will's leaders, I have much more business in this than you. And much more reason to be embarrassed. I'm thankful I'm not associated with him. Somehow, I think that now this has become a giant uproar, it's going to be solved rather quickly all the sudden, so I'm done with this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyin Hawaiian Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) There's no way the New Pacific Order can enforce the revenge doctrine, and maybe in the surrender terms for NPO (if they surrender) will be removing the revenge doctrine. Besides, NPO has much bigger things to worry about than defending a red nation that IS NOT in NPO. Edited May 11, 2009 by Flyin Hawaiian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poet Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Stop being such !@#$%*es, none of you people have an 'anti-raiding-red' policy and by trying to pretend you have one by throwing a little hissy-fit and threatening DT you're being just as opportunistic as any raider has been. The Moldavi/Revenge doctrines have always been complained about, and while I'll admit the Moldavi doctrine is far worse, I don't support either and I openly promote the raiding of red nations if NPO cannot do anything about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyin Hawaiian Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) double post... me = lag Edited May 11, 2009 by Flyin Hawaiian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaPirate Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 At this point I don't recognize DT as anything more than a bunch of alternative names for donkeys. It's "Jackass", actually.Jack-$@!. Being Politically correct is so overrated. Indeed, more classiness from DT Hypocrisy at its best! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Stop being such !@#$%*es, none of you people have an 'anti-raiding-red' policy and by trying to pretend you have one by throwing a little hissy-fit and threatening DT you're being just as opportunistic as any raider has been.The Moldavi/Revenge doctrines have always been complained about, and while I'll admit the Moldavi doctrine is far worse, I don't support either and I openly promote the raiding of red nations if NPO cannot do anything about it. Oh how I am rooting for NPO, nothing I'd love more than to watch them hunt you all down, now, for an unaligned red nation, that would truly be KARMA! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) Stop being such !@#$%*es, none of you people have an 'anti-raiding-red' policy and by trying to pretend you have one by throwing a little hissy-fit and threatening DT you're being just as opportunistic as any raider has been.The Moldavi/Revenge doctrines have always been complained about, and while I'll admit the Moldavi doctrine is far worse, I don't support either and I openly promote the raiding of red nations if NPO cannot do anything about it. Really? Opportunistic? When the guy literally asks for it? That's rich. Hypocrisy at its best! lol1.gif Well...its common knowledge that sarcasm is wasted over the internet. Edited May 11, 2009 by ReturnOfChron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Stop being such !@#$%*es, none of you people have an 'anti-raiding-red' policy and by trying to pretend you have one by throwing a little hissy-fit and threatening DT you're being just as opportunistic as any raider has been.The Moldavi/Revenge doctrines have always been complained about, and while I'll admit the Moldavi doctrine is far worse, I don't support either and I openly promote the raiding of red nations if NPO cannot do anything about it. The only reason people ever had anything resembling an anti-raiding-red policy, as you put it, was because they feared the NPO, and they feared the backlash they'd receive from everyone else. IF the revenge doctrine is overturned, then there's really no reason to NOT raid red any longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Hypocrisy at its best! Really, thats the best you could come up with? No wonder your leaders retreated from this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supa_Troop3r Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Really, thats the best you could come up with? No wonder your leaders retreated from this thread. Didn't retreat, Just waiting for you to reply to make earlier post. Until then I'll just watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 double post... me = lag Actually I think your boys attacks have everything to do with the OP, don't you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poet Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) Oh how I am rooting for NPO, nothing I'd love more than to watch them hunt you all down, now, for an unaligned red nation, that would truly be KARMA! Cry me a river, it's not going to happen. And I hardly see how raiding red is inherently worse than raiding any other colour, so kindly $%&@ off. Edited May 11, 2009 by Kraden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaPirate Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) -censored- Edited May 11, 2009 by NinjaPirate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Cry me a river, it's not going to happen. And I hardly see how raiding red is inherently worse than raiding any other colour, so kindly $%&@ off. Well, have fun learning to use the forums before posting. When quoting someone, it's usually best to not highlight a large portion of the quoted text and then type something, as that tends to erase the highlighted text. What's more, if you do make that mistake, simply right-click in the writing space, and select "undo", that should take care of that nasty issue in the future. Hope I was able to help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poet Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 No, they left because DT doesnt like to pick fights with midgets. This thread is about exactly that... Don't give me that !@#$%^&*. I just don't have anything against raiding, and when NPO cannot do anything about it, I don't have anything against raiding on red either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 No, they left because DT doesnt like to pick fights with midgets. LMAO, really, tech raiding is the very definition of picking fights with midgets, Ahahahahaha, so rich! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebastian Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) Stop being such !@#$%*es, none of you people have an 'anti-raiding-red' policy and by trying to pretend you have one by throwing a little hissy-fit and threatening DT you're being just as opportunistic as any raider has been.The Moldavi/Revenge doctrines have always been complained about, and while I'll admit the Moldavi doctrine is far worse, I don't support either and I openly promote the raiding of red nations if NPO cannot do anything about it. Who's threatening DT? What's asked is that the aggressor from DT, who had the nerve to come here and brag about his opportunistic attack against unaligned Red nations, pays reps to said nations. That being said, how on Bob is the Revenge doctrine bad? Cry me a river, it's not going to happen. And I hardly see how raiding red is inherently worse than raiding any other colour, so kindly $%&@ off. Attacking Red right now is like attacking a recently disbanded alliance. Opportunistic and dishonorable. Edited May 11, 2009 by Sebastian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poet Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Well, have fun learning to use the forums before posting.When quoting someone, it's usually best to not highlight a large portion of the quoted text and then type something, as that tends to erase the highlighted text. What's more, if you do make that mistake, simply right-click in the writing space, and select "undo", that should take care of that nasty issue in the future. Hope I was able to help. Not really sure what you're talking about but thanks anyway! kisses and hugs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Not really sure what you're talking about but thanks anyway! kisses and hugs Ah! I see you were able to edit out the bastardized quote text from my post, thats good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.