Yankees Empire Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 I don't think you would have gotten grief over going neutral. Probably would've in private channels. "Why won't you join Karma?!" "Fight for your allies in TPF!" etc. etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Probably would've in private channels."Why won't you join Karma?!" "Fight for your allies in TPF!" etc. etc. I would honestly be surprised. For precedence you need only look at TOP during UJW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chet Ubet Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 TOOl what the hell are you doing your just going to leave us like that I hope the trimvirate cancel this treaty and if you have allies on both sides at least you can be neutral and not help one friend out but not the other Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poobah Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Probably would've in private channels."Why won't you join Karma?!" "Fight for your allies in TPF!" etc. etc. You're wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squiggers Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 We couldn't give a damn if we lose the sanction. We weren't that bothered about achieving it, or holding it, in the first place. Quite frankly, I look forward to having a good fight, and if we go down, we'll rise again. We have the allies, the manpower, and honestly, the shear enjoyment. Its rare that we go to war, and if you think we're poor fighters, you best think again. The beast is stirring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taget Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 TOOL is a great alliance. DT ain't shabby either. It's too late to go back now so cyberlawyering either sides CB is a waste of time at this point. So let's all have some fun and agree to let bygones be bygones and drink cyberbeer together when the fighting is done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterof9puppets Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm flattered that you decided that the best use of your 8mil NS was fight our 1.5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the riddler Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Now, I'm just wondering here, but will you come to the defense of IRON? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcos Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 (edited) ahhh conflicting treaties, they are a hassle. hopefully not to much will come to harm. Edited April 25, 2009 by Marcos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Teets Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 o/ TOOL give em hell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Ozujsko Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm flattered that you decided that the best use of your 8mil NS was fight our 1.5. Puppets speaks the Truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Puppets speaks the Truth. Don't worry, we got sparta, AO and the brigade on us, you don't see us whining... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING TOOL? HONORING YOUR TREATIES BECAUSE THE PEOPLE YOU'RE FIGHTING DIDNT EVEN USE TREATIES PROPERLY? WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT? DONT YOU KNOW WE'RE GOING TO LOSE? SAVE YOUR INFRAS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING TOOL? HONORING YOUR TREATIES BECAUSE THE PEOPLE YOU'RE FIGHTING DIDNT EVEN USE TREATIES PROPERLY? WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT? DONT YOU KNOW WE'RE GOING TO LOSE? SAVE YOUR INFRAS! You know it's more honorable to cancel your treaties with the losing side a few days prior to the war and then pretend you were always friends with the side you're currently fighting for, even if a few months earlier you were signing treaties with the other side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 (edited) WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING TOOL? HONORING YOUR TREATIES BECAUSE THE PEOPLE YOU'RE FIGHTING DIDNT EVEN USE TREATIES PROPERLY? WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT? DONT YOU KNOW WE'RE GOING TO LOSE? SAVE YOUR INFRAS! My problem has more to do with the fact that TOOL chose this side when they have allies on the other because from what I've heard graham keatley thought the NPO's CB on OV was legit. They could have easily gone neutral or gone the other way. Not to mention the fact that TPF was heavily involved in orchestrating the war and deserve to get hit as much as possible. Edited April 25, 2009 by Nausea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 My problem has more to do with the fact that TOOL chose this side when they have allies on the other because from what I've heard graham keatley thought the NPO's CB on OV was legit. They could have easily gone neutral or gone the other way. Not to mention the fact that TPF was heavily involved in orchestrating the war and deserve to get hit as much as possible. so hitting alliances not even at war with the people you have treaties with is ok? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoomzoomzoom Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 My problem has more to do with the fact that TOOL chose this side when they have allies on the other because from what I've heard graham keatley thought the NPO's CB on OV was legit. They could have easily gone neutral or gone the other way. Not to mention the fact that TPF was heavily involved in orchestrating the war and deserve to get hit as much as possible. If that were the case then you would have never have activated the MDP you hold with Argent. Did you know they are TOOL's former protectorate and hold a MDoAP? Conflicting treaties, OH MY! They could have easily gone neutral or gone the other way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 If that were the case then you would have never have activated the MDP you hold with Argent. Did you know they are TOOL's former protectorate and hold a MDoAP? Conflicting treaties, OH MY!They could have easily gone neutral or gone the other way. We activated an oA and they really wanted to come in for us. TOOL knew the score on this before the war began. It's moreso what I heard about grahamkeatley rather than his alliance defending TPF that makes me not like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhawk Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 It's moreso what I heard about grahamkeatley rather than his alliance defending TPF that makes me not like this. Now you're rolling in the mud. You're better than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 (edited) Now you're rolling in the mud. You're better than that. I meant his opinion on the OV CB, so it's all subjective. I'm not making any OOC accusations, if that's what you think I was doing. so hitting alliances not even at war with the people you have treaties with is ok? You're talking about ghost DoWs? I think they're pretty useful. Edited April 26, 2009 by Nausea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamkeatley Posted April 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Nausea, you are inaccurate. I suggest you revisit your source of information and inquire further if you wish to persist in trying to smear my name. If your source persists; ask Janax - as of the other night, to my impression we cleared the air of hanging misunderstandings. Have a good evening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the riddler Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 (edited) Nausea, you are inaccurate. I suggest you revisit your source of information and inquire further if you wish to persist in trying to smear my name. If your source persists; ask Janax - as of the other night, to my impression we cleared the air of hanging misunderstandings. Have a good evening. So you don't think they had a valid CB? Edited April 26, 2009 by the riddler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaPirate Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 It comes in turbulent times that this announcement comes. Ya... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Nausea, you are inaccurate. I suggest you revisit your source of information and inquire further if you wish to persist in trying to smear my name. If your source persists; ask Janax - as of the other night, to my impression we cleared the air of hanging misunderstandings. Have a good evening. I did leave the possibility of it not being true there. Consider it taken back if I'm wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamkeatley Posted April 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 I did leave the possibility of it not being true there. Consider it taken back if I'm wrong. No hard feelings at all, I was just stating before this line of argument continues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.