EliteGeneral Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 This DoW shos more balls then all of NPOs enemies combined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The AUT Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Not gonna lie, you guys took those three VE nations I was attacking into a back alley and beat the hell out of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o-dog Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 This DoW shos more balls then all of NPOs enemies combined. Now, there is some fine twisted logic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcdt94 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 This DoW shos more balls then all of NPOs enemies combined. Yeah, because it takes a lot of balls to defend the only alliance who has controlled Cybernations for 3 years. )): Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SovietNoob Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Well? Good luck, I suppose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy2e Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Oh, so they just had a sudden change of heart and decided to honor their treaties? From a third person perspective it looks like absolutely none of NPO's allies have any idea what they are doing. They all decide to drop their treaties and the next day after Echelon supports NPO you guys come in and want to defend NPO as well. This is just a miserable game of follow the leader, and it shows just how terrible all of you have made the political landscape of Cybernations. Lol.. Third Person Perspective, AKA "i get my info off of the BBs and IRC chatter" you made a funny. :lol: You pretend to know so much, yet know so little. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnCapistan Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Yeah, because it takes a lot of balls to defend the only alliance who has controlled Cybernations for 3 years. )): Err What Jimmy said :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcdt94 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Lol.. Third Person Perspective, AKA "i get my info off of the BBs and IRC chatter" you made a funny. :lol: You pretend to know so much, yet know so little. I find it interesting how you completely ignored the topic at hand. You canceled your MADP with NPO. Only after Echelon defends NPO, do you claim to "honor" your treaty which you canceled. Whatever it is you are trying to pull here, you are just making yourselves looks stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Wait so it's "honorable" to defend an ally whom you know is in the wrong? Yes, yes it is. We defend our friends when they get in trouble, whether it was their fault or not. That's what being an ally is all about. Maybe you should have learned to honor your treaties 8 months ago.Karma is coming for you. You might want to note in which alliance the majority of the leadership of MCXA from 8 months ago now resides. Though, Fresh still commands my respect. This is good. He definitely should. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raunchero Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I find it interesting how you completely ignored the topic at hand. You canceled your MADP with NPO. Only after Echelon defends NPO, do you claim to "honor" your treaty which you canceled. Whatever it is you are trying to pull here, you are just making yourselves looks stupid. Yes we canceled our personal treaty with NPO. However, we did not choose to defend NPO only after Echelon decided to. If you are aware of any of the facts, you will know that I took it upon myself after a heated discussion in our government channel (and a lot of help from Gopherbashi) to go back and defend NPO, garner as much support, and let our allies know that we could not leave NPO high and dry. The logs are out there, I've heard people discuss them all over IRC and they were leaked. We may have made a mistake, but we are not stupid. We're here to fight a war and do what is right. o/ MCXA o/ VE It'll be fun, guys! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesca Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) That's very good. When they are done with you nothing but dust will be left. Happy Birthday MCXA Oh don't worry, Sam, your time will come, if it hasn't already. Also, I don't suppose you'd understand the concept of honour > infra. Edited April 24, 2009 by Francesca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcdt94 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Yes, yes it is. So in essence you are fighting for what you know is wrong, but it's "honorable" simply because the side that is wrong is your supposed "ally". Thanks for demonstrating that you are a total puppet. Do you just refuse to fight for what is right because you are not intelligent enough to think for yourself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Schumacher Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Oh don't worry, Sam, your time will come, if it hasn't already. Don't be bitter Fran. And thanks for the Birthday wishes Sam...Where's the caek? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 So in essence you are fighting for what you know is wrong, but it's "honorable" simply because the side that is wrong is your supposed "ally". Fighting for your friend is never wrong. Abandoning your friends when they need you the most is always wrong. Loyalty is a virtue, not a sin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcdt94 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Fighting for your friend is never wrong. Abandoning your friends when they need you the most is always wrong.Loyalty is a virtue, not a sin. If that were true /b/ would still be around. Whether you are too stupid to realize it or not remains to be seen, but wars are fought on the premise of ideals, not treaties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesca Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Don't be bitter Fran. I'm not bitter towards you or MCXA, in fact my relations with my attackers have been quite cordial. They can confirm that if necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy2e Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 If that were true /b/ would still be around. Whether you are too stupid to realize it or not remains to be seen, but wars are fought on the premise of ideals, not treaties. The MCXA High Council never took nor wanted input from the NPO on whether or not we should defend them. The decisions was purely internal. Just so your aware. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcdt94 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) The MCXA High Council never took nor wanted input from the NPO on whether or not we should defend them. The decisions was purely internal. Just so you're aware. So the MCXA supports attacking alliances in the middle of peace talks? I fixed your post by the way. Edited April 24, 2009 by lcdt94 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) Lol.. Third Person Perspective, AKA "i get my info off of the BBs and IRC chatter" you made a funny. :lol: You pretend to know so much, yet know so little. I know. I saw the screens and Fresh rallying you cowards back to the fray. EDIT: It's fray not frey >_> Edited April 24, 2009 by MegaAros Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigerdonia Redux Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I know. I saw the screens and Fresh rallying you cowards back to the fray. Show us? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feuersturm Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) We do not seek forgiveness or absolution from Pacifica; we do not seek leniency or respect from Karma. Our allies will judge us, our foes will judge us, history will judge us. Let them come to whatever conclusions they will. I care not.We ride to war. I, for one, will put it behind me. To come back is better then to never come back at all. So we ride to war together. Let us teach KARMA how real men fight Edited April 24, 2009 by Feuersturm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yung flow Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 gaining up like 7 alliances on NPO boy you guys must be some tough dudes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crawlerbot Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Hail Viridia! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schecterville Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Scream Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Ignoring pacts when you want to and then changing your mind, o/ MCXA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.