Il Terra Di Agea Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 (edited) ooc: Dude, I've been rping an ever expanding web at approximately 120 NM a day since the day I started the web in my fact book from 3 different locations around the world. India, Antarctica, and Tasmania.. when it got too ridiculous to try to track on the global radius indicator I just made it global because they were effectively everywhere. Once again, you're talking out your ***, and if you want I'll re-post the images of tracking the ever-expanding sea-crawler web if that is your wish. You also need to read my fact book, there are multiple sea-crawler rp posts. I don't expect you to know everything about my rp, but don't pretend to know everything about it when you obviously haven't even looked. BTW, the Naps were optional. You're putting words in our mouths in OOC. This is getting tiresome Terra. You do are starting to do this kind of thing in almost every thread I post, akin to Uberstein. I'm not sure what you have against me, but this is getting annoying. I know there are deep and shallow areas.. ever hear of Buoyancy? Alright, here are a few problems. 1: Just no to 120 NM a day, thats a lot of your fancy little launchers, each of which would cost several million dollars USD, empty. (And you just made that number up, I read your little factbook, and that number is no where to be seen) 2: I saw two Sea-crawler posts linked in you factbook. I know that there are more, so stop yelling that everyone needs to read your fact book to check things that aren't there. 3: I've read the factbook, there is much less there than you claim 4: OH yes, pointing missiles at every nation in the world (Honestly an aggressive act in and of it's self) and saying "If your so scared, come sign a treaty!" is in no way persuading them, nay, forcing them to sign it for their own safety 5: I wouldn't post anything in your threads if you stopped metagaming and godmodding. It helps to read the rules of both CNRP and the forums. You can't do half the things you claim, and lately, you've been out of control with the rule breaking of your posts. 6: Notice that it's only been recently that I've been calling you on this, it's because you are pressing the limits of what the rules allow now. Right when you came back, I had no issue with you. I at least once praised you for being one of the few reasonable RPers here. I have no problem with you, it's your RP, and your ego. 7: Yes, buoyancy is the upward force that keeps things afloat. The net upward buoyancy force is equal to the magnitude of the weight of fluid displaced by the body. This force enables the object to float or at least seem lighter. That definition is all you should need. Buoyant things float, they don't like to stay in one place, suspended in the middle of a body of water, they will push to get to the surface. EDIT: Also, assuming you're using a torpedo that can take out a ship with one shot, a single one costs up to 2.9 million dollars, 1/1000 of your GDP. The torpedoes alone would bankrupt you, not to mention the launchers and the missiles. Edited January 31, 2009 by Il Terra Di Agea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vasili Markov Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 (edited) First, you are allowed to kill characters, but not leaders. Second, for them to be a leader, they have to have a nation state to be leader of. But I agree, etiquette left these boards a long while ago, and there have been some horrendous examples. I agree that there are many horrendous examples of poor etiquette. Hence me trying to bring etiquette back.... And I think that we really need a code of conduct for players so they know how to behave. Good manners seems so rare these days. Edited January 31, 2009 by Vasili Markov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Yes, I admit that fact. After all, it all starts with the biggest hunt in history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyFallout Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 First, you are allowed to kill characters, but not leaders. Second, for them to be a leader, they have to have a nation state to be leader of. But I agree, etiquette left these boards a long while ago, and there have been some horrendous examples. Well, in Sumeragi's case, you could argue that she is the leader of the Kyokujitsuan (sp) resistance. Sargun and I will have to discuss this one with the mods and bring back a more formal ruling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 (edited) Well, in Sumeragi's case, you could argue that she is the leader of the Kyokujitsuan (sp) resistance. Sargun and I will have to discuss this one with the mods and bring back a more formal ruling. I personally don't mind that particular RP, so you don't have to rule on it. However, a formal ruling on character killing in general needs to be done for the sake of players. Edited January 31, 2009 by Sumeragi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 (edited) My personal opinion is assasination is an instrument of conflict, this is a political simulator, it should be available if there is a reasonable opportunity to do so. I fail too see how it is discourteous OOC. Its nothing personal. As for IC, who cares about courtesy Edited January 31, 2009 by Triyun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 My personal opinion is assasination is an instrument of conflict, this is a political simulator, it should be available if there is a reasonable opportunity to do so. I fail too see how it is discourteous OOC. Its nothing personal. As for IC, who cares about courtesy I figure you wouldn't mind Triyun II dying then. Noted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Would I like it, no? If he was placed into a realistic position where he could not avoid dying, such is life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Terra Di Agea Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 I think that any assassination plots should be cleared by the assassinating party and the assassinated party before it's RPed. It does make for good RP, but it's incredibly disrespectful, ruins a lot more rp than it makes, and will generally lead to a cluster !@#$ of OOC ranting and whining by everyone. But, if a leader was, say, inspecting their army on a battlefield, and the entire thing gets nuked, it would be reasonably if they died, unless the person RPs a good reason why they could live Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Seb Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 I think that any assassination plots should be cleared by the assassinating party and the assassinated party before it's RPed. It does make for good RP, but it's incredibly disrespectful, ruins a lot more rp than it makes, and will generally lead to a cluster !@#$ of OOC ranting and whining by everyone.But, if a leader was, say, inspecting their army on a battlefield, and the entire thing gets nuked, it would be reasonably if they died, unless the person RPs a good reason why they could live I agree 100%. Unless the person is time and time again RPing their leader out of impossible situations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 What if the two parties are the same, as in my killing of N. Reeki? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Terra Di Agea Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 What if the two parties are the same, as in my killing of N. Reeki? Well, if you want to kill your own people, go ahead :jihad: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 If you haven't noticed, I already am. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tahsir Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 So yeah, I think my question back in the Sea Crawler thread shot a big whole in the Dragonisia missle issue.. Area is Squared, not linear... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Very Simply Put Can I RP a Chinese Nation in India Some say I can't. But shouldn't I be able to control my demographics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Now all I said was, The people existing in the said region can not vanish into thin air and turn into Chineese at the drop of a hat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 if Justinian said that he has said that they are ethincally Indian, I'll add a minority. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 So yea, A majority of Indians become a Minority within few seconds? That doesn't seem to be a fair Role Play at all >_> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 well i do add 3,900,000 to the population... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Never Mind there was no indians in Justianian's nor Kevz's time, and I'm not willing to look for others before them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevz Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Yes strangely its true in fact when my Japanense exiles got to India it was completley empty if I recall O.o and then of course we left for a slice of Russia and became a Japanese/Russian mixture of people Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mirreille Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Very Simply PutCan I RP a Chinese Nation in India Some say I can't. But shouldn't I be able to control my demographics? Ummm.... Come up with some sort of RP that explains how they got there, and I don't see why it would be a problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyFallout Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Ummm.... Come up with some sort of RP that explains how they got there, and I don't see why it would be a problem. What this person said. Just like how I ended up having a Korean majority in Taiwan/South China for a while. Case closed. *me stamps the case file with the "GM Stamp of Closure" * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 1: Just no to 120 NM a day, thats a lot of your fancy little launchers, each of which would cost several million dollars USD, empty. (And you just made that number up, I read your little factbook, and that number is no where to be seen) Thats half a knot. Perfectly reasonable. 4: OH yes, pointing missiles at every nation in the world (Honestly an aggressive act in and of it's self) and saying "If your so scared, come sign a treaty!" is in no way persuading them, nay, forcing them to sign it for their own safety Yeah, its not a nice move, but repercussions will follow. 5: I wouldn't post anything in your threads if you stopped metagaming and godmodding. It helps to read the rules of both CNRP and the forums. You can't do half the things you claim, and lately, you've been out of control with the rule breaking of your posts. Its possible, but not smart or easy. 7: Yes, buoyancy is the upward force that keeps things afloat. The net upward buoyancy force is equal to the magnitude of the weight of fluid displaced by the body. This force enables the object to float or at least seem lighter. That definition is all you should need. Buoyant things float, they don't like to stay in one place, suspended in the middle of a body of water, they will push to get to the surface. Water gets more dense with depth, so you can stay at one depth depending on the density you give the crawler. EDIT: Also, assuming you're using a torpedo that can take out a ship with one shot, a single one costs up to 2.9 million dollars, 1/1000 of your GDP. The torpedoes alone would bankrupt you, not to mention the launchers and the missiles. Sounds like he has you here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tahsir Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 LVN, I think the bigger issue is the squaring of ocean area he would have every 120 NM outward linear push. You can only sqaure production so far before you hit a limit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.