pigsticker

to a well-deserved rest crush. Hi Draden

this argument might have worked if WF took this stance after the initail attacks. Apparently WF changed their stance after the yfell for fake sscreenshots and ignored the original peace agreement. UED might have been at fault initially, but WF and VE, by extension, made the whole incident worst then it should be by falling for a trick.

always like seeing VE speak for their allies who never make a single post in their defense... :lol: does signing a treaty with VE prohibits their leaders to make posts on the OWF?? finally, someone from WF speaks... but only when the !@#$ has hit the fan and he comes to apologise and takes all the blame on him and his alliance even though VE and WF were both agitating for the war... wonderful....

still trying to figure out a bombastic fake cb... give us some time, we're think of something that will look so fake that you just can't believe it's fake.

congratulations to me

Best post I've seen so far and this i feel is one heck of a point of all the points you made. The silence from the government of OV is deafening...

Correct me if I'm wrong, I posting from what I have managed to understand from all the posts so far. Petar is the remaining Trium from the previous administration and Sethb just returned from VE and is holding no government positions. All I've seen so far is postings by Sethb and none by Petar, which is surprising to me. Albeit Sethb holds an important place in OV's past, but he's leaving the game in one month's time (??), shouldn't someone from the existing government be handling this rather than someone who wouldn't be part of the alliance in the not-so distant future?

What's it to you? If OV says the matter is resolved, then the matter is resolved. I believe this is an issue between OV and GUN. I'm beginning to believe Schatt's words more and more...

it has been a slow day

you know, if you really believe that TOP and MHA are the most survivalist alliances out there, feel free to cancel on them. After all, they would probably bail on you at the first sign of trouble. And if you believe that TOP and MHA are the most survivalist alliances out there, and you still persist in allying with them, what does this say about your alliance's survivalist instincts? Go figure...

See, the top spot is a poisoned chalice. Ain't you glad TOP took it from you... I bet within weeks, TOP will be the next ebil alliance bent on world hegemony .... who cares about the truth... it's sensationalism that counts....

well, McDonald's tried to sue a curry shop in Malaysia for using the name McCurry... go figure

it's just a NAP... PC and TPF has shown in the last war the uselessness of NAPs... not going to lose any sleep over this..

just a quick question to your point 1 : Assuming TDO does the reverse to NSO by recruiting and proclaiming the virtues/benefits of neutrality. You can't blame them can you since all they are doing is to peel off people who aren't a part of the community since only people who aren't really a part of the community would be enticed by a recruitment message. In addition, it would improve the integrity of your alliance by removing the misfits and malcontents who probably will flee at the first sight of war. Your stand and reply on this is greatly appreciated. Cheers

smart move where's ouchnesssssssss??

We will never be able to get it right in the eyes of everyone. What's most important is that we know we have done what we could and should. That's enough for us. Cheers

well the shocker of the year might be NPO and IRON leaving next

Great work by the team again... :lol:

大多无害的联盟

la la la la la la, la la la la la smurfs rocks and so do we grats to all who were sanctioned

i'm in singapore using starhub... nope... still can't register...

can't register for the game... it says i've been banned. but i haven't even played this game before.