AirMe

[quote name='feestaap1' timestamp='1323719821' post='2875491'] and my help to this post! [img]http://img828.imageshack.us/img828/4912/farkfail5.jpg[/img] [/quote] Why are you being redundant? They are breaking apart is enough. Breaking apart into pieces is just being redundant. What else would they break apart into?

While this era of unpredictability is a nice change...I have to say, DT has one of the most valid and most recent grudges to settle. I am finding it hard to come up with even an ounce of moral indignation anymore and I am kind of enjoying watching the chaos. Moralist down. Moralist down.

I give this 5 out of 5 Schatts. Happy Hunting my friends.

[quote name='Trinite' timestamp='1323462033' post='2871118'] NPO publicly declared their support of TOP/IRON against Polar (Fark's ally for some reason). Fark's attack diverted alliances from their allies. It's iffy, and I certainly have some qualms about it, but it makes sense. CnG hit someone who had done no such thing. I'm not saying that MHA was going to stay nuetral, but there is literally nobody left on our side. This doesn't dictate where anyone will be except MHA, and it gaurantees that they will be on CnG. Who are they protecting? If MHA was going to hit TLR, which they weren't, then GATO and ODN are still there too jump on them, and TLR should hardly be fully engaged with Fark with all the help they've got. Instead, they gaurantee that XX and CnG are beating the crap out of each other with everyone else involved on this front completely free from the threat of counters. So we get XX and CnG who don't really have a problem with each other beating each other down. I mean, it's not just that ODN hit our ally. We expected that eventually. It sucks, but CnG rolls together. We understand. It's more that it was stupid to do this. Everyone we like loses. For one, that was in defense of their ally (so not aggresively... kind of a big difference). Also, Asgaard is going to win that war. And additionally, MJ and SF have some !@#$ to work out. Lots of reasons. [/quote] I believe it was stated multiple times that they claimed to have irrefutable evidence you were going to attack Non Grata who is allied to TLR thus bringing in C&G. It was stupid for FARK to hit NPO for a declaration of support.

[quote name='Proest' timestamp='1323429903' post='2870822'] Wow. What a load of crock the declarations against MHA are tonight. Absolutely stunning. So, without a proper and noted casus beli, the forces of Complaints and Grievances (apparently now led by GATO) + Hooligans and TPE attacked the MHA for supposedly planning to attack TLR (lol? paranoid?) whom has been trolling us in #MHA for days now because we *haven't* attacked them and they *want* us to attack them to defend Fark. Okay, first things on this: MHA is a sovereign alliance whom has allies, like most of everyone else. Now, when a war occurs, allies strategically plan their moves, yes? Apparently, MHA is not allowed time to discuss and design plans for execution of assistance in a proper format and when so requested by her allies. Apparently, MHA is supposed to move to the whims and desires of those attacking our allies -- all right, I guess that's a fair demand, in a way. Not at all mentally balanced, but maybe fair. I would like to point out that MHA has been attacked by four alliances for absolutely no reason whatsoever other than some paranoid delusion that we somehow find TLR soo magnetic that we were pulled in by their constant harassment and lost in their glory that we just *had* to attack them. lol, yeah, right. Okay, so, now that the obvious has been pointed out, what does Complaints and Grievances + crew say to this? I am sure the answer will be soo amazing it will change the planet forever. But, I highly doubt that. Dishonor is the way of the world now. EDIT: Grammatical error. [/quote] Where was your indignation when NPO got attacked for no reason by your ally FARK? That's what I thought. This is a text book example of blatant hypocrisy. The blame lies with your allies, not with ODN or C&G.

It makes me so happy to see Raman Mew-Mew back.

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1323275785' post='2867364'] 2 million NS to 13 thousand NS and the loss of 80% of members. If this is really round two then we will fight this war in that context and we will show the same mercy that was shown in round one. [/quote] To quote one of my children: "I like you."

[quote name='Enamel32' timestamp='1323234778' post='2866873'] Liquid Mercury, do you actually think TOP would declare an aggressive war with a flimsy CB if they didn't think they had overwhelming majority support of the community? No offense dude, but seriously? I could go on and assault TOP's lack of balls for plotting said curbstomp, but I won't do that, because I do honestly think TOP is a good alliance with plenty of balls, but I can't deny the fact (and I can't see why you would either) that it is just plain stupid, to declare an aggressive war, with a silly CB, without having strawpolled for overwhelming support of the masses. [/quote] Is there any real estate left under the rocks you have been living under?

That was a nice blitz you guys had.

[quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1323220300' post='2866505'] It's ok, you don't yet understand. When they are done with everyone else and come for you, we will stand with you as well. [/quote] I don't think you understand the bond that TLR shares with people they choose as their allies. In fact, I am sure that you can't even comprehend how far these guys would go for someone they are allied to. And if they needed someone to stand with them, I can guarantee you would be very low on the list of the people who they would call.

[quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1323214554' post='2866279'] We voluntarily signed onto the losing end of this curbstomp and don't expect/demand Polar return the favor. Our treaty with Polar automatically downgrades on Christmas day. Which makes the anti-RIA sigs even funnier really. [/quote] Wow....I don't....what is this?......I don't even. Seriously?

[quote name='AmbroseIV' timestamp='1323214291' post='2866261'] Have fun GO; don't fall asleep, Oldie. In a war where an ODP triggered an oA clause, an oA clause and then [i]finally[/i] a third oA clause all as part of the initial counter, I think we're pretty lucky that people bother to post anything. [/quote] Sorry, knowing the order of operations when it comes to declaring war is Alliance Leadership 101...probably even 098.

[quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1323209067' post='2866083'] This makes no sense considering our treaty will expire before the war ends and we signed it knowing Polar was about to get hit. The rest of your post is just kind of dumb and extrapolates out from there. [/quote] Wait. What?

[quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1323213216' post='2866221'] To be fair, it's only Sparta [/quote] This. That was a pathetic excuse for a blitz.

[quote name='rsoxbronco1' timestamp='1323212674' post='2866172'] [img]http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj125/kleven316/gowarflag.jpg[/img] There are more missiles in your flag than there are DoWs agains Olympus. Just sayin' [/quote] What are you talking about? That blitz was face melting. I heard defensive monitoring systems had their screen savers activate is was so action packed.

[quote name='ccabal86' timestamp='1323164930' post='2865572'] A returning classic [IMG]http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/6417/farknoooo.jpg[/IMG] [/quote] This truly is a classic. It comes up in every war.

[quote name='TimLee' timestamp='1323143769' post='2864908'] CSN not entering. How delicious. [/quote] Well given how they endorsed FARK's "diversionary tactic" aka preemption. I am sure they wouldn't complain if someone else used them as a "diversionary tactic."

Give them hell Olympus and BAPS! Happy Hunting.

Most entertaining DoW. Happy Hunting my friends.

Happy Hunting TPF!

[quote name='Krack' timestamp='1322950131' post='2860965'] Just to make sure I'm understanding you correctly ... 1. You acknowledge I criticized alliances pre-emptively attacking other alliances in the past, 2. You believe FARK and FAN is pre-emptively attacking you now,* 3. Aloha would be an alliance of crybabies if it doesn't assist FARK in pre-emptively attacking you now. Yup, you guys are an alliance of rocket surgeons. [size="1"]* As has been stated in several places (including the original posted DoW and my posts), this is a DoW based on a 5 year old CB - [u]not[/u] a pre-emptive attack. Unless of course you were planning on attacking FARK and FAN ... [u]and[/u] they found out about it which prompted this attack. Was NPO planning on attacking FARK and FAN?[/size] [/quote] So is this war connected to the Polaris war or is this a new war?

[quote name='Krack' timestamp='1322941758' post='2860841'] AFAIK, yes. EDIT: They were bit players (in this particular matter), but they were involved. As was true of most things back then, NPO were the ring leaders and calling the shots. [/quote] So the question needs to be asked, how many times does one alliance need to be persecuted for past crimes? I get FAN's beef. Totally. I would argue FARK loses grievance rights for the situation after they singed that MDoAP with NPO back in the day.

[quote name='Krack' timestamp='1322938431' post='2860789'] GOONS were responsible for starting the war. NPO were responsible for making sure it lasted six months, pulling over 50% of FARK's membership away, making up lies about them, and installing a viceroy. [/quote] Wasn't FAN also responsible for denying FARK peace during that conflict?

[quote name='Krack' timestamp='1322902308' post='2860454'] It's because they were responsible. NPO were the ones who talked Slayer into leaving FARK, trashing the alliance, and trying to pull all their new recruits to TF. [/quote] Except, GOONS were the ones that started the whole damn thing.

If this is real..... [01:27am] AirMe[Ronin]: i would laugh if polar peaced out [01:27am] AirMe[Ronin]: lol [01:28am] AirMe[Ronin]: i think i would literally roll around on the floor laughing