Jump to content

Anarquista

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    429

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Anarquista

  1. Anarquista
    the LSF alliance has obligations it has committed to at the current time
  2. Anarquista
    since never, we are talking about LSF members leaving the LSF for INT to fight the good fight, but guess that is out of the question now
  3. Anarquista
    apparently that by gone is not a by gone, if this operation is any indication, your motive is because we had a treaty obligation last war? yes, leaving your allies to burn against NOR, for the sake of being in CNG and not letting MK get destroyed, is equal to us bandwagoning with an MD ally that you hit (?), it's like you finally did a 180 degrees and figuratively issued a public apology, many of our more emotionally-charged members, who held anti-INT sentiment, were ready to don the INT AA to help you against NOR, but then this was brought to our attention and that's why we can't have nice things
  4. Anarquista
    there has been no spying form LSF or any DL member, if there is evidence to the contrary please bring it, but you should try to keep your house in order, many INT members like craig have openly admitted to this operation, and there have been attempt(s) in the past to get UCR to merge in INT that have all failed and now that you have been handed the opportunity to fight NOR, due to NG being preoccupied, you conveniently dismiss this situation as being "not worth" the sad part is that this opportunity with NOR came too late (about a year and a half late), but would have seen us working closer together and let by gones be by gones
  5. Anarquista
    r.i.p. left unity 11/08/13 - 11/12/13 true holding him so that the UCR decide what to do with him maybe you didn't want to incriminate yourself? :ph34r:
  6. Anarquista
    caution contents hot :gun:
  7. Anarquista
    whoa whoa whoa, no one is accusing us of being spies
  8. Anarquista
    :psyduck: :blink: :wacko: :facepalm:
  9. Anarquista
    good luck my x-crossed friends :gun:
  10. Anarquista
    i can't read but i enjoyed the picture a lot :)
  11. Anarquista
    ubuntu the great, to my knowledge, we have not attacked any POWs so far, what do you think about using POWs to attack the alliance they surrendered from, what would you do with defectors and traitors?
  12. Anarquista
    DBDC is on all 19 sides of this war? :blink:
  13. Anarquista
    it is two seperate wars, kaskus will surrender to our coalition of Shangri-la and allies, whereas i'm not sure which way the main war will go in favor
  14. Anarquista
    what exactly is your question? are you protecting POWs which should remain out of the conflict for the duration, or traitors?
  15. Anarquista
    well, to be honest, i didn't know if these tactics were used against you last war, we were focused on our own front, and you are approving it on a government level if you allow that nation into your alliance after knowing the fact of the sanctions
  16. Anarquista
    we have been speaking with a kaskus diplo about this guy (BONES), even before he was in kaskus he was in spatr (kaskus MDOAP ally), now he is an approved member of kaskus, and the diplo seems to not know or acting purposely ignorant about the situation, it's not misguided
  17. Anarquista
    :popcorn: better than commie drama
  18. Anarquista
    yeah kaskus (or at least a member) has done this tactic against members of the revolutionary bloc, Die Linke from both LSF and SWF! i have screenshots to prove it
  19. Anarquista
    we can have two seperate outcomes, among the entire conflict so, it is two wars
  20. Anarquista
    what does the box represent?
  21. Anarquista
    i am also on this list :blink:
  22. Anarquista
    it is in the box o smaller alliances :)
  23. Anarquista
    roll 'em :war:
  24. Anarquista
    it looks kinda jumbled now :wacko:
  25. Anarquista
    good work gopher :gun:
×
×
  • Create New...