Krashnaia

More fail.

Congrats on peace

Congrats on peace. Another one out.

If you want to keep my tonge, you'll have to get it first from me. And given your war efectiveness, I'm more likely to snatch and keep your name instead.

Come on. I must give you guys some credit were it's due: Your plans manage to fail so spectaculary that they achieve amazing results. I mean: - You gang upon an alliance credited as totally worthless, they emerge as a military machine everyone wants to be allied to - You plot to roll Polaris, NpO and TOP become close allies. NpO and TOP, of all people. That one was Gold. What's your next challenge? If I maybe so bold as to suggest... - Join Neutrality, GPA becomes a warmonger. - Ally Nordreich, they convert to Marxism-Leninism. - Bloc Treaty DBDC, they all end up with zero tech. - Plot to kill the Game, Planet Bob grows over 100k nations. Sky is the limit, dude.

You, on the other hand, have failed to make an impression on me. Please improve.

Well, to be fair you did not have much rep left to lose at that point. But somewhat you managed to outperform yourselves and firmly attach your alliance tag to the rock bottom. Your performance in this war has shown once again that learning from defeats isn't your forte. Now you have a surrender to post. You guys know the drill, it's how you tend to end your wars.

Let's be fair, NSO lost all his militar credibility in the Tetris-Legion war. And you have lived to that reputation in this last conflict with that amazig negative damage diferential. So, as someone already said, don't throw stones from a glasshouse.

And all this drama comes to an end...

I can't recall one single Global War in which any relevant alliance from the winning coalition changed sides in middle of the war. Oh, wait, NPO in eQ. Good that they are on the other side this time. And, all of a sudden, keeping under check the guys who were overtly planning an agressive war against you to cover their own faults, turns you into someone plotting aggresive wars yourself. Nordreich, of course. Where else?

No, it was NPO who screwed up everyone else so that their allies on the other side would get an easy ride. Then you attempted to frame XX for the fiasco but, as the current events show, no one bought your bullshit.

Problem with your logic is, NPO proved in eQ that they are unreliable to work with. Therefore, no one in the current winning coalition wants to work with them in the future. You pretend to convince us that NPO will come to the rescue of the weak and abused? As her past record proves, in such an event they will sit out or side with the stronger side. If I'm the stronger I don't need them, and if I'm the weaker I don't want them joining the dogpile.

Looks like something you should get used to do

That makes sense. Save a few Peace Mode days for NPO's hippie high tier, at the expense of having the low tier (who have been fighting for three months) pay tech reps. Par for the course for Pacifica.

Good idea. Let's get coherent and apply the terms to NoR, too. NPO, always caring for the well-being of her coalition mates.

Last time Umbrella\GOONS\TOP took NPO out of play through terms, they got NPO fighting for DH in the next two global wars. So, if I've understood correctly, your line basically breaks down to: "Don't allow ex-DH to enforce terms on us, because you'll be next and we will help them. And by the time you manage to build a coalition strong enough to beat them, we'll backpedal in middle of the war and allow them to escape." Not the most brilliant position to hold, but be my guest.

Go on, NPO. Continue letting your allies burn for the well-being of your tops tiers who remain safely in Peace Mode. And, BTW, the concept of "Banking Nations" who must remain in PM during a war to give reconstruction aid post-war, has been outdated for a while ago. With the amount of warchest the high-tier nations have, any self-respecting high-tier naton can get involved, rebuild and give aid, all at the same time.

The New York Times calls them "articles", too... and CNN or Fox News claim to be impartial and objective. Truth is, every news agency is nothing more than a propaganda machine. The idea that there exists such a thing like "impartial opinions" is stupid. Every human being has an opinion influenced by his interests (or by what he believes are his interests). So, calling Franz a propagandist is quite redundant. Every one of us, is.

About time Congrats everyone for Peace.

And, the news are? I mean, nothing new coming from Umbrella. :P

Hail our new overlords o/ MI6

Welcome, CCC! Give them hell.

Well, last Global War was way, way shorter than most of the people around here wanted it to be. So it makes sense that the current war lags way, way longer than the average Global War. I also think that reps are retarded, and in this case, that reps aimed at discouraging the use of Peace Mode are double retarded. Because Peace Mode provides over 50% of all the debate during any Global War. Without it, what would we be arging about? The OWF would surely die.

How to save CN: 1) Hire a graphic designer 2) Publicit your game, if only a little

Except that, in order to be a employer/employee situation, the "Employer" would need to have possesion of the means of production, which in a tech-deal remains fully in control of the seller. The "Employer" would also need to purchase just the workforce of the Seller to produce a merchandise that the Employer will later comercialize in order to obtain capital. Instead of purchasing a full, finished product for his own private use. Remember: A capitalist invest capital to purchase means of production and labour in order to produce merchandise that is comercialized to obtain more capital. In a tech deal, the objective of the buyer is not to produce more capital, but to purchase a commodity for himself, which the seller produces more efficiently. You can twist marxist terminology as much as you wish, but that will not make your thesis any less ridiculous from a marxist point of view. Whatever. As it has been already proven, the tech-deals are not exploitiative, and they don't damage the sellers in any way, so they can't be categorized as "rapacious". Also, notice that for young nations to ever get close to the amount of tech possesed by high-tier nations, they'll have to become tech-buyers themselves. Otherwise, they'll never have enough NS to be allowed to attack the "gerontocracy" by the game mechanics, and thus will be unable to deposses the "gerontocracy" from it's accumulation of tech.