Krashnaia

Congrats, |Y|yTh. You managed to make 'smurf look like 13. If you improve your beating on him, you may get him look like an adult by the end of this conflict.

Hey, look, the poor guy even thinks that using bold will actually make his statements look more mature or badass or something. What will be the next from Lord Inchcock? ALLCAPS? :lol1:

And then Lord Smallcock appeared in the thread, and you all cared to argue with him. :P I mean, Kaskus no longer has a high tier (despite the NEW ghosts), and is well in the way of no longer having a mid-tier, either. So any Kaskus ghost coming here and typing we are wimps who suck at war, will look like an idiot by default, no need for us to actually having to reply anything. ;)

Thank you Ogaden 0/

Butthurt or not, masta is way better than all of you. He's obsessed with ewooks having sex on a couch, you can't be better than that.

That's life. We all seek answers, but only find teapots.

Clearly not enough pages, still.

Many people join an alliance just for protection. They tend to aim for the strongest ones. Then they become peons and, frankly, they deserve it. But many people, too, join alliances because they want to play the political game. And active people are always welcomed in the goverment of most alliances, specially nowdays. You just need to find one that allows your voice to be part of the chorus, instead of treating you as a peon. They exist.

Well, under some circles, pouring the tea first from the teapot is taken as a direct insult to the hostess - as in, your cups are so dirthy I better kill the germs off with boiling water first.

That's what the teapot is for - dissolving the tea bag in the hot water. Pouring into the cup comes later. The eternal dilemma is wheter to pour the milk first into the coup, then the tea, or pour the tea first, then the milk.

Well, if some alliance attempts to re-introduce forced disbandment, you can bet all most enough of the other alliances in the game will roll her, ravage her allies, burn her house, and kill her livestock.

Individual nations group with other nations to form alliances. Alliances sign treaties with other Alliances to form Blocs. And the treaties and animosity between blocs drive the global political game. To tell it quick, there are basically three sides: - Side A - Side B - The Neutrals The Neutrals are alliances who stand out of politics. They do not mess with other alliances and, until recently, were respected by the others. If you want to watch the lawn grow, join one of these. Green Protection Agency or World Task Force are two examples of Neutral alliances. Side A and Side B are generic names for the two blocs of alliances who at any given moment are plotting to destroy each other. Name, leaders, alliances and relative strengh varies from year to year. Each year there is one or, if we are lucky, two global wars compromising the two main blocs and most of the alliances, and once in a while one of these Globals changes the scenario so much that Side A and Side B break up and reform under new names and shapes. Traditionally, one of the Blocs would be hegemonic in the game. But since the downing of the last Hegemony two years ago, there is no longer an hegemonic Bloc. That has not stopped us from having fun global wars. And that's basically it. Pick an alliance whose theme you like, and carry on. Your alliance will tell you who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. If you don't like it, then switch alliance, and your new leaders will tell you who are now your good guys and your bad guys. Repeat until you find a place you fit in.

Are you sure this was not about Taget making it beyond 5 million casualties so he could purchase the National Cementery? :lol1: Now behave like a good boy and I'll tell you more supra sikrets about this war.

The Thread is still young.

He is truly ahead of his time.

We understood them as just trolling from 'smurf. Didn't help to set our people on a peace-loving mood, though. But, well, we all know 'smurf is not the most brilliant diplomat in the world, soooo... par for the course, coming from him.

49

.

Maybe you could start with a link to that statement by MI6 about we going to require 6 aid slots for every ghost? If you are so upset because those DBDC nations offered peace to us before firing the first nuke, talk about it with them in private. Will be more productive for you than nitpicking and discussing semantics here.

I understand that you are upset because DBDC won't be coming to win your war for you. But, you know, you should talk about it with them in private.

MI6 made the statement that anyone ghosting Kaskus would have to reach it's own peace agreement. And that's exactly what happened here. If you have any problem with it, maybe you should talk with DBDC about it. If Bones decides to sell down 300,000 NS and attack us, we will deal with him. But for some reason I don't see that happening.

I fail to see any problem we have to deal with

Why would we ask our allies to hit someone who hasn't attacked us? If you want to see our allies involved in war so bad, then go, do it yourself. And why would we want to attack Bones, to begin with?

I find specially funny the part in which Bones would need to lose 300,000 NS worth in property for anyone in Mi6 being able to hit him.

Unknown Smurf babbling b*llsh*t in a thread? I have a deja vu. Again. And again. And again. And...