Jump to content

AmbroseIV

Members
  • Posts

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by AmbroseIV

  1. [quote name='magicninja' timestamp='1340436426' post='2993410'] Pretty much just going off what has been posted by you guys. Perhaps get your story straight and post an official response so people like you stop trying to make pals look bad for backing you up. [/quote] Aggressively defending the bad position you guys put yourselves in (as well as trying to claim a moral high ground at the same time as pretending it doesn't matter) is what makes you look bad — not VL/INT being honest.
  2. [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1340428482' post='2993282'] I guess some people are just here to mingle. [/quote] Every alliance has their own goals. If the community and friends they want to maintain is more important than being #1, at least they're realistic. And if everyone was as ambitious as MK or NPO... you wouldn't have the satellite alliances that support them; better or worse, that's a world that none of us know.
  3. [quote name='Rogal Dorn' timestamp='1340427420' post='2993253'] who is this alliance? did anyone read the OP? [/quote] The Resistance was a lifeless, former-LEO alliance that KDII merged into and hijacked a little while back. Given his past exploits, I'm surprised something this stupid hasn't happened sooner. Should be fun for all involved!
  4. [quote name='berbers' timestamp='1340251113' post='2991186'] It's a please to fight alongside you R&R. o/ R&R [/quote] Likewise
  5. Sparta reciprocates NG's dislike of them? [i][b]And[/b][/i] they have massive awards in their signatures?! They truly are terrible people. [spoiler]Is that how I was supposed to react? I'm not too sure... there doesn't seem to be any cohesive point to this. You might as well have done a logdump from their public channel; saved time and effort. [/spoiler]
  6. [quote name='Enamel32' timestamp='1340151727' post='2989426'] I never said that either. I was just trying to make some sense out of your post. It comes off hypocritical. [/quote] Don't worry, this is what C&G actually believes. [spoiler]Liz is the real puppetmaster.[/spoiler]
  7. [quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1340142731' post='2989234'] Another hurray for someone who gets it. [/quote] Stop encouraging him, dammit. :|
  8. Congrats on your anniversary TLR... and just for you, Cata [center][img]http://i.imgur.com/rutqX.png[/img][/center] [quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1340078080' post='2988457'] The game needs about 12,000 more of you my friend. You get it, no nonsense. [/quote] One DB is too much... but 12,000? Let's not say things you can't take back. :| [quote name='magicninja' timestamp='1340078257' post='2988464'] They chose not to activate optional aggression with LSF and chose to understand that sending in RnR first was trying to play (like last war) CnG's sympathies towards eachother's allies. It worked last war and GATO sit by and let RnR hit LoSS. Not this noche. [/quote] Not exactly, and I need to clarify this: [spoiler]Before the last war really took off we made very clear to INT, who (unlike FOK) weren't going to put themselves [i]completely[/i] out there for us (and understandably so, it was the first time they were really torn between old allies and new allies), that we weren't going to crush them between a rock and a hard place — our respective blocs were going to be on opposite sides, no point in ruining a relationship by expecting or demanding something impossible. They had their fight and we had ours. So, one of R&R's targets was LoSS to take pressure off RIA and let them worry about their other wars. We're comparable tier-wise; they had more large nations but we fought them the previous war for the exact same reason. We told INT at the time (again) not to worry about us, we'd be happy to fight GATO if you hit us and we expected it — FOK did too and while it was assumed that PB wouldn't back them for a PB/C&G conflict, a lot of members still wanted a chance to finish what was started in the UJW. People were slightly disappointed that it didn't eventuate... but if GATO didn't hit us last war it wasn't because we took advantage of INT — given the "you can't hide behind FOK now!" sentiment and knowing that we told INT multiple times [i]not[/i] to put themselves out for us, I don't think you can hide behind them. Call us naive for not being completely and utterly ruthless, but don't pretend we dick around our allies. If they tried to protect us... well, it was of their own volition definitely helps explain why we're still allies even if many others in their sphere don't approve, but we certainly didn't expect (let alone demand) it. That said... R&R doesn't really have a problem with GATO, we all seem to get along fine of late and I'm sure this will be a fun war, but I object to the recurring insinuation that we took advantage of INT to keep GATO off us — it was your choice... and ties into why I've objected to C&G publically pressuring INT to pull them out of a tight spot. Self-preservation is admirable, and props for being part of a sphere with enough influence that it can start one war to get out of another... but you (literally, and then others in C&G too) promoted the issue as if INT (as an extension of their allies) was an inconvenience at best and if they made the wrong choice it'd ruin you all. I take issue with that because INT deserve better (irrespective of their eventual choice) from [i]allies[/i] and we really wouldn't do the same — yeah, that's pretty idealistic... but then I'm still not sure why anyone's wasting time trying to defend how anxious C&G was over this issue when you then claim people should drop that and play more politics. I'm glad VL tried to present the issue in a blunt/objective way. Kind of salvages INT's reputation as part of the farcical back-and-forth, at least.[/spoiler]
  9. ... people get [i]exactly[/i] what they want and still aren't happy? Tough crowd. [quote name='Tromp' timestamp='1340043748' post='2987826'] This is cute. Thanks for admitting what a cowards you guys were last war though. And apparently you haven't lost this trait. Good on you! [/quote] Maybe he's just bitter and dislikes FOK from the UJW... then again, and depending on who you ask, GATO left us alone last war out of respect for INT. Either way, R&R's fault for publically shaming our allies into supporting us during the last wa-... wait, sorry — that didn't happen... I got R&R confused with someone else. :|
  10. [quote name='MitchellBade' timestamp='1339983050' post='2986892'] This is good and all but the more pressing matter at hand is, how does RnR feel about becoming a gay superhero? oh and o/ RnR [/quote] Hang on... is that why we're being baited and persecuted by these tyrants? [i]For shame[/i]!
  11. [quote name='magicninja' timestamp='1339683082' post='2983349'] I don't think anyone has any notion that we wouldn't rather be rolling on SF but the truth of the matter is that if Int rolls so do we. Just about everyone knows this to be true. That is why it is such a big deal to all involved and even those who aren't. INT knows where we stand. The decision is theirs. [/quote] It's a shame most C&G member's comments read as if you're publically guilting INT into ignoring LSF. "We know you've been promising them support so we went to all the trouble of endorsing this war to better position MK and ourselves... it'd be a shame if something screwed it up now, but we'll let you guys make the call. [i]No pressure[/i]. ... D'YOU HEAR THAT EVERYONE ELSE? IT'S INT'S DECISION, BUT WE'RE FINE WITH IT!" Especially Rush in the 'unofficial' DoW. Whether intentional or just careless, it's all pretty weak.
  12. This is unfortunate to see - as Garion suggested, you did yourselves proud last war and it was fun to fight against you. Apparatus seem like nice guys too but I wish all the best for your members wherever they end up.
  13. We can revise history later and make it a strategic victory for SF, a la WotC/noCB for another party (who I can't quite recall...) At any rate: congrats NPL! (... because I think NPL have probably been mentioned less than Mj and Deinos - maybe the comic [i]was[/i] too vague? )
  14. I can't go the entire announcement without congratulating the right party, so... congrats NPL! [quote name='Garion' timestamp='1337619646' post='2970280'] Are you guys really being smug about last war against NPL? O_o [/quote] Maybe they're condemning GOONS and NPL in the one go. "GOONS swarmed and beat you! [i]GOONS[/i]! They were only 5 times your size!"
  15. [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1337253789' post='2968578'] RnR successfully maintains its long and noble history of holding treaties with every corner of the world. [/quote] [s]Isn't that the tagline, "gotta catch 'em all"?[/s] [s]We'll swap you a GOD treaty for NoR and... euhm... MHA for TOP?[/s] Don't worry, MK can roll us next war - I promise.
  16. D'awww, NATO - congrats! Well, congratulations to both of you in fact, but NATO's on fire these last couple of days and it's great to see.
  17. We took too long to formalise this - it really has been fantastic getting to know you guys and I'm sure this relationship'll last a long time. [i][size="1"]Now, to disregard NATO and acquire [s]SF[/s]/[s]XX[/s]/[s]PB[/s]/[s]C&G[/s]/[s]ex-Heg[/s]/PF[/size][/i]
  18. It's fantastic to see an alliance who doesn't just cut 'n run but actually resolves to help an ally when things get tough - a special kudos to you, NATO, but congratulations to both.
  19. [quote name='Stewie' timestamp='1336654029' post='2965848'] Over 80% of FOK voted to join NG after intense discussion on what they wanted to do as an alliance. It was an alliance member decision to search for new pastures, not just the government at the top. [/quote] Out of respect for FOK, I won't dispute this... but you should be careful before someone who really isn't happy with this decision actually does. It'd be nicer if this announcement were just a celebration of everything FOK's achieved, is that too much to ask? :| Remember when they forced AiD to surrender in UJW? Good times.
  20. [i]R&R will honour our treaty with FOK and be watching over the AA indefinitely, even in the absence of any official government, until the alliance is officially disbanded as per the FOK! charter. This is a show of respect and loyalty toward our long-standing allies: attempts to abuse this gesture will be treated on an individual basis.[/i] Personally, this is quite a sad moment. I've had a (sometimes one-sided or forgotten) love affair going with FOK since we first met in UJW and, after joining R&R, I was happy about having the opportunity to work with FOK again as much as anything else. It's been a pleasure knowing [s]most[/s] all of you, both personally and professionally... you're the most consistent friend and ally I've had over the last 4.5 years 'n to say you'll be missed is an understatement — it's been... a lot of fun. I wish it wasn't ending. I hope FOK's culture becomes the preeminent one in NG, that you don't just fade away and that all of your members are very happy wherever they end up. Again, it's been a pleasure guys.
  21. Ewww, Semi :v Congrats guys — very nice looking, deserved line-up
  22. Congrats TPF - INT are very good allies to have Also, something something lolcommie
  23. [quote name='CheeKy' timestamp='1333810448' post='2949571'] Are you serious or is this an attempt to troll? Anyway congrats. [/quote] If I was trolling, I'd follow your example 'n do whatever I could to spend the next 6 months banned from FOK's public channel ... and bitter isn't a look that suits you.
×
×
  • Create New...