Jump to content

Frostfirefox

Members
  • Posts

    468
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Frostfirefox

  1. [quote name='Clash' date='08 June 2010 - 07:51 PM' timestamp='1276048272' post='2329486'] See the difference? [/quote] No, just pointing out your posts contradicted each other, I would rather not argue lesser logic and just wait for jonboy to answer my question himself ^-^
  2. [quote name='Clash' date='08 June 2010 - 07:29 PM' timestamp='1276046976' post='2329447'] Meh it's all the same bloc when they all share the same DoW. o/ "our side" [/quote] Wait I thought you wanted 1v1 war, which if you keep them seperated, you have with the vault, so doesn't this contradict everything you have said?
  3. Meh I don't fiddle with truth because truth is a lie, as ironic as it sounds. And a second question, when you say his bloc, do you mean the MHA, Umbrella, MCXA one (the one he is literally in) or the FARK, SMUG, AoD, RE one which he is the public face of?
  4. [quote name='JonBoy16' date='08 June 2010 - 01:27 PM' timestamp='1276025228' post='2329057'] This makes me again wonder why Marcus is still in power at MHA. It seems like anyone he brings with him gets crushed. NOTE: No member of his current bloc remains in the top 5%. [/quote] How can you put others fighting skills entirely on the shoulders of one person? You act as though everyone gave him their passwords and he is the only one fighting.
  5. [quote name='Mayzie' date='08 June 2010 - 05:54 AM' timestamp='1275998040' post='2328743'] Really? We didn't up until late yesterday afternoon. If you think this is part of some coalition war, if Confusion has said that we're fighting on the side of TPC and the rest, if he's said those were our intentions from the beginning because we refused to join in on his coalition war or whatever other nonsense you may have heard, you've heard wrong. This is exactly what it says it is in the OP, a war on the idiotic actions of one person who abused his momentary power by ordering sanctions on five members of an uninvolved alliance. Also, fail blitz is fail. Communication errors ftl. [/quote] Oh no, I expected something would come of Raidon's post, not specifically you would declare on MHA, but hey I'm not a genie <--- idk if thats even right
  6. I thought of the same thing not 2 weeks ago but it became lost in my brain. This idea is pure win
  7. Good luck, expected this to come That was pretty long for a short note =3
  8. [quote name='Confusion' date='05 June 2010 - 12:57 PM' timestamp='1275764228' post='2324721'] tl;dr Umbrella, Multicolored Cross-X Alliance, and Mostly Harmful Alliance hereby Declare War on The Phoenix Cobras; Fark, SWAT, Sovereign Mongers of Uber Greatness, Army of Darkness, and the Roman Empire hereby Declare War on Pork Shrimp, The Flying Kiwis, RnR, and Trollwith Defense Force; [b]The Vault hereby Declares War on The Warriors[/b]. [/quote] According to this, it is just vault vs warriors, or is there a general confusion on targets? as I see most bunching them all together in one huge war Totally confused on this war but do enjoy seeing the sight of war... Last post, GL all ^-^
  9. @ Warriors, I recall you egged confusion on in finding someone to hit you, so this should be everything you ever wanted no? Not meant to turn into a harsh blood feud of nonsense
  10. hmm regardless of everyone's feelings on this war and confusion, bias or not, it's about time war consumed all the majority of TE rather than 1 corner of it, and i do hope this war grows even more, i congratulate confusion on achieving such a thing even if he did backstab or 'confuse' people. what TE is supposed to be, in all it's glory, dedicated by Confusion and his 'wenches'
  11. lol k no strategies, it was just confusion
  12. its strategy from what i see, they know who their allies are but the defenders are still trying to figure out whats going on
  13. It's like a conspiracy or something, but uh ya, GL(o^_')o
  14. Well.... no offense to Roman Empire intended... but with their level of coordination... and fighting... you might as well take off 60% of their stats
  15. My 2 cents, your both wrong, LE and OP both continued attacks with or without knowing peace had been achieved, and any declares after white peace are rogue/raiding and will be dealt with as such. Agree to Disagree as now you guys are just biting each other rather than the topic
  16. That was fun until everyone entered bill lock ^-^ including many LE guys (I just hit it myself right on white peace)
  17. Lol if you don't like my comments don't respond to them, simple as that, I'm a bystander asking questions, so what. Your not obligated to respond to any of my comments, and yet you do, complaining about my comments, but either way this thread bores me as it's majorly off topic, if I wanted to be nagged I'd call my mom ^-^
  18. Can I not discuss this? Is this not the Open World Forum? Am I not part of Planet Steve? I would love to go away but I do thoroughly enjoy this topic regardless of your feelings on me 'butting in' when in all reality my comments have no effect on the wars outcome I'm just curious as to why you guys are so overly defensive to small comments?
  19. Lol im not a critic, I asked a question and it took you guys a while to answer it without going into details of stats and fair fights and what not, 'If warriors like war why not pick a better target,... like Trollwitch Defense Force' Not that hard of a question, but it was finally answered without using stats or your opinions over and over every single post you guys made, and the answer was you wanted a not so difficult target for your lower members. No need to get butt hurt over non existent criticism, just curious lol
  20. Lol sorry your so serious and have your panties in a bunch, I called you alliance cowards or cowardice
  21. Last round I was blitzed by Pork Shrimp twice the first time was wrong place wrong time and the second one, I enjoyed as I wasn't sight seeing a flake of an alliance Very nice achievement
  22. [quote name='Clash' date='30 May 2010 - 10:02 AM' timestamp='1275235345' post='2316678'] Pay closer attention, or learn to read. Either way works. If you actually look at all the stuff posted - or even do some homework and compare the alliances and their nation compositions - it is NOT a downhill fight. We each have around 20 nations. Our 10th nation is 700ns smaller than theirs. So what part is confusing you? How is that downhill for us? For over half our alliance it's uphill. They also had a higher average NS than we did when this war started. There was a lot more posted that apparently you didn't bother to read, and I'm not going to repeat it. Read better next time. Let's compare us and TDF, stooge. TDF: 26 nations, 24 active, average NS of 4641, 21 nations over 3000ns, 19 nukes. TW (at the time the war started): 22 nations, 17 active, average NS of around 3000, 7 nations over 3000ns, 50 nukes. Arguing that is a fair fight is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. The WAPA fight is a HELL of lot closer than that - it's actually fairly even, and overall, I suspect they might well win. What part is so confusing after looking at the facts? It seems to me that even making this claim means you have an ulterior motive in doing so - because it's hard pressed to say someone was naturally so ignorant. They have to be trying hard at it, I'm openly calling you an absolute blithering idiot who apparently wants us and TDF to fight for his own personal reasons. My posts have stats and facts. Yours has a stupid biased opinion. Learn to tell the difference, [/quote] This post is irrelevant as the statements have finished and I got my answer to my question. Thank you for you time 'I'm openly calling you an absolute blithering idiot' Hey... I didn't make this personal you shouldn't either
  23. Lol war kinda halted when most were struck with bill lock
×
×
  • Create New...