Frostfirefox

[quote name='KOwens06' date='04 July 2010 - 01:28 PM' timestamp='1278271693' post='2359588'] This is TE not SE. TE Guidelines: [list] [*]Fair Fights [*]Short Wars [*]Allies get to sit on the sidelines and watch if rule one and two aren't broken [/list] We didn't break any rules. We actually gave them the advantage. BC just needed to go to Frogout. Say I want to strike back and figure something out. Not Bawwwww all over the place There so now you know how TE works. Its not about curbstomping. Its not about "Beating into submission." Its about let me emphasize here FUN and FAIR Wars. So if I am being irrational because you guys couldn't stay out of a perfectly good and honorable war then fine. Like Clash said [u]You're already doing it wrong.[/u] [/quote] Lol, really... did your mother hold your hand while you wrote that list? But since they are 'Guidelines', I'll gladly burn them now for future benefit of TE before we all go to refined gentle fighting like you sirs. But I do understand The Warriors are hypocrites, as last round The Warriors attacked someone weaker (it was even posted by I believe yourself that you weren't looking for a tough fight), and here you are scolding those who do what you do. Not to mention hypocrisy on other occasions. I have learned not to trust a single word that comes out of your guy's mouths as it is usually a brutal deformation of everything in order to escape the grave you dig so well for yourselves. So I assume next round when pick a fight in favor of yourselves you won't apply these guidelines. Eh?

[quote name='Therm' date='04 July 2010 - 12:06 AM' timestamp='1278223579' post='2359327'] Well, one hour after update, war is now nuclear. Enjoy increased GRL guys [/quote] I will, so long as more nukes hit the side I do not favor

Your trolling me, I just commented my thoughts and off you guys go directing your posts at me for what I said.

[quote name='Clash' date='03 July 2010 - 02:18 PM' timestamp='1278188293' post='2358914'] So that's a rather silly insult there on your part, isn't it? [/quote] I have done no insult on my part. Your postings do not even thoroughly address what I say, yet you quote me anyways... So since you want to discuss the war, I will do so briefly. If they are to much for you, find more allies and be to much for them. Or die. Otherwise, they are not to much for you and you should simply kill them instead of discussing the honor of them. Honor is one of a nation by nation field, not one of an alliance. Old kingdoms warriors fought with honor, but it did not mean they were fools enough not to find allies and march in with double the men of their enemies. But I suppose Honor and Intelligence can't mix with you around.

Oh hey clash. How's life? Good? Great. I smell no whine in my comment. And no contradictions. But I do sense you'd like to discuss this? _______________________ I love the mindset there is a [b]specific[/b] way of playing TE. It is as if the veterans who have played a few rounds, think they make the rules for TE. But TE is chaos, and only those who embrace chaos may [b]control[/b] it. Specific is not control. English 101. ________________________ And further specific to your comment- What'd you do, besides let your treaties lead you around by the nose? Take the you out please. I do not personally have any treaties. And further, why don't Warriors just go back to TPC. That way that statement wouldn't be hypocritical. ________________________ And on the way SF declared, it should be more focused on the way The Flying Kiwis declared if you wanted to state that. As they head on assaulted and then SF came out from behind so not so much head on war. ________________________ Things are going very smoothly and soon it will be time.

I love the mindset there is a specific way of playing TE. It is as if the veterans who have played a few rounds, think they make the rules for TE. But TE is chaos, and only those who embrace chaos may control it. All the talk of fair fights, fair play and having no strategies besides walking head on into battle is for morons. TE is a place for war, but not controlled happy fair war where everything is delightful and pretty and meant to be nice.

You can edit titles I believe for future reference

Hooray 10,000 ☑ ◯ 1,000,000 ☐ x Next goal set

44,259 Attacking + 66,016 Defending = 110,275 Casualties Ranked #26 of 1,741 Nations (1.49%) My casualties slowed down when I hit mach 4 on infra losing ^-^

Meh, not really, you let the trolls win and now they don't have anything to cry themselves to sleep for

Awesomely fun war, I thoroughly enjoyed zetsumei, some very funny stuff he/she said, very respectful, and not afraid to talk as friends rather than enemies (should be promoted to like... co-leader just for this) plus crazypeople in the irc was kind as well

Participation is based on seasonal things as well, and that it takes up more time to effectively play TE then SE, where you can check your nation once a week and collect every 20 days and still be very effective in building. I'd rather keep the flag runners, then recruit a bunch of people who play for a week then quit because they were raided once. But this is just my opinion.

Tablets win!

[quote name='lonewolfe2015' date='13 June 2010 - 09:44 AM' timestamp='1276443873' post='2336179'] Has LE declared war on my nation yet? I peaced out the first raider, attacked the second raider back, and now a third raider hits me while I'm on Pork Shrimp. [/quote] Nothing like the thrill of raiding during war am I right? But waiting for stats, sounds selfish I know, like why don't I do the stats instead of complaining there are none, but I figure since CDT threw the party, they should have to deal with the refreshments （*＾ー゜)

I love it as long as i'm hit...

[quote name='kong' date='09 June 2010 - 01:32 PM' timestamp='1276111947' post='2330488'] Frost, your avatar and signature look like you've been in TDF. Is it true? [/quote] No, I've had relatively (spelling that was a pain) the same interests since way before I ever played CN, much as most of them have, minus a few who just hoped on board out of new found interest or to blend in. Day 6 must have turned into shoe throwing! Except for Umbrella who got hit by the last few rocks ^ - ^

I would like to have the link of my signature point to the declare war on my nation screen for CNTE. Nation ID is 1000028 This points to the screen that reads "Do not attempt to Cheat" http://tournament.cybernations.net/declarewar_form.asp?Nation_ID=1000028&bynation=1000028 So if I removed my nation ID off the end and linked that, would it do it? http://tournament.cybernations.net/declarewar_form.asp?Nation_ID=1000028&bynation= Or am I not even close...?

[quote name='Clash' date='09 June 2010 - 09:08 AM' timestamp='1276096083' post='2330156'] I [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=87180&view=findpost&p=2329447"]corrected you[/url], and very accurately. You can't rearrange them however you want just for your own subjective purposes. [/quote] Exactly, so quit trying. Please, and let's agree to disagree as I never wanted to talk to you in the first place, only Jonboy thank you.

I do understand LE's concern, but I must decline this as these wars do have something to do with LE

I'm trying to fix things up, but Clash is to broken... I think he jumped in this discussion to just call me an idiot and liar :shrugs:

[quote name='Clash' date='08 June 2010 - 08:59 PM' timestamp='1276052361' post='2329593'] They declared themselves one big bloc. That was their decision. One person made the DoW for that bloc. Those are all facts. You can't just make stuff up for yourself and declare it the truth. [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=86546&view=findpost&p=2316928"]Here's an example of you being proven a liar.[/url] You own aliance told you to shut it in that thread. You were an embarrassment to them, since they are NOT liars or blithering idiots. [/quote] How was I lying? A question does not equal a lie. A question cannot equal a lie. A question is how that started, and your refusal to answer it [s]'truthfully'[/s] (you see what I did there, I pulled a Clash, just kidding ^-^), but carrying on, your refusal to answer it is what led to a prolonged debate, in which became a blood bath of this sort going into how I''m a liar and blithering idiot (its like deja vu). I did not agree to stop for their account, but my own. I understand LE doesn't want me to reflect all 54 members of the alliance, in which it doesn't, and never will. I am not making stuff up either, their is 3 DoW's on that post....

[quote name='Clash' date='08 June 2010 - 08:53 PM' timestamp='1276052021' post='2329586'] Yeah, all of you in his bloc must be so proud of your decision to follow this clown. Frostfirefox, you should move to MHA, you'll fit right in. I sure don't think of you as LE. They are a much more sensible and honorable bunch than you've shown yourself on these forums. [/quote] Sensible? Sensible.... hm... are you sure you know the definition to that word? And LE has nothing to do with this. I'm just having a normal debate, I'm not yelling, cussing, accusing. I'm only explaining my standpoint, same as you are. So therefore you are not an honorable Warrior for doing the same thing?

[quote name='Clash' date='08 June 2010 - 08:44 PM' timestamp='1276051453' post='2329574'] They did not post their own threads and they did not make their own DoWS. One big fat one was made for them by the bloc. That bloc acted as a group, not as individuals. Playing semantics doesn't change the facts OR the truth. [/quote] Saves space, time and effort. Why does it matter if they all didn't post their own? Would that of changed the blocs in anyway? Nope. One big fat one was made by Confusion for 2 blocs and The Vault. And you like posting about the facts and the truth. So instead of vaguely saying the words facts and truth, why don't you post some for us all to see? Because honestly, their is only a bunch of perspectives swirling around right now, their are no facts besides the fact (lol cliche) that you.... are a lie. ^-^

[quote name='Clash' date='08 June 2010 - 08:20 PM' timestamp='1276050030' post='2329534'] Sharing a DoW and declaring yourselves a bloc = a bloc. Getting declared on by a bloc =/= by itself a bloc. [/quote] From what I read, they all didn't share a DoW, they did share a post, but a shared DoW would read: Umbrella, Multicolored Cross-X Alliance, Mostly Harmful Alliance, Fark, SWAT, Sovereign Mongers of Uber Greatness, Army of Darkness, Roman Empire and The Vault hereby declare war on The Phoenix Cobras, Pork Shrimp, The Flying Kiwis, RnR, Trollwitch Defense Force and The Warriors Instead of: Umbrella, Multicolored Cross-X Alliance, and Mostly Harmful Alliance hereby Declare War on The Phoenix Cobras; Fark, SWAT, Sovereign Mongers of Uber Greatness, Army of Darkness, and the Roman Empire hereby Declare War on Pork Shrimp, The Flying Kiwis, RnR, and Trollwitch Defense Force; The Vault hereby Declares War on The Warriors. Which contains 3 seperate DoW's shared in a single post. Thank you for reading ^-^ And Jonboy, your inability to answer my comment on truth is not foolishness on my part, I'm just more open minded to my view on things. And yes I knew they were stats, thanks for telling me (just because title says stats, it does not describe the vague statement, of 'his bloc' when there is clearly 2 regardless of your blindness to that. Obvious would of been, MHA, MCXA and Umbrella vs TPC - very worthy try though of perverting the english language.

[quote name='JonBoy16' date='08 June 2010 - 08:07 PM' timestamp='1276049220' post='2329512'] I may have replied sooner had I not needed to spend so much time scratching my head in wonder of what you just said. The truth is a lie? Seriously!?? As far as the bloc goes: If you have been paying attention to this thread you'll notice I'm talking about MHA, MCXA, and Umbrela. Hence the stats (also the topic title which refers to the contents of the message) that are up above. To further answer your second question, that's a pointless question. [/quote] First off, yes the truth is the lie, because truth is based on perspective (what you know and see), thus truth is ever changing, and no one form of truth is final, so therefore, all forms of truth are a lie. And second, I don't know why you are so defensive to me not knowing who his 'current bloc' is. The title is some stats (not helpful) and the subtitle is of the second grudge war (some inside reference i'm supposed to know about?)