andrew734

[quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1280128729' post='2389477'] Well I heard gramlins is being raided. [/quote] thats funny i heard IRON was being fail raided

Congrats Val on the milestone and breaking 1k nukes

yay hippo

yay cheese and sorry to all our former treaty partners, hopefully you understand.

[quote name='Drai' date='19 July 2010 - 01:24 PM' timestamp='1279560234' post='2379004'] Yes Andrew, obviously that logic can be applied to any scenario... Or maybe you could be realistic in your train of thought. Guess that gives you no ground to stand on though. [/quote] actually i was being serious as i expect zak was. I never remember anyone in our forums or elsewhere saying we would defend people we are not tied to.

[quote name='Drai' date='19 July 2010 - 09:24 AM' timestamp='1279545867' post='2378782'] Yes let me search back a few months to please your obviously pretentious denial (or maybe it's real in which case lol). [/quote] wait so let me try this logic did you remember that IRON and MK signed a treaty a couple months ago. Well they did but im too lazy to find a quote to prove it.

17 left with one set to delete tomorrow

[quote name='BlkAK47002' date='17 July 2010 - 12:34 AM' timestamp='1279341239' post='2375482'] But if you are saying that Gre's war against IRON is defensive in general then you are wrong. [/quote] And by war you mean bending over and taking it dry.

good luck to both our allies I wish both partys the best

[quote name='memoryproblems' date='13 July 2010 - 11:41 PM' timestamp='1279078878' post='2370218'] this. if this is a joke or is resolved prior to war, then i will have lost faith in the ability of might to make right. [/quote] Then i can direct you back to the New Gremlins thread and you can realize it again.

[quote name='dvdcchn' date='05 July 2010 - 10:52 PM' timestamp='1278384727' post='2360715'] well handled Paradoxia, best moving forward, we are with you [/quote]

[quote name='Ketther' date='01 July 2010 - 01:04 PM' timestamp='1278003847' post='2356784'] I thought people were talking about being right not about losing stats. Try to attack his reasons. Those pictures are not helping anyone. People burned before Ramirus. Some of them did for a just cause. Kett [/quote] If his position is so right why does he change his path after well over a month of war. It just so happens that he gets destroyed this week. How right it is to protect your pixels.

Forget you TOP. but on a serious note, we will be back up there soon enough.

[quote name='Matthew PK' date='17 June 2010 - 09:38 PM' timestamp='1276825063' post='2341313'] Are you confused about which alliance I am in? None of my leaders are in PM [/quote] TO use your own words READING COMPREHENSION personal message

[quote name='Dave93' date='15 June 2010 - 02:44 AM' timestamp='1276584261' post='2338023'] can we drug test IRON please? [/quote] no i will not pee in any cup you give me

happy birthday DAWN

Thanks for your show of support

thanks for the show of support TBB

[quote name='Schad' date='07 May 2010 - 07:37 PM' timestamp='1273275433' post='2290778'] Well, then, let's say that IRON/DAWN disarm, and Grämlins present terms to which they will not agree. Would Grämlins then allow them to rearm fully before recommencing attacks? If not, the net result is the same...they will have placed IRON/DAWN in an extraordinarily vulnerable position, and then leveraged that advantage in peace negotiations. [/quote] well if you missed half the thread they were arguing that we need to take a weakened position to come to the table in order to start discussion. Which has been denounced as never going to happen by both dvd and mcrabt both councilors of IRON

[quote name='KingSrqt' date='07 May 2010 - 11:29 AM' timestamp='1273246131' post='2290274'] This whole thing truly is fascinating. I know most of GRE avoids these forums so I wonder if they really stand behind Ram or if they are just misinformed to the actual damage they are doing to themselves. [/quote] earlier in the thread around page 60-70 NSO and RIA both sent messages to all members alerting them to this thread and explaining the situation

[quote name='Schad' date='06 May 2010 - 11:22 PM' timestamp='1273202516' post='2289724'] [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=72986]This nation, perhaps?[/url]. They've been sitting at 50 members for a day or two previously. [/quote] yes it was anti viet cong

[quote name='Matthew PK' date='06 May 2010 - 01:05 PM' timestamp='1273165483' post='2289119'] In my opinion they do not deserve to negotiate the terms of their surrender. I don't see the need to compromise with them given the nature of and reason for the conflict. Their reps via the ESA do [b]not[/b] outline or explicitly define culpability. The comments in many threads indicate that they do not, in fact, agree to wrongdoing on their part. In reality, they paid to be released; paid to make the war "go away", if you will. Admission of defeat was meaningless in the ESA because it was obvious to all that IRON was defeated. Give the nature of IRON's actions they did not deserve to negotiate anything. Our friends were ok with the "tradition" of "pay reps, end war" but we're not. They are free to make their own decisions and run their alliances how see fit... but I don't have to agree and that doesn't make the way GRE wants to do things inherently wrong. [/quote] So you are trying to get us to say that we were wrong in declaring on CnG by doing what? sitting there and waiting till its your turn to take the trip on the train to ZI like the rest of your alliance is experiencing? You are no closer to getting your wish of having us "unconditionally surrender" than you were when we signed the easter sunday accords.

Good luck and congrats guys

hail the glorious republic

Broken link to the Forums Color: [color="#FF8C00"]Orange[/color] [quote][color="#2E8B57"][code][url="http://www.iron-command.com/forum/index.php?"][/url][/code][/color] [color="#483D8B"]Independent Republic of Orange Nations[/color](IRON) - [color="#8B0000"]#IRON[/color][/quote]