Jump to content

Kowalski

Members
  • Posts

    1,134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kowalski

  1. Props to Olympus for (slowly) coming out to play.
  2. The last two I could accept, but this is one announcement too far.
  3. Excellent work FOK and GO. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1296933351' post='2620764'] The NPO-DH war is a seperate war not another front. Does this ban have an expirey date? You could turn around in 18 months and come up with another bogus CB to restart the war or just hit them again and call it the same war much like you are calling 2 different wars the same war now. If ARES then entered that war on a MDP you could claim breach or surrender terms. [/quote] The original DoW from Doomhouse stated them as being connected. If those making the declaration of war aren't allowed to determine whether the two are connected, who is? Who has the final say? [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1296934399' post='2620799'] Yes Im serious. If you can claim 2 unrelated wars with 2 seperate groups of alliances started for 2 different reasons 7 days apart are the same war, then you can just claim any future war is a result of this war. [/quote] Good idea, we'll store that away for future use. Might need to clear up the "two separate groups of alliances" thing though, read the original DoW to see that they weren't completely separate. If you happen to disagree then I refer you back to the point above.
  4. [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1296886901' post='2620121'] When did you start speaking on behalf of the Mushroom Kingdom? [/quote] Is that really your best comeback?
  5. [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1296837181' post='2619327'] A casus belli is someones justification for war. DoomHouse/FAN gave their justification in their DoW. Whither [i]you[/i] agree with their justification is up to you but it doesn't take away from the fact that they actually had one. [/quote] Unfortunately it seems that when people say there's no CB it means no CB acceptable to them, and by acceptable to them they mean by their standards and what they'd be prepared to do themselves. So unless the CB is something that the opposite side would be comfortable doing themselves, there is no CB. [quote name='Moe Szyslak' timestamp='1296839490' post='2619358'] Seems to me that if MK and Umbrella were attacking TPF nations without a formal declaration on those nations, then ML had every right to come to their defense with an equally non-existant DoW. Why all the surprise? I fail to see where it's only ok when one side does it. [/quote] Probably for the 967th time in this thread, we know we attacked some TPF nations (along with nations of other alliances) and we know ML had every right to attack us. Nobody has complained about ML doing that or said it's wrong/unfair/immoral/etc. We just decided to do something about it. The problem seems to be that whereas TPF (and others) declined to attack Umbrella and MK back, Umbrella and MK have decided to attack ML back, and because Umbrella and MK reacted to a situation differently than TPF (and others) means that we're hypocrites.
  6. [quote name='Kilkenny' timestamp='1296819246' post='2619149'] Actually that sir is a direct Lie. Blatant and quite undefensable Lie. Find 1 Offensive war from TPF against either MK or Umb. The fact is we declared war on GOONs, not MK. If you wish to attack us for that, fine, they are a treaty partner of yours and it is your right. But you really need ot climb down off the High Horse you are sitting on about how you were attacked by us. [/quote] Try reading properly. I didn't say you had attacked us, I said it isn't our fault that you decided not to retaliate and attack us.
  7. [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1296816804' post='2619137'] Yeah, oops, my bad; I forgot. Still the other three hold true. [/quote] They do; Legion are already mentioned in my last post but add the other three to the list and it still applies.
  8. [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1296815561' post='2619131'] You guys are also providing support for GOONS against Cult of Justitia, The Legion, Kerberos Nexus and us. No declaration of war there either? [/quote] Actually I think Kerberos Nexus declared on MK.
  9. I don't think anyone (who matters) is saying ML can't do what they've done, after all remember we don't use the same antiquated 'rule book' as some of those arguing this, but merely that there are repercussions in doing so. I think it goes against what we stand for to tell someone that they can't do something, we just expect others to do as we do and accept the consequences of it. This is just a recognition of hostilities/acknowledgement of war (note: not a declaration of war) that became necessary when it was made clear that ML's original stance that they were attacking those going rogue (their interpretation) on TPF was untrue and that this was an alliance-wide situation. Yes Umbrella and MK have attacked some nations of alliances that declared on our allies. It isn't a case of double standards as it isn't our fault that TPF, CCC, Legion and ARES haven't posted a recognition of hostilities or acknowledgement of war and attacked us. We attacked those nations, ML attacked us. Just because we're prepared to take it a step further and do what CCC, ARES, Legion and TPF aren't doesn't mean we're butthurt hypocrites, in fact we're doing something about it rather than just crying on the OWF as most others do. Which to be fair ML haven't, it's just those looking to decry Doomhouse as usual.
  10. wF, you may have taken a beating to rival Rodney King, but I doubt your commitment will be forgotten any time soon.
  11. [quote name='Balkan Banania' timestamp='1296648083' post='2616044'] Come on, maybe this wasn’t as eloquent as you would like, but I see it more like a friendly tease than an attempt to discredit Sparta. Planet Bob is going to be in war for a long time, so maybe once a while we can lighten up and exchange some jokes. After all some lighthearted threads can be a good counterbalance to these “open letter” and “where the world is going” threads, they can provide a good mix. [/quote] Yeah I can see that now. I still reserve the right to return fire and mock NV outside of war time when their 15 minutes of fame is over.
  12. Please keep all of your comments away from Umbrella.
  13. [quote name='Ironfist' timestamp='1296647883' post='2616039'] Well it was a little bit of a joke. But he was implying GATO was incompetent because of the chart and... hell I thought this was clear [/quote] It was clear what you were saying.
  14. [quote name='Ironfist' timestamp='1296647269' post='2616034'] I think this is relevant: Top 7 Day Smallest Alliance Gains 1) -3,741,586 Strength Change - [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=New%20Pacific%20Order"]New Pacific Order[/url] 2) -1,793,291 Strength Change - [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Sparta"]Sparta[/url] 3) -1,418,173 Strength Change - [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Multicolored%20Cross-X%20Alliance"]Multicolored Cross-X Alliance[/url] [b]4) -1,365,456 Strength Change - [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Goon%20Order%20Of%20Oppression%20Negligence%20And%20Sadism"]Goon Order Of Oppression Negligence And Sadism[/url][/b] 5) -1,275,676 Strength Change - [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Global%20Alliance%20And%20Treaty%20Organization"]Global Alliance And Treaty Organization[/url] --- Are you calling Sparta incompetent? No wait... GOONS. I meant GOONS. Are you calling GOONS incompetent? [/quote] No I'm pretty sure he was calling GATO incompetent.
  15. If you're going to start threads as jokes then please do keep to each other's forums.
  16. Oh how smug NV and friends can afford to be now, enjoy it while it lasts. Soon we can go back to making threads about 11% aid slot efficiency.
  17. Finally the world has seen the might of BN. o/ Basketball Ninjas
  18. For services to black team trade circles Kirke fully deserves this.
  19. [quote name='Earogema' timestamp='1296463199' post='2612751'] If you think I think this is "wrong" you're being as stupid as I was when I assumed the OP was a goon. It's just sad. [/quote] So you told the OP to stop and said that GOONS having a tough guy image is sad, but if I think that you think that's wrong than I'm sad? I'm afraid you've lost me.
  20. [quote name='Lamuella' timestamp='1296461838' post='2612733'] Holy Ruler is in RIA [/quote] Doesn't matter, all wrongs can be traced back to GOONS and therefore GOONS are to blame. Especially as far as CoJ are concerned.
  21. But...but...MHA are a terrible military alliance, those fighting them should be able to handle them easily apparently.
  22. [quote name='caligula' timestamp='1296450488' post='2612128'] Almost every time. [/quote] I can vouch that this is absolutely true.
  23. [quote name='Markus Wilding' timestamp='1296415351' post='2611343'] http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?search=380486&Extended=1 You were saying? [/quote] We all know you have a small number of nations at war, it's that small amount and the make-up of those nations that are under discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...