Jump to content

Zero-One

Members
  • Posts

    551
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Zero-One

  1. It's like 2007 all over again... Good luck PC... I feel your loss [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/dry.gif[/img]
  2. OPPORTUNISTIC BANDWAGONERS!!! I GUESS MK AREN'T DOING TOO WELL THAT THEY NEED TO CALL IN THEIR LAPDOGS HMMMMMPPPTTTT!!!! [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img]
  3. [quote name='captain america' timestamp='1299548166' post='2656037'] blocs almost always suck. But if you want to go down the road you're travelling BLEU was the best bloc to grace this game. Not only was it, for the most part, based on mutual friendship and the common purpose of uniting the blue team, it could dominate anyone at any time. Though it did have one of the uglier demises of the blocs that have come and gone... [/quote] Who are you trying to fool? BLEU was a terrible bloc
  4. [quote name='lordliam' timestamp='1299119850' post='2650452'] I don't even get what the whole deal with Raman Mew Mew is. [/quote] Post #1639 by Acrux http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=97252&view=findpost&p=2636832
  5. [quote name='Draztikus' timestamp='1298992909' post='2648107'] What is this I don't even [/quote] I, for one, agree with comrade Draz [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif[/img]
  6. Derp.... *Hugs infras and hits peace mode*
  7. [quote name='Weirdgus' timestamp='1298140097' post='2638498'] I really don't understand how you can contradict yourself so many times within your own post. First of all, by comparing the charts of both Raman and his aggressors' from around the 24th of Jan when he got declared on, it would be a fair assumption to affirm that, even though he might have "turtled" by CN standards, he was not inactive at the time. He did daily damage in all (?) other ways possible to his attackers besides via Ground Attacks (which he would have been unlikely to win anyhow, given odds he was up against and his worst tech total etc.). Secondly, you do admit that [i]your side[/i], Doomhouse, [i]was not competent[/i] enough to keep him staggered and out of peace mode. This [i]lack of competence[/i] coming from Doomhouse, and, by association, [i]Umbrella[/i], is easily explained, in your deformed view, with the argument that you did [i]'so well'[/i] in causing his NS to drop that simply nobody was either [i]prepared[/i] or [i][u]competent[/u][/i] enough to declare on him a 3rd war that entire week. Thirdly, your argument to support the above claim of Umbrella/Doomhouse [i][u]competence[/u][/i] is some rather odd, and completely unrelated, affirmation regarding some NPO nations that [i]"have never come out of it (PM) so far"[/i], even though Raman obviously did fight those wars and the use of Peace Mode has nothing to do with the CN accepted use of the term "turtle", as correctly affirmed and proven in posts above this one (even by yourself). In conclusion, it seems you have utterly failed at answering my initial question, how is it that you find pride in being [u]incompetent[/u]? [/quote] I was going to type up a long reply to refute your point as I was one of the 3 that smashed Raman to half of his NS (from 84K to 40K NS) and lobbed off about 10K of his infras, however, this is a propaganda thread so I will keep this short. Take your dribble somewhere else 1) Raman never coordinated with his mate. The other guy did all the attacks himself. Only thing that Raman ever did was sending daily CM, and a nuke or two after his mate had ran out of nukes. The banter we had on IRC about Raman was what inspired the creation of Raman Mew-mew. 2) Honestly, we didn't CARE enough to stagger Raman. I could've posted a link to his nation to request stagger, but I actually felt sorry for Raman. So whatever. Umbrella doesn't have enough nations in his range and GOONS were having their hands full. 3) blah blah blah less talk, more Raman Mew-Mew
  8. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1298097429' post='2638171'] Evil Polaris [/quote] Aye, they're like ankle biters. They do little damage, but sure was annoying as @%#@$
  9. Less talking, more Raman Mew-Mew!!!
  10. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1297524912' post='2630339'] If you're counting total treaties it's 12 for TOP and 12 (as of yesterday) for Invicta (one of which is an [i]ancient[/i] NAP). And TOP has 6 MDP+ whereas Invicta has 5. We can also look at the fact that TOP's seem to, even inside MDP+ only, straddle a line that Invicta's don't. Funnily enough, if TOP dropped or downgraded the two alliances mentioned, they'd suddenly have a very straightforward list. The person who pointed it out was using two different standards for what constitutes a treaty for each alliance to benefit his point; he counted purely military treaties for TOP, and every treaty he could find for Invicta. And...well, everything I said above. Mutual commitments are the ones that bear closer scrutiny, and therein lies the problem. I wouldn't really call you treaty whores myself, but you're grossly misrepresenting his argument. Then again, I guess politically-motivated misrepresentations are par for the course of OWF ettiquette. [/quote] I used Wikipedia to come up with that fact. Non-military treaty does not count. It serves no purpose. If you want to play by that game, TOP has 8 and Invicta has 9 (MDP, ODP, MDoAP). Then again, you're grasping at straws. TOP has less treaties than most alliances. Calling them treaty whore, especially when you yourself has just as much or more, is rather hypocritical. I'm simply pointing out the fact. [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/smug.gif[/img]
  11. [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1297510477' post='2630230'] Perhaps. However, in the war that disbanded Norden Verein, NPO did not take part. A current member of Pandora's Box did. Nobody in Doomhouse though. [/quote] NPO must had never been part of Continuum then [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif[/img] P.S. As a footnote, NoV deserved their beat down and subsequent disbandment more than any alliance that existed on Bob, second only to /b/ [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1297510477' post='2630230'] A lot of alliances have. If you're going to remove every alliance who's disbanded someone from your list of possible treaty partners, you're going to be quite a bit less of a treaty whore than you are now. [/quote] TOP has 8 treaties, Invicta has 10 But really, continue [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/gag.gif[/img]
  12. [quote name='pezstar' timestamp='1297399619' post='2628917'] Shut the hell up, Grub. [/quote] Don't let her talk you down like that Grub. Tell her to go back to the kitchen and make you a sammich or something. I support you100% in this endeavor. [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif[/img]
  13. Jenko [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img][img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img] Sky [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img][img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img] [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/mad.gif[/img] on that Timberland guy
  14. [quote name='AAAAAAAAAAGGGG' timestamp='1297216841' post='2626389'] Raman-mew-mew war option is missing [/quote] TSRH! I refuse to vote without this option Ramen Mew-Mew War FTW!!!
  15. Guess who's back

    Back again

    Louisa's back

    Tell a friend

  16. [quote name='AlmightyGrub' timestamp='1297226298' post='2626591'] Get in line scumbag. [/quote] Thank you Grub. Without you, this war doesn't happen [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img] I hope you're enjoying seeing Polar burn as much as I am [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/ehm.gif[/img]
  17. You want to know what I think? Crymson and Sponge posting in the same thread and not trolling each other [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif[/img]
  18. [quote name='The MVP' timestamp='1297120674' post='2624640'] If you can't accept your alliance at its worst, you do not deserve it at its best. [/quote] It pains me greatly, but I agree... with... *arrgg* with....*grimmace in pain*....... MVP [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/dry.gif[/img]
  19. [quote name='Louisa' timestamp='1297072469' post='2623869'] I am very happy that I can once more fight alongside TOP as their liberation forces charge ahead, soon to cleanse the field of heathens. The Quiziotle Defense Force thanks you for this, and promises never to forget the sacrifices we all make in the crusade against the oppressive NADC [/quote] You've been missed [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img] <== Ice
  20. [quote name='bigwoody' timestamp='1297020090' post='2622437'] To be fair, they pretty much have openly admitted that they are attacking NPO for the lulz. [/quote] Where did you get that? NPO were chomping at the bit to jump in as soon as the conditions are favorable to them. You would be a damn fool if you thought NPO were sitting innocently in the corner signing kumbayah. Spare us the dribble.
  21. Evil Argent!! [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/awesome.gif[/img]
  22. [quote name='ace072199' timestamp='1296782231' post='2618470'] NICE NUKE, I would hate to be on the other end of that... Wait a minute, Oh crap!!! [/quote] I like this chap [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/lol1.gif[/img] That's the spirit! Good luck, both of you
×
×
  • Create New...