sammykhalifa

It's not the best thread, but at the same time it isn't the worst thread either. You gotta give it that. The "B-" of the thread world.

It's all relative. You haven't read the other alliance announcements/arguments, have you?

Neither here nor there, really. Kind of so-so.

Nice effort either way. Thanks.

Haven't most wars been deleted?

I blame Hetman.

Interesting. Just curious . . . why do some alliance have the stop-sign shape?

Cutting through all the garbage propaganda and rah-rahing (which many people can't seem to let go of despite this supposedly being an OOC forum) and looking at how things are going, it seems to me that there will really be no clear-cut winner on a macro level.

Haha. "Everyone's biased except for me!"

Come on, you're terrible. Admit it.

I never said that the NS model is that great, but that's what we have. And looking at the NS model of losses and calling it even . . . well, it just isn't. That's what people are doing here.

I don't think NS is the best way to judge this, but looking at NS no it's not similar amount of damage. If I have ten apples and someone takes one away, that really sucks. But it doesn't suck nearly as much as if someone had three apples and someone took one away. Now I think your side's doing much better than that (and your NS losses will slow as infra dries up); but in terms of what these charts are looking at, it is not. It's not hard to figure out who would run out of apples first if things continued unchanged (they won't).

But if the losses are near equal in raw numbers, that's a larger percentage DH's overall strength as they are the smaller side. Of course, I'd also say that DH nations for the most part have a higher "floor" per tech numbers. I don't know if total losses are very useful one way or the other, but it's interesting to look at.

As an uninvolved outsider to the whole thing, I thought it was some vague MK reference, tbh.

Best of luck after your rocky start, sir.

Deletion sucks. I don't know why anyone would use that for propaganda.

I accidentally spied a guy's cruise missiles the other day. The Commander-in-chief may or may not have been drinking at the time. Officials will neither confirm nor deny that report.

never mind. that wasn't really fair.

Somehow that seems unlikely to me. I wish people could (just for this thread) stop all the macho chest-puffing to impartially discuss what's a pretty interesting war.

Everyone I have fought has been absolutely cool and fun. It's been a nice change.

Yeah, too bad only one side of this war has anyone with warchests and such, eh Yevgheni?

Yesterday. Haha. I really don't know.

It has the same point as anything else.

While I hope this war mixes up the current power structure which I think can almost never be a bad thing, let's not paint pre-karma days as anything other than what they were. [In-game (not talking about all of this personal stuff)] there's not even a comparison between then and now. Of course, many of the people responsible for that nonsense aren't even around any more.

Oh, I hope so.