keenu Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 (edited) [center][img]http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/7253/mhanpo.png[/img][/center] We are still comparing NPO to MHA? They didn't pay reps, and look at our growth rates. Edited December 21, 2010 by keenu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingEsus Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Watching the handbags at dawn between Lord Strider and Brennan takes me back to the good old days. /sigh. Nice article. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewPoseidon Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Always a good read, I gotta admit. Early congrats on getting back to #1 too. Try not to let NSO get you knocked back down to 9mil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yevgeni Luchenkov Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Interesting read. I appreciated the mention. What can I say, I learned diplomacy by watching you guys over the years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlkAK47_002 Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 [quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1292899915' post='2547410'] Your focus on us as your main enemy is amusing! [/quote] Right back at ya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Strider Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 [quote name='Geoffron X' timestamp='1292895886' post='2547334'] More nukes, more experience, better morale, less ghosts. [/quote] MHA has More tech, more nations, More top nations (with a quick glance), and your morale statement is bias. Either way discounting MHA just because you think you are better than them is silly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caligula Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 This is quite amusing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 (edited) [quote name='caligula' timestamp='1292951804' post='2548441']This is quite amusing.[/quote] Yes, unfortunately a lot of my Comrades failed for a not very well intelligently placed bait and this turned into NPO-MHA comparison thing. I would like to think that members of both alliances believe in victory in such a hypothetical war for their side, but ultimately who can really say how it would go as it goes beyond simple math and into the realm of dedication. Anyway, hopefully this sidetrack could be put to rest now. Edited December 21, 2010 by Branimir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Nice read Pacifica. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Nice read Pacifica. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonytheTiger Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Great work on the stats Pacifica. I would love to see TOPs stats included though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodKing I Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 [quote name='Lord Strider' timestamp='1292878708' post='2546970'] I wouldn't be surprised if they lost. MHA is no joke, yo. MHA has More tech, more nations, More top nations (with a quick glance), and your morale statement is bias. Either way discounting MHA just because you think you are better than them is silly. [/quote] Good Lord, get off MHA's hind teat, already... NPO Comrades! Admirable Akbar said it best, "it's a trap!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.