King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) o/ Coalition of Cowards \o TPF is really lucky to have you guys as allies, I mean you wait 6 days to finally come to there "Rescue" 1. after 6 days it's not much of a rescue really more of a "We'll help you drag on a few more days but your going to go down either way" and 2. It's not much of a rescue when you have almost as many Aggressive wars (out of your 2,000 or so nations) as TPF does. But then again Pixels > Friends right? And I noticed no ones declared on RoK yet? Scared of there allies. And when I say allies I dont mean like you lot, you see they'll actually come to RoK's defense, unlike some people I know. In most of your DoW's you said "let loose the dogs of War" probably should've edited that to dog of war considering most of you have 1 or 2 nations fighting, o/ Peace Mode Warriors. And quit saying "yeah well the 6 days was all strategy, and we put most of our nations in peace mode as another strategy" Being a coward isn't a strategy, no matter how you put it. Just some quick stats Anyways I wish you luck Coalition of Cowards with your Symbolic War. Edited January 2, 2010 by King Mathers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalabac Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) This reminds me of a story. At work, this fat guy who worked there came in with skinny jeans on. The cashier said "why are you wearing skinny jeans?". Obviously owned and reeling from the blow, he went into defense mechanism mode and started putting a badass act on and throwing insults around. The clearly owned side (who thought they would have a curbstomp) are now the ones outnumbered. The tables have turned and they will try to do the tough guy thing really loudly. EDIT: From what I can tell, \m/ is the worst offender for the whole internet tough guy thing. Apparently they think they are big punk rockers and are crazy tough mayhem causers who the other nerdy conformist alliances fear. Edited January 2, 2010 by Kalabac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) From what I can tell, \m/ is the worst offender for the whole internet tough guy thing. Apparently they think they are big punk rockers and are crazy tough mayhem causers who the other nerdy conformist alliances fear. No we just don't take the game seriously enough to care enough whether or not we get put into anarchy or if we lose a war. We play the game as it should be played, to have fun. I'm sorry the people who get way to into it get offended by us just joking around and have fun with the it all. Edited January 2, 2010 by King Mathers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalabac Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 No we just don't take the game seriously enough to care enough whether or not we get put into anarchy or if we lose a war. We play the game as it should be played, to have fun. I'm sorry the people who get way to into it get offended by us just joking around and have fun with the it all. dude chill i didnt mean the skinny jeans thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 lol, wow. I explained something too you dude, wouldn't really call that me getting mad but ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nizzle Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 We all remember \m/ and your epic war fighting... No one missed you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxodi Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 No. This is the worst topic ever. Cheap shots that ignore realities do nothing but piss people off; theres other ways to have lulz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 No one missed you. We really didn't expect them too, which is why we came back. To make sure everyone remembered why they didn't, and no one will ever will miss us again because \m/ is here to stay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Diorno Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Jack Diorno walks in, listens to the conversation, then doubles over in laughter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 No. This is the worst topic ever.Cheap shots that ignore realities do nothing but piss people off; theres other ways to have lulz. Everything I posted was true, CC is to scared to attack RoK because of their allies, the only reason they waited 6 days to fight is because they were scared, and it makes them cowards for doing it. Now we can debate all night whether or not the whole Peace Mode thing is strategy or not so I'm not even going to get into that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentkiller Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) Best topic ever? Damn, the peace mode argument might have worked last war, but it's pretty hilarious right now considering both sides right now are "peace mode warriors". Although you seem like an ill informed poster and I am sure you don't represent the general mindset of your alliance. Edited January 2, 2010 by silentkiller Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nizzle Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 We really didn't expect them too, which is why we came back. To make sure everyone remembered why they didn't, and no one will ever will miss us again because \m/ is here to stay. Good, now collect the rest of CN's failures so we can disregard you all at once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genius15 Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 i find my self kinda siding with TPF for the following reason: i have read the wiki on this war and many posts on the war. from what i gather Athens and friends are getting all pissy because of something that happened many many MONTHS ago. im not saying that TPF was right, just that Athens and them should've done all of this BS back then, not now. so here's my question. WHY THE F'n HELL are you doin this BS NOW?????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Good, now collect the rest of CN's failures so we can disregard you all at once. we would but tbh we really wouldn't want you to come with us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alyster Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Lol, \m/ is already crying. At this update I bet most people were sleeping off the hangover still. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Lol, \m/ is already crying.At this update I bet most people were sleeping off the hangover still. Wouldn't call it crying... in fact I wouldn't call it anything like that. I simply said. Why the hell won't you attack RoK, and your a coward for taking so long on the war. Then I posted some stats on how they were "coming to the rescue" with 22 whole people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerichoholic Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 i find my self kinda siding with TPF for the following reason: i have read the wiki on this war and many posts on the war. from what i gather Athens and friends are getting all pissy because of something that happened many many MONTHS ago. im not saying that TPF was right, just that Athens and them should've done all of this BS back then, not now. so here's my question. WHY THE F'n HELL are you doin this BS NOW?????? We just learned about this now. If TPF had come clean about it at the end of Karma I doubt any of this would've happened. They might've had extra reps, but they wouldn't be down 35% in alliance strength. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genius15 Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 We just learned about this now.If TPF had come clean about it at the end of Karma I doubt any of this would've happened. They might've had extra reps, but they wouldn't be down 35% in alliance strength. thank you thats the kind of answer ive been wanting to hear Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atanatar Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) To a degree, Mathers has a point. Despite the massive wave of Alliance war decla rations, and the strategic wording of several of them to exclude Rok, followed by the underwhelming nation to nation attacks despite several DoW's being made well before update, it does seem to portray your alliances in a somewhat comically bad light. How ever, I believe I have a good idea of the real  reasoning behind this wave of DoW's, I would just like to point out that it matters very little what \m/ thinks about it, it matters how CN overall views it. And to others in this thread, If this would have been made in Alliance Affairs a nd made by a member of \m/ government, you would be right in assuming this was \m/'s official stance. How ever, since it was made instead in World Affairs, wet her gov or not, it is clearly the views of one person. How ever, since the only r esponses you have all seemed to have muster so far seems to deflect from the topi c at hand, perhaps Mathers hit closer to home than I thought. In that case, o/ Mathers. Edited January 2, 2010 by Atanatar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 To a degree, Mathers has a point. Despite the massive wave of Alliance war declarations, and the strategic wording of several of them to exclude Rok, followed b y the under whelming nation to nation attacks despite several DoW's being made well before update, it does seem to protray your alliances in a  somewhat comically bad light. How ever, I believe I have a good idea of the rea l  reasoning behind this wave of DoW's, I would just like to point out that it matters very little what \m/ thinks about it, it matters how CN overall views it. And to others in this thread, If this would have been made in Alliance Affairs a nd made by a member of \m/ government, you would be right in assuming this was \m/'s official stance. How ever, since it was made instead in World Affairs, wet her gov or not, it is clearly the views of one person. How ever, since the only r esponses you have all seemed to have muster so far seems to deflect from the top i c at hand, perhaps Mathers hit closer to home than I thought. In that case, o/ Mathers. That was a miracle I never thought would happen lol. But you do have a point on the whole "how CN overall views it" I disagree with it and hell most if not all of \m/ disagrees with it but you do have a point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keres Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Yes... o/ Declaring during Negotiations in true Hegemony Style o/ Making TPF sound like victims even if they attacked first anyways, I think ill go be sick now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Best topic ever? Damn, the peace mode argument might have worked last war, but it's pretty hilarious right now considering both sides right now are "peace mode warriors". Although you seem like an ill informed poster and I am sure you don't represent the general mindset of your alliance. theres a difference, a small amount of our members are in peace mode. Where as the majority of theirs is in peace mode. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genius15 Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 lemme guess on your side, the nations that are in peace mode are giving aid to the nations that are in war mode Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mathers Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 lemme guess on your side, the nations that are in peace mode are giving aid to the nations that are in war mode Not really, I mean yeah theres some here and there but for the most part they're all tech deals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meer Republic Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) This level of insight was why \m/ always sucked at wars that either lasted more than 3 days or were remotely even. theres a difference, a small amount of our members are in peace mode. Where as the majority of theirs is in peace mode. Really? Your own chart shows that near enough 80% of the :super warriors who don't care about pixels" in \m/ are in peace mode. Edited January 2, 2010 by Meercats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.