Sargun II Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 (edited) Map is on a stable link now. http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/5729/mrpworld2.png <--- edit: no edits were done to this map from the previous one, it's just on a new link. don't !@#$%* about X not being on it or Y being misspelled Edited November 18, 2009 by Sargun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Quoting from Marquis Chris 1's thread, this is why wars need to be planned because chances are you would not cooperate to create a fair and productive war. All that would result is someone quitting and taking the other's land and pages upon pages of OOC slander, !@#$%*ing and complaining. Planning wars will allow for better story, better quality and a more integrated community. In all, it makes for better RP because it reduces the amount of random wars and the complaints and OOC rants that ensue.EDIT: And example is the war going on in Finland right now. That is a great example of how things are supposed to go down. There is still the whole just saying no period. That just renders wars useless. And that war is a conquest of an unoccupied area. Not a state vs State one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lutai Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 ok can i claim china,Mongolia,and Korea then and form the Lu empire if im allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 So yeah How would that work? Quoting from Marquis Chris 1's thread, this is why wars need to be planned because chances are you would not cooperate to create a fair and productive war. All that would result is someone quitting and taking the other's land and pages upon pages of OOC slander, !@#$%*ing and complaining. Planning wars will allow for better story, better quality and a more integrated community. In all, it makes for better RP because it reduces the amount of random wars and the complaints and OOC rants that ensue.EDIT: And example is the war going on in Finland right now. That is a great example of how things are supposed to go down. There is still the whole just saying no period. That just renders wars useless. And that war is a conquest of an unoccupied area. Not a state vs State one I don't believe you are permitted to say 'no' outright, but the attacker does have to plan out the war with you to some degree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnost Dural Posted November 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 I don't believe you are permitted to say 'no' outright, but the attacker does have to plan out the war with you to some degree. There has to be a balance between both styles. On the one hand, you cannot just declare war and invade with no plot, plan or contacting the other person. Likewise, if someone wants to war with you, you guys need to come to some sort of consensus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 I don't believe you are permitted to say 'no' outright, but the attacker does have to plan out the war with you to some degree. oh Thats ok then. I dont mind the planning, its just the whole saying no part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 There has to be a balance between both styles. On the one hand, you cannot just declare war and invade with no plot, plan or contacting the other person. Likewise, if someone wants to war with you, you guys need to come to some sort of consensus. I did contact him... After I posted it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnost Dural Posted November 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 oh Thats ok then. I dont mind the planning, its just the whole saying no part. If someone says no, they should contact a GM, and the GM will decide the outcome of the attacks or something. There just cannot be a plain "No". Someone, somehow will decide the results, as long as you present a plan for the war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Can I have California, Nevada, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Utah, and Idaho, please? >:3 Oh, and label it the Californian Republic, if that's permitted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnost Dural Posted November 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Can I have California, Nevada, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Utah, and Idaho, please? >:3Oh, and label it the Californian Republic, if that's permitted. Eh, California is big as it is, don't you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Eh, California is big as it is, don't you think? Bigger is better. Oh man...I'll have to think up of a DoE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Bigger is better. Oh man...I'll have to think up of a DoE. Just take California. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Just take California. But....but.....but... Ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakwars Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 ok can i claim china,Mongolia,and Korea then and form the Lu empire if im allowed. already claimed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 already claimed wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maicke Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 already claimed He decided not to play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakwars Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 oh, did Yuan dissolve? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnost Dural Posted November 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 I've just spoken to Vox, the CNRP Game Master and he has said that since I have created and developed this new RP community, that I am allowed to appoint three GM's specifically for Medieval RP. With that in mind, I spoke with both Sargun and Sarah Tintagyl and they have both agreed to take up the positions of GM. I will serve as the 3rd GM. Any questions, concerns or comments about MRP or anything of that nature should be directed at them. Should one of the GM's be removed, I will appoint a successor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingChris Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 So what should be the RL:MRP time ratio? I think a RL monthhas to be at least three years considering the speed of movements and communications back then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bacharth Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 So what should be the RL:MRP time ratio? I think a RL monthhas to be at least three years considering the speed of movements and communications back then. Time will probably be random, like it is in CNRP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lutai Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 good i hope it is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 Sargun, you missed me. I'm the Kingdom of Ukraine, yo (occupying the namesake's land). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 So what should be the RL:MRP time ratio? I think a RL monthhas to be at least three years considering the speed of movements and communications back then. Time will probably be random, like it is in CNRP. good i hope it is While I would prefere a solid time scale, it probably is best if it remains fluid, open to interpretation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 edit: no edits were done to this map from the previous one, it's just on a new link. don't !@#$%* about X not being on it or Y being misspelled damnit v the king Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnost Dural Posted November 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 Oh my god, my eyes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.