Druss the Legend Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I must admit, that is a clever way to hide what he really meant when he made that statement. I'll give you an A for that one . So, the truth is now a clever way to hide something? Very Enlightening! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooksland Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Sorry there hoss, I ain't looking to duel today. I may of mentioned it eariler, but got like a buck fifty in money on hand. Though, if you're game in say a week, send me a PM. I'll tell you flat out what I'm doing and that is baiting IS to pick a real fight, a fun fight, a fight they're not guaranteed to win. Now why did I just come out and say that? Simple, because every second they spend not picking that fight is every second I get to call them spineless. And they ain't gonna take me up on the offer. Don't worry, I know exactly what you are doing. You want IS to attack you that way you have VE to come and back you up, so it because a fight that you will win. On the other hand you can attack IS, but if that happens then I doubt VE will have your back when IS's allies come to their back, so that will be a fight that you will lose. So please do not call some people spineless if you fall in the same boat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 How about do what we've all been saying: Attack IS or shut up. Why don't you make me shut up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Meanĕ Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I find it hilarious to see people touting how raids have to be a certain way. Raids are done however the nations doing so desires, not according to some code. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Then its not a raid, its war. Ummmmmmmmmmm, I'm fairly sure IS can make its own definitions for its raiding policy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Both of you please blow each other up already. I dont know what was worse all the "Whaaa those terms are harsh"/"when will NPO surrender" during the war or the silly shens coming out now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Ok, this isn't worth my time to read 15+ pages of this. It'd be quicker just to skip the pointless banter after the OP and just state what I think; Crimson Guard has no treaties. Therefore, Crimson Guard is open to be raided. That's a fact that everyone knows and accepts when it comes to alliances - if you don't have a treaty where someone must or could defend you, you will be raided. Simple as that. Internet Superheroes tech raided an "alliance" under 15 members, with no treaties or protectors. Now, I can guarantee if any other alliance had done that, nobody would be making such a stink about this. However, it's Internet Superheroes who initiated these raids and we all know how much the rest of Digiterria loves IS. Which makes this whole ordeal by CG and others who oppose IS to be excessively hypocritical because you don't care about CG, you just want a chance to see IS be attacked and "put in their place". All you're doing is trying to capitalize on people's emotions for vengeance. When it comes down to it, it is your fault you decided to neglect the wonderful art of diplomacy by not getting yourselves a protector or an M/ODP partner. Pinning the blame and misplaced rage at Internet Superheroes doesn't hide the fact that you failed to play politics in a political world. You reap what you sow by doing that, and frankly, shouldn't complain. But I won't stop you, the tears are quite delicious. As for issuing an "ultimatum" to Internet Superheroes, LOL. You have accepted peace with them already from what I can see, but now you want reparations? Why? You already agreed to peace with IS after they sent you the peace offers. Oh wait, I remember - All you're doing is trying to capitalize on people's emotions for vengeance. So as far as I am concerned, this is over. If you decide to attack Internet Superheroes for ignoring your complaints and grievances you will get to meet some pretty RAD people shortly after. You can count on it. /zimmer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 So, the truth is now a clever way to hide something? Very Enlightening! No, its not the truth, its just a clever way to hide what she really meant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Ummmmmmmmmmm, I'm fairly sure IS can make its own definitions for its raiding policy. Well there's yours and then there's Planet Bob's definition of a tech raid which is GA's only... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 (edited) Why don't you make me shut up? Because I think it's quite flattering to play this backwards "cat and mouse" game where everyone plays around about hitting IS, then when someone does it they get chewed up by their allies. But please, do be an annoyance for anyone who argues for the sake of lolitics. Well there's yours and then there's Planet Bob's definition of a tech raid which is GA's only... I'll remember that if you ever make an alliance and don't want anyone infringing on YOUR sovereignty. Edited August 20, 2009 by Rey the Great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderJerusalem Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I have a manhattan project now. It's beautiful. I look forward to nuking pink sphere nations with it. You won't be alone brother I really wish my alliance allowed raiding now, I would love to tag team some pink nations with you. Do it for me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Meanĕ Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Well there's yours and then there's Planet Bob's definition of a tech raid which is GA's only... I never knew you spoke for planet bob. Must have missed that meeting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druss the Legend Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 (edited) No, its not the truth, its just a clever way to hide what she really meant. I do believe it is the Truth. I have talked to many people who when they Raid, They are raiding for Land, and Not for Tech. Sakura must be one of those players who needs land more than they need the tech. You can take the High Ground all you want and say that they just want to kill CG, when all they really wanted was some discounted land and tech. Well Said Emperor Marx, Well Said. RAD <3 IS Edited August 20, 2009 by Druss the Legend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I never knew you spoke for planet bob. Must have missed that meeting. I don't I was just basing it from the majority of people posting here not in IS or PWNAGE on what a tech raid is... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Ok, this isn't worth my time to read 15+ pages of this. It'd be quicker just to skip the pointless banter after the OP and just state what I think;Crimson Guard has no treaties. Therefore, Crimson Guard is open to be raided. That's a fact that everyone knows and accepts when it comes to alliances - if you don't have a treaty where someone must or could defend you, you will be raided. Simple as that. Internet Superheroes tech raided an "alliance" under 15 members, with no treaties or protectors. Now, I can guarantee if any other alliance had done that, nobody would be making such a stink about this. However, it's Internet Superheroes who initiated these raids and we all know how much the rest of Digiterria loves IS. Which makes this whole ordeal by CG and others who oppose IS to be excessively hypocritical because you don't care about CG, you just want a chance to see IS be attacked and "put in their place". All you're doing is trying to capitalize on people's emotions for vengeance. When it comes down to it, it is your fault you decided to neglect the wonderful art of diplomacy by not getting yourselves a protector or an M/ODP partner. Pinning the blame and misplaced rage at Internet Superheroes doesn't hide the fact that you failed to play politics in a political world. You reap what you sow by doing that, and frankly, shouldn't complain. But I won't stop you, the tears are quite delicious. As for issuing an "ultimatum" to Internet Superheroes, LOL. You have accepted peace with them already from what I can see, but now you want reparations? Why? You already agreed to peace with IS after they sent you the peace offers. Oh wait, I remember - All you're doing is trying to capitalize on people's emotions for vengeance. So as far as I am concerned, this is over. If you decide to attack Internet Superheroes for ignoring your complaints and grievances you will get to meet some pretty RAD people shortly after. You can count on it. /zimmer Also, this can be considered the official stance of RAD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2burnt2eat Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I never knew you spoke for planet bob. Must have missed that meeting. He spokes for the majority of us who actually know how to raid. Whereas you and company rewrite the definition of raiding to defend yourselves. Anyway you spin it, What IS is doing is underhanded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King DrunkWino Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Don't worry, I know exactly what you are doing. You want IS to attack you that way you have VE to come and back you up, so it because a fight that you will win. On the other hand you can attack IS, but if that happens then I doubt VE will have your back when IS's allies come to their back, so that will be a fight that you will lose. So please do not call some people spineless if you fall in the same boat. Well, considering I'm not going around and starting wars, no tech raids, no it's a war, no it's a tech raid with little alliances I can beat rather easily and boasting about how much I love fun wars, I'm fairly certain I am on a radically different boat. I can see IS and their little pink dingy floating around somewhere off the starboard if that helps though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 (edited) I have talked to many people who when they Raid, They are raiding for Land, and Not for Tech. 16:44 %Londo • did you raid NOAH ReytheRAD 16:44 %Londo • lol 16:45 %ReytheRAD • I hit the leader I think 16:45 %Londo • NOAH didn't take it to the OWF though 16:45 %ReytheRAD • That's irrelevant 16:46 %Londo • also that raid wasn't politically motivated 16:46 %ReytheRAD • someone had to notice 16:46 %Londo • well yeah 16:46 %ReytheRAD • all raids are tl;dr "you're smaller, I want money" 16:46 %Londo • I wanted land lolsupwiththat Edited August 20, 2009 by Rey the Great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkenstein Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I think Emperor Marx said it well but CG you really do reap what you sow. Hopefully you will take this as a learning experience and get a decent protectorate to prevent something like this from happening again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reccesion Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I think Emperor Marx said it well but CG you really do reap what you sow. Hopefully you will take this as a learning experience and get a decent protectorate to prevent something like this from happening again. I'm assuming you haven't read this entire thread, now have you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I think Emperor Marx said it well but CG you really do reap what you sow. Hopefully you will take this as a learning experience and get a decent protectorate to prevent something like this from happening again. I'm sorry what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I'm assuming you haven't read this entire thread, now have you? What's the point? It's just going to be you and others puffing their chests. Worthless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druss the Legend Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Also, this can be considered the official stance of RAD. I must say, RAD has one RADical official stance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordAkanata Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I'm assuming you haven't read this entire thread, now have you? Not to goad you, since I'm on your side on this, but you probably should be posting a DoW soon before people stop taking you seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Meanĕ Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I don't I was just basing it from the majority of people posting here not in IS or PWNAGE on what a tech raid is... Do you realize how many people are on planet bob? Calling some replies in a forum as the majority is rediculous. Nations will raid how they desire to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.