Corinan Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Which lesson is that?I hope it's an embroidery lesson. God I love Arts and Crafts. "Whining 101." Starfox will be the instructor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cairna Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 This redundant practice of making FA/political moves simply to incite not debate, but useless insults back and for is growing tiresome. This is a GAME. Perhaps you have forgotten what that means? Means you use the basis of the game to amuse yourself, whether it be war, or snide comments on the forums. I've learned a long time ago that the sort of argument you're making is not only ineffective, it's just wrong and if it's all you have to fall back on, maybe you should learn to live with it. As for the general subject of this war, well okay I guess it's cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 So, tell me, as a member of NSO, *non-quotable-snip*This redundant practice of making FA/political moves simply to incite not debate, but useless insults back and for is growing tiresome. This is a GAME. Perhaps you have forgotten what that means? Yes, I'm sure other people have mentioned this many times by now in this thread alone *non-quotable-snip* [ooc]I actually act this way in real life. If you can't take this stuff light-heartedly and make a few dry cracks, you need to take a step back and relax.[/ooc] If I were in RAD and acting this way, would you still be up in arms over it, or would you be holding your sides due to the agony caused by your sycophantic guffaws? One does wonder about the numerous double standards this situation has revealed folks possessing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterof9puppets Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 [ooc]I actually act this way in real life. If you can't take this stuff light-heartedly and make a few dry cracks, you need to take a step back and relax.[/ooc] If I were in RAD and acting this way, would you still be up in arms over it, or would you be holding your sides due to the agony caused by your sycophantic guffaws?One does wonder about the numerous double standards this situation has revealed folks possessing. If RAD was the one that had their heads up their ***, I'm sure RAD would be the one taking Vesalius' heat. However, it is not RAD, it is you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 If RAD was the one that had their heads up their ***, I'm sure RAD would be the one taking Vesalius' heat.However, it is not RAD, it is you. You'll excuse me for finding that unlikely, considering the fact he cited my alliance as a motive for my general "attitude". Moreover, I cant help but note the irony of you all defending RAD when frankly they dont really need, nor are they asking for it. I'd say you folks should consider butting out, but that would elicit a rather annoying chorus of "OMG CENSURE!!!!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesalius Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 As for the general subject of this war, well okay I guess it's cool. You guess it's cool? RAD played a joke, albeit a fairly bad idea, but the NSO reaction is very extreme. Reminiscent of a school expelling a girl for "Possession of a Controlled Substance" for having birth control. Yes, it is technically against a rule, and yes they technically have the right to suspend her, but anyone with half a brain can tell that's morally wrong and extreme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 You guess it's cool? RAD played a joke, albeit a fairly bad idea, but the NSO reaction is very extreme. Reminiscent of a school expelling a girl for "Possession of a Controlled Substance" for having birth control. Yes, it is technically against a rule, and yes they technically have the right to suspend her, but anyone with half a brain can tell that's morally wrong and extreme. There are no morals in Cybernations. Get with the program Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 You'll excuse me for finding that unlikely, considering the fact he cited my alliance as a motive for my general "attitude". Moreover, I cant help but note the irony of you all defending RAD when frankly they dont really need, nor are they asking for it.I'd say you folks should consider butting out, but that would elicit a rather annoying chorus of "OMG CENSURE!!!!" Good, I'm glad you are able to recognize the right others besides yourself have of expressing their opinions here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterof9puppets Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 You'll excuse me for finding that unlikely, considering the fact he cited my alliance as a motive for my general "attitude". I'm pretty sure that may because the general state of mind I've found to be of NSO is that of an $@!, while of RAD is a goof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 (edited) Good, I'm glad you are able to recognize the right others besides yourself have of expressing their opinions here. Im an !@#$%^&, not a tyrant. I'm pretty sure that may because the general state of mind I've found to be of NSO is that of an $@!, while of RAD is a goof. So, once again, would you still be trash talking RAD for allowing me to hypothetically act like that as a member? Or would you all be laughing sycophantically at my wittiness? Edited August 16, 2009 by Chron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 You guess it's cool? RAD played a joke, albeit a fairly bad idea, but the NSO reaction is very extreme. Reminiscent of a school expelling a girl for "Possession of a Controlled Substance" for having birth control. Yes, it is technically against a rule, and yes they technically have the right to suspend her, but anyone with half a brain can tell that's morally wrong and extreme. What about people with a whole brain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesalius Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 You'll excuse me for finding that unlikely, considering the fact he cited my alliance as a motive for my general "attitude". Moreover, I cant help but note the irony of you all defending RAD when frankly they dont really need, nor are they asking for it.I'd say you folks should consider butting out, but that would elicit a rather annoying chorus of "OMG CENSURE!!!!" Ah, so it's wrong for anyone else to defend a moral standard they feel is being violated? If RAD were being ***** about this situation, they would be receiving just as much heat. However, they're not. So guess what? I'm not giving them any grief. I cited your alliance as being full of people that regularly degrade decent debate to flame storms. I like debate, I'd love to see more civil debates, so please, do some of here a favor, and quit being an ***. (and no, I'm not saying or implying NSO are the only ****** here) I see no double standard in that, simple falsehoods presented by yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 What about people with a whole brain? No one who reads that post leaves it with their entire brain intact, so your question is rendered moot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesalius Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 What about people with a whole brain? Should be about the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterof9puppets Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 So, once again, would you still be trash talking RAD for allowing me to hypothetically act like that as a member? Or would you all be laughing sycophantically at my wittiness? I've already stated my opinion on that matter; if RAD allowed all of their members to act like asses, no, I would not be taking their side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 (edited) Ah, so it's wrong for anyone else to defend a moral standard they feel is being violated?If RAD were being ***** about this situation, they would be receiving just as much heat. However, they're not. So guess what? I'm not giving them any grief. Were not being "*****" about this either, so I dont see what standard youre basing your clearly well-researched findings upon.I cited your alliance as being full of people that regularly degrade decent debate to flame storms. I like debate, I'd love to see more civil debates, so please, do some of here a favor, and quit being an ***. (and no, I'm not saying or implying NSO are the only ****** here) Decent debate? Kid, I think you just demonstrated for everyone to see just how completely oblivious to what you're talking about with this phrase right here.Civil Debate? [ooc]Not in my OWF![/ooc] I see no double standard in that, simple falsehoods presented by yourself. So, then you should be able to answer the question which questions whether or not you are having those double standards? I can pretty much guarantee that we NSO members would still be acting the same regardless of what our AA is. Would you be just as critical? And making such blatantly wrong-faced assumptions and statements?I've already stated my opinion on that matter; if RAD allowed all of their members to act like asses, no, I would not be taking their side. Define asses for the class. Please. I would love to see your definition, and the mental gymnastics it would take to have it apply to only us. Tell me how close I am: Asses (Ah-zuz) n.: Member of an alliance lead by Ivan Moldavi. Edited August 16, 2009 by Chron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 I've already stated my opinion on that matter; if RAD allowed all of their members to act like asses, no, I would not be taking their side. Well they apparently do allow that or we wouldn't have been attacked in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Ah, so it's wrong for anyone else to defend a moral standard they feel is being violated?If RAD were being ***** about this situation, they would be receiving just as much heat. However, they're not. So guess what? I'm not giving them any grief. I cited your alliance as being full of people that regularly degrade decent debate to flame storms. I like debate, I'd love to see more civil debates, so please, do some of here a favor, and quit being an ***. (and no, I'm not saying or implying NSO are the only ****** here) I see no double standard in that, simple falsehoods presented by yourself. We haven't been the ones bogging this "debate" down into the realms of inanity. You, on the other hand, are doing a pretty good job of it. I don't care what your morals are or what you feel is being violated. I think your preconceptions of our alliance is clouding your judgment, or your morals standards are completely ludicrous, because I can't divine any way in which we've violated any common "moral standard." Most of which are, of course, a complete crock anyway, and generally enforced for the sake of homogeneity. I've already stated my opinion on that matter; if RAD allowed all of their members to act like asses, no, I would not be taking their side. Are you suggesting that RAD does not allow their members to act like asses? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Well they apparently do allow that or we wouldn't have been attacked in the first place. By "we," you mean Anthony, right? Unless I'm missing something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 By "we," you mean Anthony, right? Unless I'm missing something. He means the way Jason8 acted, which lead to this mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 I've already stated my opinion on that matter; if RAD allowed all of their members to act like asses, no, I would not be taking their side. Oh, we're allowed to act however we want as long as it falls under the charter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 By "we," you mean Anthony, right? Unless I'm missing something. That's what I meant. Anthony is Sith. Anthony was attacked. The Sith were attacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesalius Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Were not being "*****" about this either, so I dont see what standard youre basing your clearly well-researched findings upon. Decent debate? Kid, I think you just demonstrated for everyone to see just how completely oblivious to what you're talking about with this phrase right here. Civil Debate? [ooc]Not in my OWF![/ooc] So, then you should be able to answer the question which questions whether or not you are having those double standards? I can pretty much guarantee that we NSO members would still be acting the same regardless of what our AA is. Would you be just as critical? And making such blatantly wrong-faced assumptions and statements? Ha, you have a jaded sense of civility if you can honestly look back on your previous posts and say you aren't being an ***. You're right, decent was a poor word choice, civil is much better. I have answered this "question which questions", plainly, several times. I don't care what your AA is, you're degrading civil debate with personal attacks, slander, chiding, etc... As a result, I'm criticizing your actions. I've already stated the only reason I mentioned your AA is it's public face uses the same tactics, with little exception. If RAD were doing the same, I would be just as critical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 (edited) He means the way Jason8 acted, which lead to this mess. That's only part of it. The lack of a diplomatic approach on your (NSO) part is the other. But Diplomacy is so over rated. Who needs that? edit; left out a word. Edited August 16, 2009 by Emperor Marx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 I have answered this "question which questions", plainly, several times. I don't care what your AA is, you're degrading civil debate with personal attacks, slander, chiding, etc... As a result, I'm criticizing your actions. I've already stated the only reason I mentioned your AA is it's public face uses the same tactics, with little exception. If RAD were doing the same, I would be just as critical. Hypocrisy, I would like you to meet Vesalius. Vesalius, hypocrisy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts