The Confederation Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 *Private* The Prussian 4th Carrier Fleet, 2nd Pacific Fleet, 8th Pacific Fleets have all been fully mobilized in their respective domains. The previously deployed Prussian Peacekeepers in former C.S.S.R Ukraine are prepared to intercept Pax Pacis forces in Europe. Prussian Samoan Guard Unit 8 (50,000 regular army) and 30,000 Prussian Marines are prepared for immediate forward deployment into Pax Pacis. Luftwaffe Forces have secured and prepared nuclear and biological ICBMs in case of emergency deployment by the prospective enemy forces. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) CLASSIFIED "Oh, how glad we are to be on the other side of the world! Pax Americana, ftw!" Edited July 28, 2009 by JEDCJT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vedran Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 Somewhere in Oceana tower "Oh, how glad I am to be on the other side of the Indian Ocean. Non-interventionist foreign policy ftw!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevz Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) "International opinion has proven to us that the idea of Pax Pacis being an international peace keeping force is unacceptable therefore as of now we shall drop any such claim and withdraw our peace keeping forces from all theatres. Thus all forces in Slavorussia are being brought home and the two carriers operating near Pen Island are also withdrawing". OOC: Also you might want to get rid of item 8 in the OP as my forces hadn't killed anyone they had only just started to deploy. Edited July 28, 2009 by King Kevz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 *Private* Oh great, when we wanted to have some fun. *Public* "The recent actions taken by Pax Pacis has earned respect from us." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loannes Posted July 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 OOC: Looking ahead, didn''t expect you to back down. Too bad, this could've been fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 OOC: Looking ahead, didn''t expect you to back down. Too bad, this could've been fun OOC: ^Quoted for truth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 OOC: Looking ahead, didn''t expect you to back down. Too bad, this could've been fun OOC: Aw....no world war? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevz Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) OOC: Heh I didn't want to fight a single "war" it was just an attempt to stop conflict from occuring around the world. Now leave me alone. Edited July 28, 2009 by King Kevz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) "International opinion has proven to us that the idea of Pax Pacis being an international peace keeping force is unacceptable therefore as of now we shall drop any such claim and withdraw our peace keeping forces from all theatres. Thus all forces in Slavorussia are being brought home and the two carriers operating near Pen Island are also withdrawing".OOC: Also you might want to get rid of item 8 in the OP as my forces hadn't killed anyone they had only just started to deploy. While this certainly extends the life of your nation it doesn't get you off the hook yet, seeing the recent past of Pax Pacis Imperial authorities in cooperation with Drakoria have come up with the following agreement. 1. Pax Pacis will pay $50 million in repairs to Drakorian authorities2. Appointment of a Coalition chosen Council to overview all actions of Pax Pacis 3. Suspension of all Blue water naval ships, and a maximum of 10 Squadrons of non-Stealth Aircraft to protect own airspace. 4. Maximum of 100,000 Soldiers active at any time. 5. No offensive wars for the duration of these terms 6. Suspension of all Military agreements for the duration of these terms 7. Repairs have to been paid within 90(RL) days after signing this agreement. Edited July 28, 2009 by Centurius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevz Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 While this certainly extends the life of your nation it doesn't get you off the hook yet, seeing the recent past of Pax Pacis Imperial authorities in cooperation with Drakoria have come up with the following agreement. "That is the worst possible joke I have ever heard and let me explain why. First of all there has been no damages done so there is no need to pay for "repairs". There will be no Coalition as this government is running fine by itself, we will also be keeping our military as they are though for the future I will be keeping them in dock unless we are attacked. I have yet to declare a signle offensive war and I will never have to if I have my way also we currently have no military agreements with anyone." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loannes Posted July 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 That is quite unfortunate. Make sure you are certain of your choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitex Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 5. Intending to dispatch peacekeepers to Italy and infringe upon the nation's sovereigntyItaly is showing that its government is willing to use lethal force against protestors which is unacceptable and so if it continues we would be obliged to render assistance to the civilians suffering from the attacks. The Kitexian government would like to know why you think that the internal affairs of a nation, no matter how horrid, allow you to then use lethal force to aid "the civilians suffering from the attacks"? No nation should ever meddle in the internal affairs of another nation unless the IA of the nation brings international condemnation and other nations also use lethal force. The government of Kitex agrees that you are infringing upon Italy's sovereignty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 These terms are nothing but threatening and bullying - Pax Pacis has admitted their mistake and done what you demanded. Now these additional demands are beyond unreasonable. You talk about respecting the sovereignty of nations and then go ahead and attempt to slap unreasonable and unneeded demands on a nation that has already been picked on by the entire world. Drop them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevz Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 That is quite unfortunate. Make sure you are certain of your choice. "We have no reason to pay you anything as we caused no injuries or damages to your nation. We are also entitled to maintain our forces as they are of course if you do wish to attack us I can inform the Dragon Empire that they should prepare their forces as we are curently under their protection oh and we shall also contact Promised Land too". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loannes Posted July 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 "We have no reason to pay you anything as we caused no injuries or damages to your nation. We are also entitled to maintain our forces as they are of course if you do wish to attack us I can inform the Dragon Empire that they should prepare their forces as we are curently under their protection oh and we shall also contact Promised Land too". You've interfered upon the sovereignty of two nations, deployed armed forces within one, and were in a position to murder civilians of Drakoria. Does that not scream 'irresponsible governing?' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevz Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) The Kitexian government would like to know why you think that the internal affairs of a nation, no matter how horrid, allow you to then use lethal force to aid "the civilians suffering from the attacks"? No nation should ever meddle in the internal affairs of another nation unless the IA of the nation brings international condemnation and other nations also use lethal force. The government of Kitex agrees that you are infringing upon Italy's sovereignty. "Uh we were never going to use Lethal Force unless we had to. We weren't talking about invading and wiping out the government more we would ensure that protests would be able to carry on without violence erupting. Anyway we recognised our mistake and dropped the plan to be peace keepers". You've interfered upon the sovereignty of two nations, deployed armed forces within one, and were in a position to murder civilians of Drakoria. Does that not scream 'irresponsible governing?' "Our peace keepers were equipped with non-lethal and lethal methods. Lethal methods would only have been used if peace keepers came under indetified attack". Edited July 28, 2009 by King Kevz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 These terms are nothing but threatening and bullying - Pax Pacis has admitted their mistake and done what you demanded. Now these additional demands are beyond unreasonable. You talk about respecting the sovereignty of nations and then go ahead and attempt to slap unreasonable and unneeded demands on a nation that has already been picked on by the entire world. Drop them. New England seconds New Zealand's statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitex Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 "Uh we were never going to use Lethal Force unless we had to. We weren't talking about invading and wiping out the government more we would ensure that protests would be able to carry on without violence erupting. Anyway we recognised our mistake and dropped the plan to be peace keepers"."Our peace keepers were equipped with non-lethal and lethal methods. Lethal methods would only have been used if peace keepers came under indetified attack". "Uh we were never going to use Lethal Force unless we had to." So you admit that lethal force may have been used at some point? "Anyway we recognised our mistake and dropped the plan to be peace keepers." The government of Kitex is please by this, yet has decided that because of other things brought up in the OP, we shall not try to even begin diplomatic relations with Pax Paxis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serg92 Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 Serca thirds New Zealand's statements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevz Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 "Uh we were never going to use Lethal Force unless we had to."So you admit that lethal force may have been used at some point? "Anyway we recognised our mistake and dropped the plan to be peace keepers." The government of Kitex is please by this, yet has decided that because of other things brought up in the OP, we shall not try to even begin diplomatic relations with Pax Paxis. "Lethal force may have been used if lethal force was used against the Peace Keepers. Rubber bullets wouldn't help if some one was shooting back at you with an AK. It is disappointing you don't wish to set up diplomatic relations but maybe some time in the future we can". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 "Lethal force may have been used if lethal force was used against the Peace Keepers. Rubber bullets wouldn't help if some one was shooting back at you with an AK. It is disappointing you don't wish to set up diplomatic relations but maybe some time in the future we can". The fact you have been deploying Soldiers in the sovereign territory of other nations is an act of war, lethal means or not. The fact you thought you were international police also shows inability of governing at the highest levels. Should you refuse the terms or come with a similar counter agreement we will still consider your actions a declaration of war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevz Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 The fact you have been deploying Soldiers in the sovereign territory of other nations is an act of war, lethal means or not. The fact you thought you were international police also shows inability of governing at the highest levels. Should you refuse the terms or come with a similar counter agreement we will still consider your actions a declaration of war. "We have not yet or ever will make any decleration of war against anyone at this current time. We sent forces to an area we were requested to and then when it was proven this was an error we withdrew without causing any harm or damage. We have also dropped the idea of being a peace keeping force and will instead just stay in Asia. You told us to stay out of European affairs and so we shall. If you do attack us then we will see it as an attack on us and will have to activate our protectors for defenses". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 The fact you have been deploying Soldiers in the sovereign territory of other nations is an act of war, lethal means or not. The fact you thought you were international police also shows inability of governing at the highest levels. Should you refuse the terms or come with a similar counter agreement we will still consider your actions a declaration of war. They were requested by Slavorussia and Slavorussia believed it was Slavorussian territory. Pax Pacis was caught in the middle of a three-way push for land and by siding with one immediately earned the hostilities of the other two. That they were in the "sovereign territory" was your belief, not theirs. They were fighting for higher standards of care of citizens: preventing deaths, helping stability, assisting an ally. That you have suddenly become hostile to Pax Pacis for their use of their military as they seem fit is strange. Either way, all of New Zealands waters are closed to any ship, be it military or economic, from all of the nations supporting these terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 "We have not yet or ever will make any decleration of war against anyone at this current time. We sent forces to an area we were requested to and then when it was proven this was an error we withdrew without causing any harm or damage. We have also dropped the idea of being a peace keeping force and will instead just stay in Asia. You told us to stay out of European affairs and so we shall. If you do attack us then we will see it as an attack on us and will have to activate our protectors for defenses". While you are technically at war with Drakoria and as such the coalition defending it we will let you off with a warning this time however one more mistake and our patience will have met its end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.