comrade nikonov Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) SHENYANG- With the fall of the USNA into anarchy, the Northeast People's Republic has declared the area a protectorate of the Communist International. Working in cooperation with Canadian forces from across the border, paratroopers bearing Comintern ensigns have landed in major former USNA cities, cooperating with local councils to establish a temporary and stable transitional state. (OOC: Nation deleted, Gebiv told me to RP it >_>) Edited May 28, 2009 by comrade nikonov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 The Jersey Republic supports this move and offers to assist with the protection. A former incarnation of the Republic was great friends with them, thus we wish to help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balomesh Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: Ummm why where you deleted? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Indeed, Canadian forces cooperated with other ComIntern troops, many of them from Manchukuo, to turn Alaska into a protectorate of the Communist International. Two Canadian divisions would be sent as permanent police-forces until the people could organise themselves into one or more true nations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: Ummm why where you deleted? OOC: Who me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: Ummm why where you deleted? OOC: USNA was not me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gebiv Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) Gebiv does not recognize the Northeast People's Republic's right to have a protectorate in North America. (OOC: Not in your sphere of influence.) We believe a longtime stable American power, such as Viniland or Tahoe, would be best suited to protect those lands. However, we will stick to our non-intervention in American affairs. While we do not believe this is the best course of action by the Northeastern Republic, we shall not move to counteract it. OOC: Edit is for clarity. Edited May 28, 2009 by Gebiv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Californian Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) We believe Viniland or the Tahoe Republic is best suited to become a protector of former USNA territory. We too echo Gebiv's sentiments and wonder why the Northeast People's Republic is involving itself in Antarctican and North American affairs. Edited May 28, 2009 by Californian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Gebiv does not recognize the Northeast People's Republic's right to have a protectorate in North America. (OOC: Not in your sphere of influence.) We believe a longtime stable American power, such as Viniland, would be best suited to protect those lands.However, we will stick to our non-intervention in American affairs. While we do not believe this is the best course of action, we shall not move to counteract it. We believe Viniland or the Tahoe Republic is best suited to become a protector of former USNA territory. We too echo Gebiv's sentiments and wonder why the Northeast People's Republic is involving itself in Antarctican and North American affairs. Do note that both Canadian and NRP soldiers moved in. It's a ComIntern protectorate, not an NRP protectorate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We simply acted upon the interests of Comintern. The makeup of forces in USNA currently is overwhelmingly Canadian, and we simply decided to act first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) The Republic supports ComIntern making it a protectorate. That means, soldiers from each nation of that bloc. From what we understand it appears that your troops alone are taking over the territory under the banner of the ComIntern. If that is the case then we do not support your "invasion" into North America. And with Canada's clarification we do support it Edited May 28, 2009 by James Wilson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gebiv Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Do note that both Canadian and NRP soldiers moved in. It's a ComIntern protectorate, not an NRP protectorate. Then what is ComIntern's stake in this? I do not recall USNA being a member state. You ability to choose a country as being unfit to rule itself, and thus in anarchy, is, quite frankly, alarming. Again, like we hope ComIntern does, we have no major stake in North America and will leave the North Americans to sort this one out. However, we caution ComIntern about this move. Perhaps a protectorate controlled by the older nations of North America, not just Canada? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 For Jersey's clarification, due to the terrible memories of WWII Japanese invasions, we never use the word invade. We either intervene or resolve to military actions that have already been completed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manetheren Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Au contraire. Viniland and Tahoe are the regional powers on the West Coast of the United States and as such will assume a protectorate over the region. We are not comfortable with an internationalist communist alliance taking over land close to our borders and will not permit it. Canada is primarily based on the eastern coast of North America despite having land near Alaska. We will NOT permit forces from Comintern to make landfall in Alaska, except for perhaps Canada with whom we are much more comfortable than the rest (except for New England, who has no reason to interfere in Alaska). Troops from Tahoe are currently landing in southern Alaska and have moved into Anchorage. We will not attempt to move Comintern troops by force, although will respond in kind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 For Jersey's clarification, due to the terrible memories of WWII Japanese invasions, we never use the word invade. We either intervene or resolve to military actions that have already been completed. What is this WWII you speak of? We support Tahoe's inititative. OOC: RL history has no place here, Niko. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Then what is ComIntern's stake in this? I do not recall USNA being a member state. You ability to choose a country as being unfit to rule itself, and thus in anarchy, is, quite frankly, alarming.Again, like we hope ComIntern does, we have no major stake in North America and will leave the North Americans to sort this one out. However, we caution ComIntern about this move. Perhaps a protectorate controlled by the older nations of North America, not just Canada? Should other NorthAmerican nations want to help, Canada will certainly allow them to do so. However, at the time there are only two or three nations older in NA than Canada. Viniland, Tahoe, and perhaps one other nation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manetheren Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 For the record and to clarify our previous statement, we would support a joint protectorate between Tahoe, Viniland and Canada. The rest of the Comintern needs to leave and let Americans deal with American affairs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: my history is that the NPR is remnant of Manchukuo, which the soviets did not dismantle but rather turned it communist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: my history is that the NPR is remnant of Manchukuo, which the soviets did not dismantle but rather turned it communist OOC: Stop rewriting RP history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 For the record and to clarify our previous statement, we would support a joint protectorate between Tahoe, Viniland and Canada. The rest of the Comintern needs to leave and let Americans deal with American affairs. Acknowledged. We thus ask the other ComIntern nations to withdraw, so that the territory can be a CanTaVi (or TaViCan or whatever variation you wish) protectorate. Hm...CanTaVi. Sounds nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 As accordingly, the NPR soldiers will return to their homelands. A shorter deployment is always a better one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We would feel much more comfortable if only North American nations' troops were stationed at the nation. Also, as we speak, two divisions have left their headquarters in Juneau and should be inside the protectorate in less than half of an hour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manetheren Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We thank Canada for their wise and quick deliberation which will surely help keep America peaceful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted May 31, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 ANNOUNCING THE BEGINNING OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF BEIJING Deeming the radiation levels emitted by the rather short-lived but high-output isotopes from the fallout to have been lowered to a level that can be safely tolerated by the human body with moderate protection, the Northeast People's Republic has announced plans to rebuild Beijing. First, the ruins of the city will be completely razed, as their radioactive dangers are worrying. Then, a layer of loess will be spread over the city, to about a depth of 30cm. Then, a layer of impermeable clay will be laid over this to a depth of 5cm. After that, another 25cm of loess will be laid, effectively burying the radiation underneath the 10cm of topsoil to be laid upon the loess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted June 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2009 Air Combat Doctrine Revolutionized The Air Force has been changed forever. Never again shall incoordination cause unneeded casualties in the ranks of the People's Republic's elite military branch. From now on, the Air Force will adopt the integrated combat wing approach to organization and structure, as outlined below: Capital Defense Air Wing -104th - 124th Fighter Defense Squadrons (F/A-22) -125th - 129th Fighter Elite Squadrons (F/A-22)* -130th AWAC Support Squadron (3xKJ-2000 + 10 F/A-22) -131st Electronic Countermeasure Squadron (F-35) -132nd - 134th Ground Support Squadrons (F-35) Manchuria Frontier Air Wing -201st - 220th Fighter Squadrons (F/A-22) -221st, 222nd AWAC Support Squadron (3xKJ-2000 + 10 F/A-22 ea) -223rd - 228th Ground Support Squadrons (8 F-35 & 8 Tu-160 ea) -229th - 230th Elite Air Squadrons (F/A-22)* *Se t to upgrade to J-15 standard New Fighter in Development, Almost Ready to Be Deployed Shenyang Aviation Research Institute 636 has announced that its secret development of the J-15 stealth fighter has passed initial testing phases, and is set to equip the Northeast People's Republic's Elite Fighter Squadrons in less than 2 years. The new fighter has similar specifications to the F/A-22, but is indigenously produced and has even higher thrust. A diagram is provided below: OOC: It just looks cooler, about the same performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.