Burning Glory Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 They signed a treaty with you because they wanted the backup in case the war went south. Not to help you guys out. Did you even consider that they signed right before a massive war, and then immediately asked for your help? And for the record, we did everything we could to help you out. Naon will freely tell you that. Way wrong, and way off topic = Epic fail!! BR please add PS to that as well, thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BastardofGod Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Well that sucks to try to keep the game even this round. GDA & RE & MHA didn't try to ally the world...but as it seems the world decided to ally. Very ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKongIl Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 (edited) This is absolutely ridiculous.I am all for any bloc wars for sure. I mean, there is nothing like fighting with your allies but there is a point in time where the numbers need to stop. Does it really take a thousand nations to take down 600? No. It just shows that none of you even have any skill. You need the numbers to win and not the military planning. At this point you all could anarchy us in a second..but there's no honor in it all. So you got to say you took down MHA, right? Whoopdy !@#$@#$ doo...look what you had to do to even get there. I mean, that's a little sad. We're proud that we've even lasted this long and you WILL get retaliation. This war isn't over and we plan on making a statement. We plan on showing our skill, thank you for the opportunity. If it weren't for alliances like you...TE wouldn't be able to differentiate between honorable and dishonorable. I remember being on the other end of a Judgment dogpile last round. You and Thiasport haven't forgotten that one already have you? You were on the right side of the dogpile that time. You guys have to realize that the only unforgivable sin in TE is for an alliance to start the round in first place. Its just the way it is, nothing personal. Happened to me in IDIOT and again last round in MI. I don't think it has anything to do with honor. If you are not having fun in TE regardless of your NS then you are doing something wrong. MHA isn't as hated as IDIOT or MI was so if you play the politics right I'd guess you guys (and gals) will be alright. Edited March 15, 2009 by JimKongIl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKongIl Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 warlordz were faithful to MI the entire time they existed. remember they were only around less than a week of round 3 :-/ I don't know about that one. I wouldnt say that Warlordz betrayed MI but I don't think you can say they were faithful up til the end. From the start of last round it was clear to us in MI Warlordz no longer had our back. You could probably make a case for MHA betraying MI last round. But again this is TE and that round is over and it is water under the bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan King Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 I have to give mad props to Konvictman, he's cleaning my clock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreedomvilleAT Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 I remember being on the other end of a Judgment dogpile last round. You and Thiasport haven't forgotten that one already have you? You were on the right side of the dogpile that time. You guys have to realize that the only unforgivable sin in TE is for an alliance to start the round in first place. Its just the way it is, nothing personal. Happened to me in IDIOT and again last round in MI. I don't think it has anything to do with honor. If you are not having fun in TE regardless of your NS then you are doing something wrong. MHA isn't as hated as IDIOT or MI was so if you play the politics right I'd guess you guys (and gals) will be alright. This is really funny. You can't compare those blocs to this one. It's just as simple as that. Those blocs were NOT as nearly as strong as the initiative. Those "dogpiles" weren't exactly "fair" but they weren't as extreme as this one. 1211 nations..really guys? Really? Some of your small alliances are following the top alliances like brain dead sheep and the rest just want war no matter who it's directed at. It has nothing to do with who likes MHA and has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that we're at the top. I don't understand why all of you have to pretend that MHA did something wrong when we all know very well that this is just another king of the hill war. Oh and it's not our fault that we have this many followers this round. What YOU guys have to realize is you can anarchy every single nation in MHA but none of us will leave and that's what will keep us on top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser Indie Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 the rest just want war no matter who it's directed at. Congratulations, You may have finally grasped the concept of TE... Also, get your facts right before you start posting, at the end of last round TUF was outnumbered at least 3:1 and yeah there may be more nations this time, but that's good because it just means more people are getting in to TE. Now kindly quit your moaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreedomvilleAT Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Congratulations, You may have finally grasped the concept of TE...Also, get your facts right before you start posting, at the end of last round TUF was outnumbered at least 3:1 and yeah there may be more nations this time, but that's good because it just means more people are getting in to TE. Now kindly quit your moaning. I know what the concept of TE is, but I was saying that the reasoning for war wasn't because no one likes MHA [initiative members like to act like MHA doesn't have any friends. boohoo], its because people just want war and follow the side with the greater number. I cn tel joo read oftn. Quit moaning? No. How can you stop doing something you never did in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Congratulations, You may have finally grasped the concept of TE...Also, get your facts right before you start posting, at the end of last round TUF was outnumbered at least 3:1 and yeah there may be more nations this time, but that's good because it just means more people are getting in to TE. Now kindly quit your moaning. Silence the non-believers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKongIl Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 This is really funny.You can't compare those blocs to this one. It's just as simple as that. Those blocs were NOT as nearly as strong as the initiative. Those "dogpiles" weren't exactly "fair" but they weren't as extreme as this one. 1211 nations..really guys? Really? Some of your small alliances are following the top alliances like brain dead sheep and the rest just want war no matter who it's directed at. It has nothing to do with who likes MHA and has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that we're at the top. I don't understand why all of you have to pretend that MHA did something wrong when we all know very well that this is just another king of the hill war. Oh and it's not our fault that we have this many followers this round. What YOU guys have to realize is you can anarchy every single nation in MHA but none of us will leave and that's what will keep us on top. I never said MHA did anything wrong this round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 final stats time!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Glory Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 (edited) Well that sucks to try to keep the game even this round. GDA & RE & MHA didn't try to ally the world...but as it seems the world decided to ally. Very ironic. LMAO! How's it feel to be on the other side of a curb stomp...Relly just like you guys said last round, its all fun. So just have fun..... BG. Edited March 16, 2009 by Burning Glory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 LMAO! How's it feel to be on the other side of a curb stomp...Relly just like you guys said last round, its all fun. So just have fun.....BG. that was no curbstomp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WileyXero Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 (edited) The amount of fussing in the topic is getting ridiculous. If your not on the MHA side or the Initiative side then there isnt a reason you should be posting in here anyway. If you are the least you can do is post something relevant. The reason for this war was not for the Initiative to "Gang up" on any alliances. The Fellowship took part in this due to friends and allies. The cold hard fact is that people are going to do some crazy things. Wars can spring up and end at any given second. If you dont like it, then dont play. This war is already close to over so those who wanna jump in on the action should just forget it. Its a waste of your time and there isnt any reason you should be there if not being there from day 1. This is really funny.You can't compare those blocs to this one. It's just as simple as that. Those blocs were NOT as nearly as strong as the initiative. Those "dogpiles" weren't exactly "fair" but they weren't as extreme as this one. 1211 nations..really guys? Really? Some of your small alliances are following the top alliances like brain dead sheep and the rest just want war no matter who it's directed at. It has nothing to do with who likes MHA and has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that we're at the top. I don't understand why all of you have to pretend that MHA did something wrong when we all know very well that this is just another king of the hill war. Oh and it's not our fault that we have this many followers this round. What YOU guys have to realize is you can anarchy every single nation in MHA but none of us will leave and that's what will keep us on top. Cant be on top if we destroy everyone of you. Edited March 16, 2009 by NEWiley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 (edited) Cant be on top if we destroy everyone of you. EDIT: I've decided to not add more to this drama Edited March 16, 2009 by Sethly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Californian Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 (edited) Day 5 - Ending War Stats NOTE: Values take into account alliances that joined later on. MHA and Allies Mostly Harmful Alliance Nations: 266 (+1) Total Nation Strength: 378,780 (-51,122) Average Nation Strength: 1,424 (-175) Alliance Score: 26.26 (-0.59) Nations in Anarchy: 123 (+2) (46.24%) Nuclear Warheads: 5 (+1) Roman Empire Nations: 137 (+0) Total Nation Strength: 103,147 (-62,708) Average Nation Strength: 753 (-458) Alliance Score: 13.22 (-0.43) Nations in Anarchy: 119 (+19) (86.86%) Nuclear Warheads: 0 (+0) Global Democratic Alliance Nations: 106 (+0) Total Nation Strength: 111,005 (-37,871) Average Nation Strength: 1,047 (-357) Alliance Score: 10.33 (-0.30) Nations in Anarchy: 76 (+10) (71.70%) Nuclear Warheads: 0 (+0) SWAT Nations: 73 (-2) Total Nation Strength: 70,092 (-19,912) Average Nation Strength: 960 (-240) Alliance Score: 7.09 (-0.38) Nations in Anarchy: 50 (-8) (68.49%) Nuclear Warheads: 0 (-1) Poison Clan (New Addition) Nations: 44 Total Nation Strength: 51,739 Average Nation Strength: 1,176 Alliance Score: 4.31 Nations in Anarchy: 12 (27.27%) Nuclear Warheads: 0 Total for ENTIRE WAR: Total Nations: 602 --> 626 Total Nation Strength: 996,643 --> 714,763 Average Nation Strength: 1,655 --> 1,072 Alliance Score: 60.73 --> 61.21 Nations in Anarchy: 51 (8.47%) --> 380 (60.70%) Nuclear Warheads: 30 --> 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- The TE Initiative and allies Fark Nations: 242 (+3) Total Nation Strength: 353,649 (-14,831) Average Nation Strength: 1,461 (-81) Alliance Score: 23.91 (-0.16) Nations in Anarchy: 52 (+30) (21.49%) Nuclear Warheads: 3 (-4) The Phoenix Federation Nations: 114 (+2) Total Nation Strength: 208,927 (+13,086) Average Nation Strength: 1,833 (+84) Alliance Score: 11.41 (+0.05) Nations in Anarchy: 17 (+1) (14.91%) Nuclear Warheads: 16 (+3) Lafayette Escadrille Nations: 105 (+4) Total Nation Strength: 256,871 (+15,732) Average Nation Strength: 2,446 (+58) Alliance Score: 10.72 (+0.26) Nations in Anarchy: 7 (+1) (6.67%) Nuclear Warheads: 16 (+2) The Fellowship Nations: 97 (+7) Total Nation Strength: 156,973 (+11,653) Average Nation Strength: 1,618 (+3) Alliance Score: 9.64 (+0.55) Nations in Anarchy: 13 (+1) (13.40%) Nuclear Warheads: 15 (-2) Crimson Empire Nations: 52 (+1) Total Nation Strength: 86,286 (+3531) Average Nation Strength: 1,659 (+36) Alliance Score: 5.17 (+0.02) Nations in Anarchy: 6 (-2) (11.54%) Nuclear Warheads: 10 (+2) The 4077th Nations: 51 (+0) Total Nation Strength: 110,690 (+1,208) Average Nation Strength: 2,170 (+23) Alliance Score: 5.16 (-0.08) Nations in Anarchy: 6 (-2) (11.76%) Nuclear Warheads: 16 (-3) Common Defense Treaty Nations: 56 (-2) Total Nation Strength: 109,381 (-13,021) Average Nation Strength: 1,953 (-157) Alliance Score: 5.63 (-0.32) Nations in Anarchy: 18 (+14)(34.62%) Nuclear Warheads: 9 (-4) Bantuan Operasional Sekolah Nations: 39 (+3) Total Nation Strength: 62,062 (+6,515) Average Nation Strength: 1,591 (+48) Alliance Score: 3.87 (+0.24) Nations in Anarchy: 2 (+0) (5.13%) Nuclear Warheads: 1 (+0) Blackwater Nations: 33 (+0) Total Nation Strength: 64,822 (+1,118) Average Nation Strength: 1,964 (+34) Alliance Score: 3.32 (-0.05) Nations in Anarchy: 0 (+0) (0.00%) Nuclear Warheads: 3 (+0) We Are Perth Army Nations: 33 (+0) Total Nation Strength: 66,945 (+997) Average Nation Strength: 2,029 (+31) Alliance Score: 3.32 (-0.05) Nations in Anarchy: 6 (+2) (18.18%) Nuclear Warheads: 5 (+0) Aztec Nations: 73 (+0) Total Nation Strength: 121,883 (-79) Average Nation Strength: 1,670 (-1) Alliance Score: 7.26 (-0.12) Nations in Anarchy: 16 (+0) (21.92%) Nuclear Warheads: 9 (+1) Rough Riders Nations: 12 (+0) Total Nation Strength: 22,740 (+660) Average Nation Strength: 1,895 (+138) Alliance Score: 1.20 (-0.02) Anarchy: 2 (-1) (16.67%) Nukes: 2 (+1) The Red Guard Nations: 154 (+10) Total Nation Strength: 215,810 (13,882) Average Nation Strength: 1,401 (-1) Alliance Score: 15.19 (+0.76) Anarchy: 27 (+8) (17.53%) Nuclear Warheads: 5 (+0) United Nations Nations: 95 (+0) Total Nation Strength: 99,894 (-2,896) Average Nation Strength: 1,052 (-31) Alliance Score: 9.26 (-0.16) Anarchy: 30 (+1) (31.58) Nuclear Warheads: 0 (+0) TenLOSS (New Addition) Nations: 50 Total Nation Strength: 90,115 Average Nation Strength: 1,802 Alliance Score: 5.00 Anarchy: 1 (2.00%) Nuclear Warheads: 5 New Viridian Order (New Addition) Nations: 26 Total Nation Strength: 45,289 Average Nation Strength: 1,742 Alliance Score: 2.59 Anarchy: 5 (19.23%) Nuclear Warheads: 5 Hammertime (New Addition) Nations: 36 Total Nation Strength: 63,373 Average Nation Strength: 1,760 Alliance Score: 3.59 Anarchy: 5 (13.89%) Nuclear Warheads: 6 real FAN (New Addition) Nations: 21 Total Nation Strength: 38,848 Average Nation Strength: 1,850 Alliance Score: 2.10 Anarchy: 2 (9.52%) Nuclear Warheads: 0 Total for ENTIRE WAR: Total Nations: 861 --> 1,289 Total Nation Strength: 1,485,976 --> 2,174,558 Average Nation Strength: 1,725 --> 1,772 Alliance Score: 88.16 --> 128.34 Nations in Anarchy: 66 (7.66%) --> 215 (16.68%) Nuclear Warheads: 100 --> 126 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Side-by-side Comparison for END OF WAR INITIATIVE - MHA AND ALLIES Nations: 1,289 - 626 Total Nation Strength: 2,174,558 - 714,763 Average Nation Strength: 1,772 - 1,072 Alliance Score: 128.34 - 61.21 Percent In Anarchy: 16.68% - 60.70% Nuclear Warheads: 126 - 5 Edited March 16, 2009 by Californian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbert Torres Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Good job everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromp Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Oh, is the war over already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian55 Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Good job everyone on the war, its nice to know its over now, and good luck to all the alliances. much love. -DAMIAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 That was fun, good job everyone. Albeit I'm sad I don't have anything to argue about now... o7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dran129 Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 I must say, I'm impressed with MHA only losing 175 Average NS. Seemed like you guys took the biggest hitters and to loose the low of an amount isn't bad at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorPwnag Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Speaking for the thousands of super strong nations in my head: I declare a thumb war with anyone in the inititave. You SHALL be defeated!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts