Lynneth Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Due to the recent... events with TPF, does the sudden militarization of my nation need to be reflected in RP? Should I make a thread? I've gotten tons of satellites and MD's that I didn't have before.Then again, I don't wanna cause any IC apprehension in the already volatile Africa we have. Imo? You CAN RP everything you have ingame. You do not HAVE to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael McBride Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 I would like to submit a proposition. We all know landing ships, in amphibious landings are used in much greater numbers than what they are IG.I would like to propose that instead, IG landing ships be termed as IC troop transports. I say no. Landing ships and troops transports are two completely different things. Landing ships carry troops, yes, but they also carry tanks, helos, and landing craft. These landing craft are what bring the equipment to shore, very rarely is it the landing ship itself. So, for this reason, I say no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 LSTs are better likened to helicopter carriers / Amphibious Transport Docks and are platforms for amphibious assaults. They may host LCVPs and other amphibious landing crafts and hence are better restricted to IG numbers itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 I say no. Landing ships and troops transports are two completely different things. Landing ships carry troops, yes, but they also carry tanks, helos, and landing craft. These landing craft are what bring the equipment to shore, very rarely is it the landing ship itself. So, for this reason, I say no. So why do they even call it a landing ship? I don't get it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razgriz 2K9 Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Landing ships refer to Helicopter Carriers and Amphibious Platforms, what you are reffering to are Transport Ships, which are an entirely different subject. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) Oh....OH, I get it now. OK. Thanks. Edited December 29, 2009 by Subtleknifewielder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razgriz 2K9 Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Your welcome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biohazard Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Your welcome I see you take all the credit, when I spent all the time covertly PMing you the answer, and what to say... figures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razgriz 2K9 Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Yeah, right.... Anyway, new year means a new beginning, wipe a clean slate for Yuktobania and start from there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Yeah, right.... Anyway, new year means a new beginning, wipe a clean slate for Yuktobania and start from there. You're not re-rolling, are you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razgriz 2K9 Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) Technically no, I'm still going to keep the land and it will still be Yuktobania, but it will be temporarily under anarchy or under some protectorate or something for the time being. And even then, I will be running the country. Edited December 29, 2009 by Razgriz 2K9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Good. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tahsir Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 For you CAN guys http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=77158 Remember that no one can command other's troops. You have to command your own. Just thought I'd put up a reminder for some of the newer members in CAN talking about a head commander that might be thought of "he does the war work". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Tahsir is correct. Although he can give orders, you have to carry them out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razgriz 2K9 Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 wait, what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 (edited) wait, what? I mean, an allied commander can give orders, but it's up to the individual RP'ers to carry out those orders. Edited December 30, 2009 by Subtleknifewielder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tahsir Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 wait, what? One person cant be "I move my tanks, and then my allies tanks, and then my other allies tanks." It has to be each person RPing their own military's actions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 I'd like to take this time to nominate Sargun for !@#$%^& of the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHAYD Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 I'd like to take this time to nominate Sargun for !@#$%^& of the year. I believe nominating yourself is considered capital offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 @Elrich: I see how much this means to you. Instead of political wrangling or continuing out or trying to get concessions out of you, I'm just going to stop the thread entirely and act as if it never happened. This is for you, I won't do it for anyone else (and I sure damn well didn't do it for lavo) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Still. If anyone lives for CNRP and threatens to...its not good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Second part of my "be nice to the people I $%&@ed over" story: Leaving Taipei with DET/Lavo/whoever wants it so that they don't have to worry I'll do something stupid. As far as I'm concerned, Raiyku Shinje never made a comeback and I have no IC reason to go back to him again. On that note, I hope you all accept the retcon because I damn sure already have moved on. Have a good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 I wasn't heavily affected by it, so I reserve judgement on the ret-con. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manetheren Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 My opinion is retcons should never be used Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 I didn't ask your opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.